Scan Based Trading and Bargaining Equilibrium: A Structural Estimation of Supply Chain Profit

References

• Abbott H, Palekar US (2008) Retail replenishment models with display-space elastic demand. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 186(2):586–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akkaş A, Sahoo N (2020) Reducing product expiration by aligning salesforce incentives: A data-driven approach. Production Oper. Management 29(8):1992–2009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akkaş A, Gaur V, Simchi-Levi D (2019) Drivers of product expiration in consumer packaged goods retailing. Management Sci. 65(5):1949–2443.Google Scholar
• Andrews I, Stock JH, Sun L (2019) Weak instruments in instrumental variables regression: Theory and practice. Annu. Rev. Econom. 11:727–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bental B, Demougin D (2010) Declining labor shares and bargaining power: An institutional explanation. J. Macroeconom. 32(1):443–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bethea D (2020) Replenishment is key to effective scan-based trading. TrueCommerce (February 27), https://www.truecommerce.com/blog/replenishment-key-effective-scan-based-trading.Google Scholar
• Binmore K, Rubinstein A, Wolinsky A (1986) The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling. RAND J. Econom. 17(2):176–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonnet C, Bouamra-Mechemache Z (2016) Organic label, bargaining power, and profit-sharing in the French fluid milk market. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 98(1):113–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. Graves S, deKok T, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 227–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP (2004) The allocation of inventory risk in supply chain: Push, pull, and advance-purchase discount contracts. Management Sci. 50(2):222–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi M, Rabinovich E, Richards TJ (2019) Supply chain contracts and inventory shrinkage: An empirical analysis in the grocery retailing industry. Decision Sci. 50(4):694–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collard-Wexler A, Gowrisankaran G, Lee RS (2019) Nash-in-Nash” bargaining: A microfoundation for applied work. J. Political Econom. 127(1):163–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corts KS (1999) Conduct parameters and the measurement of market power. J. Econometrics 88(2):227–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Hyndman K (2019) Multidimensional bargaining and inventory risk in supply chains: An experimental study. Management Sci. 65(3):955–1453.Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Dresner M, Yao Y (2014) Beyond information sharing: An empirical analysis of vendor-managed inventory. Production Oper. Management 23(5):817–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Draganska M, Klapper D, Villas-Boas SB (2010) A larger slice or a larger pie? An empirical investigation of bargaining power in the distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 29(1):57–74.Link, Google Scholar
• Drenik G (2021) Retail ‘pricing fluency’: The science behind price optimization. Forbes (June 15), https://www.forbes.com/sites/garydrenik/2021/06/15/retail-pricing-fluency-the-science-behind-price-optimization/?sh=3fb499f545e3.Google Scholar
• Dukes AJ, Gal-Or E, Srinivasan K (2006) Channel bargaining with retailer asymmetry. J. Marketing Res. 43(1):84–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Lu LX (2013) Supply chain contracting under competition: Bilateral bargaining vs. Stackelberg. Production Oper. Management 22(3):661–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons GJ, Notes A (2000) Consumer response to stockouts. J. Consumer Res. 27(2):249–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horn H, Wolinsky A (1988) Bilateral monopolies and incentives for merger. RAND J. Econom. 19(3):408–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhang YC (2016) The out-of-stock (OOS) effect on choice shares of available options. J. Retailing 92(1):13–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Villas-Boas M (2003) A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 40(1):80–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen C (2011) Less bad than its reputation: Social spending as a proxy for welfare effort in cross-national studies. J. Comparative Policy Anal. 13(3):327–340.Google Scholar
• Koschat MA (2008) Store inventory can affect demand: Empirical evidence from magazine retailing. J. Retailing 84(2):65–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kropf A, Sauré P (2014) Fixed costs per shipment. J. Internat. Econom. 92:166–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li S, Zhu Z, Huang L (2009) Supply chain coordination and decision making under consignment contract with revenue sharing. Internat. J. Production Econom. 120(1):88–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA (2011) Competition and product quality in the supermarket industry. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1539–1591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D, Karlquist A, Lundqvist L, Snickars F, Weibull J, eds. (1978) Modelling the choice of residential location. Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 75–96.Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Co (2019) Perspectives on retail and consumer goods. McKinsey & Company 7:1–96.Google Scholar
• Meza S, Sudhir K (2010) Do private labels increase retailer bargaining power? Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(3):333–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misra S, Mohanty S (2008) Estimating bargaining games in distribution channels. Working paper, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
• Musalem A, Olivares M, Bradlow ET, Terwiesch C, Corsten D (2010) Structural estimation of the effect of out-of-stocks. Management Sci. 56(7):1180–1197.Link, Google Scholar
• Nagarajan M, Bassok Y (2008) A bargaining framework in supply chains: The assembly problem. Management Sci. 54(8):1482–1496.Link, Google Scholar
• Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2000a) A practitioner’s guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demand. J. Econom. Management Strategy 9(4):513–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2000b) Mergers with differentiated products: The case of the ready-to-eat cereal industry. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A, Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards TJ, Hamilton SF (2015) Variety pass-through: An examination of the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal market. Rev. Econom. Statist. 97(10):166–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ru J, Shi R, Zhang J (2018) When does a supply chain member benefit from vendor-managed inventory? Production Oper. Management 27(5):807–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rungtusanatham M, Rabinovich E, Ashenbaum B, Wallin C (2007) Vendor-owned inventory management arrangements in retail: An agency theory perspective. J. Bus. Logist. 28(1):111–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneemann S, Deutscher C (2017) Intermediate information, loss aversion, and effort: Empirical evidence. Econom. Inquiry 55(4):1759–1770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaffer G, Zettelmeyer F (2004) Advertising in a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 23(4):619–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Slade ME (1995) Product rivalry with multiple strategic weapons: An analysis of price and advertising competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy 4(3):445–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strobl E, Walsh F (2007) Estimating the shirking model with variable effort. Labour Econom. 14(3):623–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train K (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas SB (2007) Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: Inference with limited data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(2):625–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM, Zhao Y (2005) Retailers, manufacturers, and individual consumers: Modeling the supply side in the ketchup marketplace. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Chung DJ (2020) Price bargaining and competition in online platforms: An empirical analysis of the daily deal market. Marketing Sci. 39(4):669–848.Link, Google Scholar