The Choice Overload Effect in Online Recommender Systems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0659

References

  • Arnold MJ, Reynolds KE (2003) Hedonic shopping motivations. J. Retailing 79(2):77–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Wager S (2019) Estimating treatment effects with causal forests: An application. Observational Stud. 5(2):37–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Tibshirani J, Wager S (2019) Generalized random forests. Ann. Statist. 47(2):1148–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babin BJ, Darden WR, Griffin M (1994) Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J. Consumer. Res. 20(4):644–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bleier A, Eisenbeiss M (2015) Personalized online advertising effectiveness: The interplay of what, when, and where. Marketing Sci. 34(5):669–688.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bobadilla J, Ortega F, Hernando A, Gutiérrez A (2013) Recommender systems survey. Knowledge-Based Systems 46:109–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen D, Knijnenburg BP, Willemsen MC, Graus M (2010) Understanding choice overload in recommender systems. Proc. Fourth ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 63–70.Google Scholar
  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learn. 45(1):5–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buell RW, Kalkanci B (2021) How transparency into internal and external responsibility initiatives influences consumer choice. Management Sci. 67(2):932–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon GP, Gallino S, Olivares M (2019) Does adding inventory increase sales? Evidence of a scarcity effect in US automobile dealerships. Management Sci. 65(4):1469–1485.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Calvo E, Cui R, Wagner L (2023) Disclosing product availability in online retail. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(2):427–447.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Yao S (2017) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 63(12):4345–4365.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chernev A, Böckenholt U, Goodman J (2015) Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. J. Consumer Psych. 25(2):333–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cui Y, Davis AM (2022) Tax-induced inequalities in the sharing economy. Management Sci. 68(10):7202–7220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cui R, Zhang DJ, Bassamboo A (2019) Learning from inventory availability information: Evidence from field experiments on Amazon. Management Sci. 65(3):1216–1235.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • De los Santos B, Koulayev S (2017) Optimizing click-through in online rankings with endogenous search refinement. Marketing Sci. 36(4):542–564.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • De los Santos B, Hortaçsu A, Wildenbeest MR (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2955–2980.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dean M, Ravindran D, Stoye J (2022) A better test of choice overload. Preprint, submitted December 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03931.Google Scholar
  • Diehl K, Poynor C (2010) Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations, and satisfaction. J. Marketing Res. 47(2):312–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman J, Zhang DJ, Liu X, Zhang N (2022) Customer choice models vs. machine learning: Finding optimal product displays on Alibaba. Oper. Res. 70(1):309–328.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ferreira KJ, Lee BHA, Simchi-Levi D (2016) Analytics for an online retailer: Demand forecasting and price optimization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(1):69–88.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M, Gallino S, Li J (2018) Competition-based dynamic pricing in online retailing: A methodology validated with field experiments. Management Sci. 64(6):2496–2514.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallego G, Li A, Truong VA, Wang X (2020) Approximation algorithms for product framing and pricing. Oper. Res. 68(1):134–160.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallino S, Moreno A (2018) The value of fit information in online retail: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):767–787.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallino S, Karacaoglu N, Moreno A (2023) Need for speed: The impact of in-process delays on customer behavior in online retail. Oper. Res. 71(3):876–894.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2012) Designing ranking systems for hotels on travel search engines by mining user-generated and crowdsourced content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):493–520.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gourville JT, Soman D (2005) Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Sci. 24(3):382–395.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greifeneder R, Scheibehenne B, Kleber N (2010) Less may be more when choosing is difficult: Choice complexity and too much choice. Acta Psychologica 133(1):45–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo T, Sriram S, Manchanda P (2021) The effect of information disclosure on industry payments to physicians. J. Marketing Res. 58(1):115–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hadar L, Sood S (2014) When knowledge is demotivating: Subjective knowledge and choice overload. Psych. Sci. 25(9):1739–1747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoban PR, Bucklin RE (2015) Effects of internet display advertising in the purchase funnel: Model-based insights from a randomized field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 52(3):375–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E (2014) Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):847–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosanagar K, Fleder D, Lee D, Buja A (2014) Will the global village fracture into tribes? Recommender systems and their effects on consumer fragmentation. Management Sci. 60(4):805–823.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hu K, Wang YI (2022) More or less: How information richness affects our decision consistency. Preprint, submitted January 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4013872.Google Scholar
