Should We All Work in Sprints? How Agile Project Management Improves Performance

References

• Bandura A (1989) Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. Pervin LA, ed. Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 19–85.Google Scholar
• Boudreau J, Hopp W, McClain JO, Thomas LJ (2003) On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(3):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Springer, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doerr KH, Gue KR (2013) A performance metric and goal-setting procedure for deadline-oriented processes. Production Oper. Management 22(3):726–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ettlie JE (1998) R&D and global manufacturing performance. Management Sci. 44(1):1–11.Link, Google Scholar
• Fan J, Gómez-Miñambres J (2020) Nonbinding goals in teams: A real effort coordination experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(5):1026–1044.Link, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forsyth DK, Burt CDB (2008) Allocating time to future tasks: The effect of task segmentation on planning fallacy bias. Memory Cognition 36(4):791–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu R, Subramanian A, Venkateswaran A (2016) Project characteristics, incentives, and team production. Management Sci. 62(3):785–801.Link, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse V (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse V (2019) Measuring costly effort using the slider task. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 21:1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T, Kerr M, Medvec VH (1993) Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(4):552–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goerg SJ, Kube S (2012) Goals (th)at work: Goals, monetary incentives, and workers’ performance. Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Goh J, Hall NG (2013) Total cost control in project management via satisficing. Management Sci. 59(6):1354–1372.Link, Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne Y, Erat S, Wooten J (2018) New product development and project management decisions. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations, vol. 81 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall NG (2016) Research and teaching opportunities in project management. Gupta A, Capponi A, eds. Optimization Challenges in Complex, Networked and Risky Systems, TutORials in Operations Research (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 329–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsiaw A (2013) Goal-setting and self-control. J. Econom. Theory 148(2):601–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huchzermeier A, Loch CH (2001) Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D. Management Sci. 47(1):85–101.Link, Google Scholar
• Kagan E, Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2018) Ideation–execution transition in product development: An experimental analysis. Management Sci. 64(5):2238–2262.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Stud. Management Sci. 12:313–327.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerzner H (2013) Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 11th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kettunen J, Lejeune M (2020) Technical note—Waterfall and agile product development approaches: Disjunctive stochastic programming formulations. Oper. Res. 68(5):1356–1363.Link, Google Scholar
• LaPorte RE, Nath R (1976) Role of performance goals in prose learning. J. Ed. Psych. 68(3):260–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psych. 57(9):705–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsui T, Okada A, Inoshita O (1983) Mechanism of feedback affecting task performance. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 31(1):114–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkinson CN (1957) Parkinson’s Law and Other Studies in Administration (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Pasmore WA (1988) Designing Effective Organizations: The Sociotechnical Systems Perspective (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Pezzo SP, Pezzo MV, Stone ER (2006) The social implications of planning: How public predictions bias future plans. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42(2):221–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (2017) Pulse of the profession: Success rates rise—Transforming the high cost of low performance. Report, Newtown Square, PA.Google Scholar
• Royce WW (1987) Managing the development of large software systems: Concepts and techniques. Riddle WE, ed. Proc. 9th Internat. Conf. Software Engrg. (IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC), 328–338.Google Scholar
• Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwaber K, Sutherland J (2017) The Scrum guide™: The definitive guide to Scrum: The rules of the game. Report. https://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2017/2017-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf.Google Scholar
• Scrum Alliance (2015) The 2015 state of Scrum report. Report, Scrum Alliance, Westminster, CO.Google Scholar
• Thummadi V, Lyytinen K, Berente N (2012) Iterations in software development processes: A comparison of agile and waterfall software development projects. AIS Special Interest Group on IT Project Management, ed. Proc. 7th Internat. Res. Workshop IT Project Management (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 5–15.Google Scholar
• Weingarten E, Bhatia S, Mellers B (2019) Multiple goals as reference points: One failure makes everything else feel worse. Management Sci. 65(7):3337–3352.Link, Google Scholar
• Wood RE, Mento AJ, Locke EA (1987) Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 72(3):416–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Ramachandran K, Krishnan V (2014) Managing cost salience and procrastination in projects: Compensation and team composition. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1299–1311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zangwill WI, Kantor PB (1998) Toward a theory of continuous improvement and the learning curve. Management Sci. 44(7):910–920.Link, Google Scholar
• Zeigarnik B (1938) On finished and unfinished tasks. Ellis WD, ed. A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology (Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company, London), 300–314.Crossref, Google Scholar