Sourcing Innovation: When to Own and When to Control Your Supplier

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0312

References

  • Ahmadjian C, Lincoln J (2001) Keiretsu, governance, and learning: Case studies in change from the Japanese automotive industry. Organ. Sci. 12(6):683–701.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmadjian C, Oxley J (2011) Vertical relationships, hostages, and supplier performance: Evidence from the Japanese automotive industry. J. Law Econom. Organ. 29(3):485–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2019) Innovation and crowdsourcing contests. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 379–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2021) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. Production Oper. Management 30(6):1772–1784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amann C (2024) Volkswagen, quantumscape strike deal on solid-state batteries. Reuters (July 11), https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/volkswagen-ramp-up-solid-state-battery-production-quantumscape-deal-2024-07-11/.Google Scholar
  • Anderson B (2020) Arcfox Alpha-T lands in China with two electric motors and 406 miles of range. CARSCOOPS (April 30), https://www.carscoops.com/2020/04/arcfox-alpha-t-lands-in-china-with-two-electric-motors-and-406-miles-of-range/.Google Scholar
  • Aoki K, Wilhelm M (2017) The role of ambidexterity in managing buyer-supplier relationships: The Toyota case. Organ. Sci. 28(6):1080–1097.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aoyagi M (2010) Information feedback in a dynamic tournament. Game Econom. Behav. 70(2):242–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • BatteryIndustry (2020) SK innovation will supply EV batteries to BAIC. (April 21), https://batteryindustry.net/sk-innovation-will-supply-ev-batteries-to-baic/.Google Scholar
  • Beil D (2010) Supplier selection. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science.Google Scholar
  • Beil D, Wein L (2003) An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process. Management Sci. 49(11):1529–1545.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beil D, Chen Q, Duenyas I, See B (2018) When to deploy test auctions in sourcing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(2):232–248.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Mostagir M (2019) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. 67(2):339–356.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton P, Dewatripont M (2004) Contract Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Boone J (2000) Competitive pressure: The effects on investments in product and process innovation. RAND J Econom. 31(3):549–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T, Levin J (2013) Vertical integration and market structure. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 853–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bristow S, Dunaway M (2011) Process for selecting an ERP system. Read Enterprise Res. Planning 37–49.Google Scholar
  • Burguet R, Perry M (2009) Preferred suppliers in auction markets. RAND J Econom. 40(2):283–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cabral L, Cozzi G, Denicolò V, Spagnolo G, Zanza M (2006) Procuring innovations. Dimitri N, Piga G, Spagnolo G, eds. Handbook of Procurement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 483–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calzolari G, Felli L, Koenen J, Spagnolo G, Stahl K (2019) Trust, competition and innovation: Theory and evidence from German car manufacturers. Working Paper No. 7680, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Candoğan S, Körpeoğlu G, Tang C (2025) Implications of team submissions in open innovation contests. IMA J. Management Math. 36(1):1–19.Google Scholar
  • Chaturvedi A, Martínez-de-Albéniz V (2011) Optimal procurement design in the presence of supply risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):227–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chaturvedi A, Beil D, Martínez-de-Albéniz V (2014) Split-award auctions for supplier retention. Management Sci. 60(7):1719–1737.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Che Y-K, Gale I (2003) Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):646–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Q, Beil D, Duenyas I (2022a) Procurement mechanisms with post-auction pre-award cost-reduction investigations. Oper. Res. 70(6):3054–3075.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W, Dawande M, Janakiraman G (2018) Optimal procurement auctions under multistage supplier qualification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(3):566–582.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Z, Mihm J, Schlapp J (2022b) Sourcing innovation: Integrated system or individual components? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):1056–1073.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough H (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Chowdhury S, Gürtler O (2015) Sabotage in contests: A survey. Public Choice 164(1–2):135–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Claessens S, Djankov S, Lang L (2000) The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. J. Financial Econom. 58(1–2):81–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R, Slagmulder R (1999) Supply Chain Development for the Lean Enterprise. Interorganizational Cost Management (Productivity Press, Portland, OR).Google Scholar
  • Crama P, De Reyck B, Taneri N (2017) Licensing contracts: Control rights, options, and timing. Management Sci. 63(4):1131–1149.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Del Prete D, Rungi A (2017) Organizing the global value chain: A firm-level test. J. Internat. Econom. 109:16–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deng S-J, Elmaghraby W (2005) Supplier selection via tournaments. Production Oper. Management 14(2):252–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dowlah C (2018) Transformations of Global Prosperity: How Foreign Investment, Multinationals, and Value Chains are Remaking Modern Economy (Palgrave Macmillan, Switzerland).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drugov M, Ryvkin D (2017) Biased contests for symmetric players. Game Econom. Behav. 103:116–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J, Ouchi W (1993) Japanese-style partnerships: Giving companies a competitive edge. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 35(1):51–63.Google Scholar