  • Inbar Y, Botti S, Hanko K (2011) Decision speed and choice regret: When haste feels like waste. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(3):533–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Irons B, Hepburn C (2007) Regret theory and the tyranny of choice. Econom. Rec. 83(261):191–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (2000) When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(6):995–1006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacoby J, Speller DE, Berning CK (1974) Brand choice behavior as a function of information load: Replication and extension. J. Consumer Res. 1(1):33–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang ZZ, Kong G, Zhang Y (2021) Making the most of your regret: Workers’ relocation decisions in on-demand platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):695–713.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson GA, Lewis RA, Nubbemeyer EI (2017) Ghost ads: Improving the economics of measuring online ad effectiveness. J. Marketing Res. 54(6):867–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khern-am nuai W, So H, Cohen MC, Adulyasak Y (2024) Selecting cover images for restaurant reviews: AI vs. wisdom of the crowd. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(1):330–349.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM (2010) When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2013) When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. J. Marketing Res. 50(5):561–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee BK, Lee WN (2004) The effect of information overload on consumer choice quality in an on-line environment. Psych. Marketing 21(3):159–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levav J, Heitmann M, Herrmann A, Iyengar SS (2010) Order in product customization decisions: Evidence from field experiments. J. Political Econom. 118(2):274–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li S, Lu LX, Lu SF, Huang S (2023) Estimating the stockout-based demand spillover effect in a fashion retail setting. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(2):468–488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Luo X, Lu X, Moriguchi T (2021) The double-edged effects of e-commerce cart retargeting: Does retargeting too early backfire? J. Marketing 85(4):123–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econom. J. (London) 92(368):805–824.Google Scholar
  • Lu Y, Musalem A, Olivares M, Schilkrut A (2013) Measuring the effect of queues on customer purchases. Management Sci. 59(8):1743–1763.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lü L, Medo M, Yeung CH, Zhang YC, Zhang ZK, Zhou T (2012) Recommender systems. Phys. Rep. 519(1):1–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Luo X, Lu X, Li J (2019) When and how to leverage e-commerce cart targeting: The relative and moderated effects of scarcity and price incentives with a two-stage field experiment and causal forest optimization. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1203–1227.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moon K, Bimpikis K, Mendelson H (2018) Randomized markdowns and online monitoring. Management Sci. 64(3):1271–1290.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Musalem A, Olivares M, Bradlow ET, Terwiesch C, Corsten D (2010) Structural estimation of the effect of out-of-stocks. Management Sci. 56(7):1180–1197.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ngwe D, Ferreira KJ, Teixeira T (2019) The impact of increasing search frictions on online shopping behavior: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 56(6):944–959.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pattabhiramaiah A, Overby E, Xu L (2022) Spillovers from online engagement: How a newspaper subscriber’s activation of digital paywall access affects her retention and subscription revenue. Management Sci. 68(5):3528–3548.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pocheptsova A, Amir O, Dhar R, Baumeister RF (2009) Deciding without resources: Resource depletion and choice in context. J. Marketing Res. 46(3):344–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reutskaja E, Hogarth RM (2009) Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When “goods satiate”. Psych. Marketing 26(3):197–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rieskamp J, Busemeyer JR, Mellers BA (2006) Extending the bounds of rationality: Evidence and theories of preferential choice. J. Econom. Literature 44(3):631–661.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rios I, Saban D, Zheng F (2022) Improving match rates in dating markets through assortment optimization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(4):1304–1323.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sagi A, Friedland N (2007) The cost of richness: The effect of the size and diversity of decision sets on post-decision regret. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(4):515–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sahni NS, Narayanan S, Kalyanam K (2019) An experimental investigation of the effects of retargeted advertising: The role of frequency and timing. J. Marketing Res. 56(3):401–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarver T (2008) Anticipating regret: Why fewer options may be better. Econometrica 76(2):263–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scheibehenne B, Greifeneder R, Todd PM (2010) Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. J. Consumer Res. 37(3):409–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schrage M (2017) Great digital companies build great recommendation engines. Harvard Bus. Rev. 55(8).Google Scholar
  • Schwartz B, Ward A, Monterosso J, Lyubomirsky S, White K, Lehman DR (2002) Maximizing vs. satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(5):1178–1197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonsohn U, Nelson LD, Simmons JP (2014) P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 9(6):666–681.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonson I (1992) The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. 19(1):105–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stamatopoulos I, Bassamboo A, Moreno A (2021) The effects of menu costs on retail performance: Evidence from adoption of the electronic shelf label technology. Management Sci. 67(1):242–256.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(3):213–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talluri K, Van Ryzin G (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Sci. 50(1):15–33.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Timmermans D (1993) The impact of task complexity on information use in multi-attribute decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making 6(2):95–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Townsend C, Kahn BE (2014) The “visual preference heuristic”: The influence of visual vs. verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload. J. Consumer Res. 40(5):993–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ursu RM (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wager S, Athey S (2018) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 113(523):1228–1242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang R, Sahin O (2018) The impact of consumer search cost on assortment planning and pricing. Management Sci. 64(8):3649–3666.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wu C, Cosguner K (2020) Profiting from the decoy effect: A case study of an online diamond retailer. Marketing Sci. 39(5):974–995.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zeelenberg M (1999) The use of crying over spilled milk: A note on the rationality and functionality of regret. Philos. Psych. 12(6):325–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang S, Yao L, Sun A, Tay Y (2019) Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM Comput. Surveys 52(1):1–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang DJ, Dai H, Dong L, Qi F, Zhang N, Liu X, Liu Z, Yang J (2020) The long-term and spillover effects of price promotions on retailing platforms: Evidence from a large randomized experiment on Alibaba. Management Sci. 66(6):2589–2609.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.