From Targeting to Transfer: Design of Allocation Rules in Cash Transfer Programs

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1101

References

  • Adato M, Hoddinott J (2010) Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America (International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC). https://www.ifpri.org/publication/conditional-cash-transfers-latin-america.Google Scholar
  • Aiken E, Bellue S, Karlan D, Udry CR, Blumenstock J (2022) Machine learning and mobile phone data can improve the targeting of humanitarian assistance. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04484-9.Google Scholar
  • Alkire S, Santos ME (2014) Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: Robustness and scope of the multidimensional poverty index. World Development 59:251–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvi E, Senbeta A (2012) Does foreign aid reduce poverty? J. Internat. Development 24(8):955–976.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atkinson AB (1987) On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica 55(4):749–764.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basurto MP, Dupas P, Robinson J (2020) Decentralization and efficiency of subsidy targeting: Evidence from chiefs in rural Malawi. J. Public Econom. 185:104047.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beegle K, Galasso E, Goldberg J (2017) Direct and indirect effects of Malawi’s public works program on food security. J. Development Econom. 128:1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2002) Robust optimization–methodology and applications. Math. Programming 92(3):453–480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Bertsimas D, Brown DB (2010) A soft robust model for optimization under ambiguity. Oper Res. 58(4 part 2):1220–1234.Google Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust Optimization (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berenguer G, Shen Z-J (2019) Challenges and strategies in managing nonprofit operations: An operations management perspective. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(5):888–905.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Brown DB, Caramanis C (2011) Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Rev. 53(3):464–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besley T (1990) Means testing vs. universal provision in poverty alleviation programmes. Economica 57(225):119–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bijkerk M (2018) A fair distribution algorithm for cash transfer programs. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  • Brill ED Jr (1979) The use of optimization models in public-sector planning. Management Sci. 25(5):413–422.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camacho A, Conover E (2011) Manipulation of social program eligibility. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 3(2):41–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castillo JG (2021) Deciding between cash-based and in-kind distributions during humanitarian emergencies. J. Humanitarian Logist. Supply Chain Management 11(2):272–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cesa-Bianchi N, Lugosi G (2006) Prediction, Learning, and Games (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Datt G, Ravallion M (1992) Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures: A decomposition with applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s. J. Development Econom. 38(2):275–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis B, Handa S, Hypher N, Rossi NW, Winters P, Yablonski J (2016) From Evidence to Action: The Story of Cash Transfers and Impact Evaluation in Sub Saharan Africa (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donsker MD Varadhan SRS (1975) On a variational formula for the principal eigenvalue for operators with maximum principle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72(3):780–783.Google Scholar
  • Doocy S, Tappis H (2017) Cash-based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Rev. 13(1):1–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drèze J, Khera R (2013) Rural poverty and the public distribution system. Econom Political Weekly 48(45-46):55–60.Google Scholar
  • Egger D, Haushofer J, Miguel E, Niehaus P, Walker MW (2022) General equilibrium effects of cash transfers: Experimental evidence from Kenya. Econometrica. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Filmer D, Friedman J, Kandpal E, Onishi J (2021) Cash transfers, food prices, and nutrition impacts on ineligible children. Rev. Econom. Statist. 1–45. https://direct-mit-edu.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/rest/article/doi/10.1162/rest_a_01061/100989/Cash-Transfers-Food-Prices-and-Nutrition-Impacts.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiszbein A, Schady NR (2009) Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty (The World Bank, Washington, DC). https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-0-8213-7352-1.Google Scholar
  • Foster J, Greer J, Thorbecke E (1984) A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52(3):761–766.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grosh M, Baker JL (1995) Proxy means tests for targeting social programs. Living standards measurement study. Working Paper No. 118.Google Scholar
