Improving Match Rates in Dating Markets Through Assortment Optimization

References

• Angrist J, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion, 1st ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Rios I, Saban D (2021) Increased transparency in procurement: The role of peer effects. Management Sci. 67(12):7291–7950.Google Scholar
• Berbeglia G, Joret G (2020) Assortment optimisation under a general discrete choice model: A tight analysis of revenue-ordered assortments. Algorithmica 82(4):681–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanchet J, Gallego G, Goyal V (2016) A Markov chain approximation to choice modeling. Oper. Res. 64(4):886–905.Link, Google Scholar
• Caro F, Gallien J (2007) Dynamic assortment with demand learning for seasonal consumer goods. Management Sci. 53(2):276–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Fiszer MD, Kim BJ (2021) Frustration-based promotions: Field experiments in ride-sharing. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print August 31, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.3991.Google Scholar
• Cui R, Zhang DJ, Bassamboo A (2019) Learning from inventory availability information: Evidence from field experiments on Amazon. Management Sci. 65(3):1216–1235.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis JM, Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2014) Assortment optimization under variants of the nested logit model. Oper. Res. 62(2):250–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. (2019) The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby WJ, Katok E (2019) Behavioral research in competitive bidding and auction design. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 525–553.Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Katok E (2006) E-sourcing in procurement: Theory and behavior in reverse auctions with noncompetitive contracts. Management Sci. 52(4):581–596.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Iyengar SS, Kamenica E, Simonson I (2006) Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):673–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Iyengar SS, Kamenica E, Simonson I (2008) Racial preferences in dating. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(1):117–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallino S, Moreno A (2018) The value of fit information in online retail: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):767–787.Link, Google Scholar
• Golrezaei N, Nazerzadeh H, Rusmevichientong P (2014) Real-time optimization of personalized assortments. Management Sci. 60(6):1532–1551.Link, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Piskorski MJ, Yildirim P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of search platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Hirano K, Imbens GW, Ridder G (2003) Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71(4):1161–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitsch G, Hortaçsu A, Ariely D (2010a) Matching and sorting in online dating. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):130–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitsch GJ, Hortaçsu A, Ariely D (2010b) What makes you click? Mate preferences in online dating. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(4):393–427.Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Saban D (2021) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms: Restricting agents’ actions. Management Sci. 67(10):5969–6627.Google Scholar
• Katok E, Olsen T, Pavlov V (2014) Wholesale pricing under mild and privately known concerns for fairness. Production Oper. Management 23(2):285–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kök AG, Fisher ML, Vaidyanathan R (2015) Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Agrawal N, Smith SA, eds. Retail Supply Chain Management: Quantitative Models and Empirical Studies (Springer, Boston), 175–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Niederle M (2014) Propose with a rose? Signaling in internet dating markets. Experiment. Econom. 18(4):731–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M (2018) Online dating industry: The business of love. Accessed November 11, 2019, https://www.toptal.com/finance/business-model-consultants/online-dating-industry.Google Scholar
• Martinez M, Neilson C, Larroucau T, Rios I (2021) Application mistakes and information frictions in college admissions. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• McAlister L (1982) A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety-seeking behavior. J. Consumer Res. 9(2):141–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ovchinnikov A (2019) Incorporating customer behavior into operational decisions. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 587–617.Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2016) Markdown or everyday low price? The role of behavioral motives. Management Sci. 62(2):326–346.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld MJ, Thomas RJ, Hausen S (2019) Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(36):17753–17758.Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P, Shen ZJM, Shmoys DB (2010) Dynamic assortment optimization with a multinomial logit choice model and capacity constraint. Oper. Res. 58(6):1666–1680.Link, Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P, Shmoys D, Tong C, Topaloglu H (2014) Assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with random choice parameters. Production Oper. Management 23(11):2023–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Teng N, Netessine S (2019) Philanthropic campaigns and customer behavior: Field experiments on an online taxi booking platform. Management Sci. 65(2):913–932.Link, Google Scholar
• Talluri K, van Ryzin G (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Sci. 50(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Simonson I (1993) Context-dependent preferences. Management Sci. 39(10):1179–1189.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang R (2018) When prospect theory meets consumer choice models: Assortment and pricing management with reference prices. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(3):583–600.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Sahin O (2018) The impact of consumer search cost on assortment planning and pricing. Management Sci. 64(8):3649–3666.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu J (2018) Search, selectivity, and market thickness in two-sided markets. Working paper, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar