A Classification of Carbon Abatement Opportunities of Global Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1115

References

  • Aflaki S, Kleindorfer PR, de Miera Polvorinos VS (2013) Finding and implementing energy efficiency projects in industrial facilities. Production Oper. Management 22(3):503–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson ST, Newell RG (2004) Information programs for technology adoption: The case of energy-efficiency audits. Resour. Energy Econom. 26(1):27–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blanco CC (2021) Supply chain carbon footprinting and climate change disclosures of global firms. Production Oper. Management 30(9):3143–3160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blanco C, Caro F, Corbett CJ (2016) The state of supply chain carbon footprinting: Analysis of CDP disclosures by US firms. J. Clean. Production 135:1189–1197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blanco C, Caro F, Corbett CJ (2020) Do carbon abatement opportunities become less profitable over time? A global firm-level perspective using CDP data. Energy Policy 138:111252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blass V, Corbett CJ, Delmas MA, Muthulingam S (2014) Top management and the adoption of energy efficiency practices: Evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in the US. Energy 65:560–571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
  • Büschken J, Allenby GM (2016) Sentence-based text analysis for customer reviews. Marketing Sci. 35(6):953–975.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caro F, Corbett CJ, Tan T, Zuidwijk R (2013) Double counting in supply chain carbon footprinting. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):545–558.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • CDP (2018) About us. Accessed August 20, https://www.cdp.net/en/companies-discloser.Google Scholar
  • CDP (2020) Our work. Accessed March 9, https://www.cdp.net/en/climate.Google Scholar
  • Chen L, Mankad S (2022) A structural topic sentiment model for text analysis. Preprint, submitted April 6, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4020651.Google Scholar
  • Cleary S (1999) The relationship between firm investment and financial status. J. Finance 54(2):673–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20(1):37–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Harshman R (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 41(6):391–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dowell GW, Muthulingam S (2017) Will firms go green if it pays? The impact of disruption, cost, and external factors on the adoption of environmental initiatives. Strategic Management J. 38(6):1287–1304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drake DF (2018) Carbon tariffs: Effects in settings with technology choice and foreign production cost advantage. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):667–686.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Enkvist PA, Dinkel J, Lin C (2010) Impact of the Financial Crisis on Carbon Economics: Version 2.1 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve (McKinsey & Company, New York), 374.Google Scholar
  • Enkvist PA, Nauclér T, Rosander J (2007) A cost curve for greenhouse gas reduction. McKinsey Quart. (1):36.Google Scholar
  • Fazzari S, Hubbard RG, Petersen BC (1988) Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1988(1):141–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flammer C (2021) Corporate green bonds. J. Financial Econom. 142(2):499–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleiter T, Schleich J, Ravivanpong P (2012) Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs—An empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany. Energy Policy 51:863–875.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerarden T, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2015) Deconstructing the energy-efficiency gap: Conceptual frameworks and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):183–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gillingham K, Newell RG, Palmer K (2009) Energy efficiency economics and policy. Annual Rev. Resour. Econom. 1(1):597–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gillingham K, Stock JH (2018) The cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(4):53–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gopalakrishnan S, Granot D, Granot F, Sošić G, Cui H (2021) Incentives and emission responsibility allocation in supply chains. Management Sci. 67(7):4172–4190.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang H, Narayanan S, Swaminathan JM (2020a) Carrot or stick? Supplier diversity and its impact on carbon emission reduction strategies. Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise Research Paper.Google Scholar
  • Huang H, Sunar N, Swaminathan JM (2020b) Do noisy customer reviews discourage platform sellers? Empirical analysis of an online solar marketplace. Preprint, submitted August 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3645605.Google Scholar
  • Jaffe AB, Stavins RN (1994) The energy-efficiency gap: What does it mean? Energy Policy 22(10):804–810.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jira C, Toffel MW (2013) Engaging supply chains in climate change. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):559–577.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan SN, Zingales L (1997) Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):169–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keskin NB, Li Y, Sunar N (2022) Data-driven clustering and feature-based retail electricity pricing with smart meters. Preprint, submitted March 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3686518.Google Scholar
  • Kim H, Allenby GM (2022) Integrating textual information into models of choice and scaled response data. Marketing Sci.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kok N, McGraw M, Quigley JM (2011) The diffusion of energy efficiency in building. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):77–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koomey JG, Sanstad AH (1994) Technical evidence for assessing the performance of markets affecting energy efficiency. Energy Policy 22(10):826–832.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kroes J, Subramanian R, Subramanyam R (2012) Operational compliance levers, environmental performance, and firm performance under cap and trade regulation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):186–201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovins AB, Lovins LH (1991) Least-cost climatic stabilization. Annual Rev. Energy Environ. 16(1):433–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mankad S, Han HS, Goh J, Gavirneni S (2016) Understanding online hotel reviews through automated text analysis. Service Sci. 8(2):124–138.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Meier A (1982) The cost of conserved energy as an investment statistic. Technical report, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  • Mills E, Wilson D, Johansson TB (1991) Getting started: No-regrets strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 19(6):526–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muthulingam S, Corbett CJ, Benartzi S, Oppenheim B (2013) Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):596–615.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nauclér T, Enkvist PA (2009) Pathways to a low-carbon economy: Version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve (McKinsey & Company).Google Scholar
  • Subramanian R, Gupta S, Talbot B (2007) Compliance strategies under permits for emissions. Production Oper. Management 16(6):763–779.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunar N (2016) Emissions allocation problems in climate change policies. Atasu A, ed. Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (Springer), 261–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunar N, Plambeck E (2016) Allocating emissions among co-products: Implications for procurement and climate policy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(3):414–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S (2012) The ranking of negative-cost emissions reduction measures. Energy Policy 48:430–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward D (2014) The failure of marginal abatement cost curves in optimising a transition to a low carbon energy supply. Energy Policy 73:820–822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.