  • Hanna R, Olken BA (2018) Universal basic incomes vs. targeted transfers: Anti-poverty programs in developing countries. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(4):201–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen RT, Miller NH (2008) Giffen behavior and subsistence consumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1553–1577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang J, Wang S, Zhang J (2019) Achieving high individual service-levels without safety stock? Optimal rationing policy of pooled resources. Preprint, submitted May 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3385089.Google Scholar
  • Jolliffe D (2003) On the relative Weil-being of the nonmetropolitan poor: An examination of alternate definitions of poverty during the 1990s. Southern Econom. J. 70(2):295–311.Google Scholar
  • Juditsky A, Nemirovski A (2011) First order methods for nonsmooth convex large-scale optimization. I. General purpose methods. Sra S, Nowozin S, Wright SJ, eds. Optimization for Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), chapter 5.Google Scholar
  • Kozuharov S, Petkovski V (2018) The impact of social transfers on inequality measured by Gini index: The example of Macedonia. UTMS J. Econom. (Skopje) 9(1):49–61.Google Scholar
  • Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22(1):79–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lanjouw P, Ravallion M (1995) Poverty and household size. Econom. J. 105(433):1415–1434.Google Scholar
  • Liao C-N, Chen Y-J (2021) Design of long-term conditional cash transfer program to encourage healthy habits. Production Oper. Management 30(11):3987–4003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyu G, Cheung WC, Teo C-P, Wang H (2019a) Multi-objective online ride-matching. Preprint, submitted March 20, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3356823.Google Scholar
  • Lyu G, Chou MC, Teo C-P, Zheng Z, Zhong Y (2021) Stochastic knapsack revisited: The service level perspective. Oper. Res., ePub ahead of print December 1, https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2173.Google Scholar
  • Lyu G, Cheung W-C, Chou MC, Teo C-P, Zheng Z, Zhong Y (2019b) Capacity allocation in flexible production networks: Theory and applications. Management Sci. 65(11):5091–5109.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ma W, Xu P, Xu Y (2021) Group-level fairness maximization in onlinebipartite matching. Preprint, submitted May 21, https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13908.Google Scholar
  • Manshadi V, Niazadeh R, Rodilitz S (2021) Fair dynamic rationing. Preprint, submitted February 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.01240v2.Google Scholar
  • Marsh MT, Schilling DA (1994) Equity measurement in facility location analysis: A review and framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 74(1):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCoy JH, Lee HL (2014) Using fairness models to improve equity in health delivery fleet management. Production Oper. Management 23(6):965–977.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mercy Corps (2016) Cash transfer programming toolkit. Working paper. https://www.mercycorps.org/sites/default/files/CTP1MethodologyGuide.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Mo J, Walrand J (2000) Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 5:556–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muller C, Bibi S (2010) Refining targeting against poverty evidence from Tunisia. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 72(3):381–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nygaard VM, Sørensen BE, Wang F (2022) Optimal allocations to heterogeneous agents with an application to the stimulus checks. J. Econom. Dynam. Control. 104352.Google Scholar
  • Plagerson S, Ulriksen MS (2015) Cash transfer programmes, poverty reduction and empowerment of women in South Africa. Working paper. https://socialprotection.org/discover/publications/cash-transfer-programmes-poverty-reduction-and-empowerment-women-south-africa.Google Scholar
  • Rawlings LB, Rubio GM (2005) Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. World Bank Res. Observer 20(1):29–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sahinyazan FG, Rancourt M-È, Verter V (2021) Food aid modality selection problem. Production Oper. Management 30(4):965–983.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savas ES (1978) On equity in providing public services. Management Sci. 24(8):800–808.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Soares FV, Ribas RP, Osório RG (2010) Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Familia: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin Amer. Res. Rev. 45(2):173–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soares V, Fábio SS, Medeiros M, Osorio R (2006) Cash transfer programmes in Brazil: Impacts on inequality and poverty. Technical report, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth, Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
  • Thome K, Taylor JE, Filipski M, Davis B, Handa S (2016) The local economy impacts of social cash transfers: A comparative analysis of seven sub-Saharan countries. Working paper, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  • Xie M, Jean N, Burke M, Lobell D, Ermon S (2016) Transfer learning from deep features for remote sensing and poverty mapping. Thirtieth AAAI Conf. Artificial Intell., Phoenix, AZ (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 3929–3935.Google Scholar
  • Young HP (1995) Equity: In Theory and Practice (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhong Y, Zheng Z, Chou MC, Teo C-P (2018) Resource pooling and allocation policies to deliver differentiated service. Management Sci. 64(4):1555–1573.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.