OM Forum—In-Person or Virtual? What Will Operations Management/Research Conferences Look Like?

References

• Akhoondnejad A (2016) Tourist loyalty to a local cultural event: The case of Turkmen handicrafts festival. Tourism Management 52:468–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akkaş A, Gaur V (2022) OM Forum—Reducing food waste: An operations management research agenda. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(3):1261–1275.Link, Google Scholar
• Arend ME, Bruijns SR (2019) Disparity in conference registration cost for delegates from low- and middle-income backgrounds. African J. Emergency Medicine 9(3):156–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aşan K, Kaptangil K, Gargacı Kınay A (2020) Mediating role of perceived festival value in the relationship between experiences and satisfaction. Internat. J. Event Festival Management 11(2):255–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astudillo MF, AzariJafari H (2018) Estimating the global warming emissions of the LCAXVII conference: Connecting flights matter. Internat. J. Life Cycle Assessment 23(7):1512–1516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cavallin Toscani A, Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN, Vinelli A (2023a) Life cycle assessment of in-person, virtual, and hybrid academic conferences: New evidence and perspectives. J. Indust. Ecology 1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cavallin Toscani A, Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN, Vinelli A (2023b) OM-OR conference value survey data set. Zenodo. Accessed August 17, 2023, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8256529.Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A (2014) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Donlon E (2021) Lost and found: The academic conference in pandemic and post-pandemic times. Irish Ed. Stud. 40(2):367–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etzion D, Gehman J, Davis GF (2022) Reimagining academic conferences: Toward a federated model of conferencing. Management Learn. 53(2):350–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eurostat (2021) Carbon dioxide equivalent: Statistics Explained. Glossary. Accessed October 14, 2022, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Category:Environment_glossary.Google Scholar
• Fraser H, Soanes K, Jones SA, Jones CS, Malishev M (2017) The value of virtual conferencing for ecology and conservation. Conservation Biol. 31(3):540–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulcher MR, Bolton ML, Millican MD, Michalska-Smith MJ, Dundore-Arias JP, Handelsman J, Klassen JL, et al. (2020) Broadening participation in scientific conferences during the era of social distancing. Trends Microbiology 28(12):949–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauss K (2021) What are the social and scientific benefits of participating at academic conferences? Insights from a survey among doctoral students and postdocs in Germany. Res. Evaluation 30(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hischier R, Hilty L (2002) Environmental impacts of an international conference. Environ. Impact Assessment Rev. 22(5):543–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jäckle S (2019) We have to change! The carbon footprint of ECPR general conferences and ways to reduce it. Eur. Political Sci. 18(4):630–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klöwer M, Hopkins D, Allen M, Higham J (2020) An analysis of ways to decarbonize conference travel after COVID-19. Nature 583(7816):356–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuper R (2019) Travel-related carbon dioxide emissions from American Society of Landscape Architects annual meetings. Landscape J. 38(1–2):105–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langin K (2021) “Hybrid” scientific conferences aim to offer the best of in-person and virtual meetings. Science (1979).Google Scholar
• Lester B (2007) Greening the meeting. Sci. 318(5847):36–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mair J (2014) Events as proenvironmental learning spaces. Event Management 18(4):421–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monroe KB (1990) Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions (McGraw-Hill Pub. Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Monteiro DMS, Brockbank C, Heron G (2020) Food waste in event catering: A case study in higher education. J. Food Production Marketing 26(4):262–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neugebauer S, Bolz M, Mankaa R, Traverso M (2020) How sustainable are sustainability conferences?—Comprehensive life cycle assessment of an international conference series in Europe. J. Cleaner Production 242:118516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Our World in Data (2020) CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions. Accessed June 20, 2022, https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions.Google Scholar
• Reay DS (2003) Virtual solution to carbon cost of conferences. Nature 424(6946):251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowe N (2018) “When you get what you want, but not what you need”: The motivations, affordances and shortcomings of attending academic/scientific conferences. Internat. J. Res. Ed. Sci. 4(2):714–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sá MJ, Ferreira CM, Serpa S (2019) Virtual and face-to-face academic conferences: Comparison and potentials. J. Ed. Soc. Res. 9(2):35–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarabipour S, Khan A, Seah YFS, Mwakilili AD, Mumoki FN, Sáez PJ, Schwessinger B, Debat HJ, Mestrovic T (2021) Changing scientific meetings for the better. Nat. Human Behav. 5(3):296–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skiles M, Yang E, Reshef O, Muñoz DR, Cintron D, Lind ML, Rush A, et al. (2021) Conference demographics and footprint changed by virtual platforms. Nature Sustainability 5:149–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tao Y, Steckel D, Klemeš JJ, You F (2021) Trend toward virtual and hybrid conferences may be an effective climate change mitigation strategy. Nature Comm. 12(1):7324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tashakkori A, Creswell JW (2007) The new era of mixed methods. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1(1):3–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• UK GOV (2022) Greenhouse gas reporting: Conversion factors 2021. Accessed June 20, 2022, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2021.Google Scholar
• van Ewijk S, Hoekman P (2021) Emission reduction potentials for academic conference travel. J. Indust. Ecology 25(3):778–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Marketing 52(3):2–22.Crossref, Google Scholar