  • Elmaghraby W (2000) Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(4):350–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elmaghraby W (2003) The importance of ordering in sequential auctions. Management Sci. 49(5):673–682.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ely J, Georgiadis G, Khorasani S, Rayo L (2023) Optimal feedback in contests. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(5):2370–2394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein G, Mealem Y, Nitzan S (2011) Political culture and discrimination in contests. J Public Econom. 95(1–2):88–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erat S, Krishnan V (2012) Managing delegated search over design spaces. Management Sci. 58(3):606–623.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • EVSpecifications (2020) The Arcfox α-T by Magna and BAIC is launched during the 2020 Beijing auto show. EVSpecifications (September 27), https://www.evspecifications.com/en/news/b02235b.Google Scholar
  • Fama E, Jensen M (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franks J, Mayer C (2001) Ownership and control of German corporations. Rev Financial Stud. 14(4):943–977.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu Q, Wu Z (2019) Contests: Theory and topics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance (Oxford University Press, UK).Google Scholar
  • Fullerton R, McAfee R (1999) Auctioning entry into tournaments. J Political Econom. 107(3):573–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert RJ, Newbery DMG (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(3):514–526.Google Scholar
  • Greenwood M (2022) Carmakers and AV startups are teaming up to bring driverless vehicles to the road. Engineering.com (May 13), https://www.engineering.com/carmakers-and-av-startups-are-teaming-up-to-bring-driverless-vehicles-to-the-road/.Google Scholar
  • Grossman S, Hart D (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gur Y, Lu L, Weintraub G (2017) Framework agreements in procurement: An auction model and design recommendations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(4):586–603.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hart D, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herh M (2020) SK innovation to supply EV batteries to China’s BAIC group. BusinessKorea (April 21), https://www.businesskorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=44520.Google Scholar
  • Hu B, Qi A (2018) Optimal procurement mechanisms for assembly. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):655–666.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hu M, Wang L (2021) Joint vs. separate crowdsourcing contests. Management Sci. 67(5):2711–2728.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hunold M, Stahl K (2017) Passive vertical integration and strategic delegation. RAND J. Econom. 47(4):891–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Z, Huang Y, Beil D (2021) The role of problem specification in crowdsourcing contests for design problems: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):637–656.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Z, Huang Y, Beil D (2022) The role of feedback in dynamic crowdsourcing contests: A structural empirical analysis. Management Sci. 68(7):4858–4877.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kato T, Nunes B, Dey P (2016) Is keiretsu really a source of competitive advantage for Japanese automotive suppliers? J. Manufacturing Tech. Management 27(1):62–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khorasani S, Körpeoglu E, Krishnan V (2024) Dynamic development contests. Oper Res. 72(1):43–59.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Khorasani S, Nittala L, Krishnan V (2023) Screening in multi-stage contests. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(6):2249–2267.Google Scholar
  • Kim S, Netessine S (2013) Collaborative cost reduction and component procurement under information asymmetry. Management Sci. 59(1):189–206.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkegaard R (2012) Favoritism in asymmetric contests: Head starts and handicaps. Game Econom. Behav. 76(1):226–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konrad K (2002) Investment in the absence of property rights; the role of incumbency advantages. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(8):1521–1537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konrad K (2009) Strategy and Dynamics in Contests (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Körpeoğlu E, Cho S-H (2017) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Körpeoğlu E, Körpeoğlu C, Hafalir I (2022) Parallel innovation contests. Oper Res. 70(3):1506–1530.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Körpeoğlu C, Körpeoğlu E, Tunç S (2021) Optimal duration of innovation contests. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):657–675.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kosaka G, Nakagawa K, Manabe S, Kobayashi M (2020) The vertical keiretsu advantage in the era of Westernization in the Japanese automobile industry: Investigation from transaction cost economics and a resource-based view. Asian Bus. Management 19(1):36–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kostamis D, Beil D, Duenyas I (2009) Total-cost procurement auctions: Impact of suppliers’ cost adjustments on auction format choice. Management Sci. 55(12):1985–1999.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krzeminska A, Hoetker G, Mellewigt T (2013) Reconceptualizing plural sourcing. Strategic Management J. 34(3):1614–1627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kubota Y, Pfanner E (2015) Toyota shakes up a Japanese tradition. Wall Street Journal (October 28), https://www.wsj.com/articles/toyota-shakes-up-a-japanese-tradition-1446057770.Google Scholar
  • Kume H (2020) Tesla teardown finds electronics 6 years ahead of Toyota and VW. Nikkei Asian Review (February 17), https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Most-read-in-2020/Tesla-teardown-finds-electronics-6-years-ahead-of-Toyota-and-VW.Google Scholar
  • Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Langner B, Seidel V (2009) Collaborative concept development using supplier competitions: Insights from the automotive industry. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 26(1–2):1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leech D, Leahy J (1991) Ownership structure, control type classifications and the performance of large British companies. Econom. J. 101(409):1418–1437.Google Scholar
  • Li C (2020) Supplier competition and cost reduction with endogenous information asymmetry. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(5):996–1010.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li C, Debo L (2009) Second sourcing vs. sole sourcing with capacity investment and asymmetric information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(3):448–470.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li C, Wan Z (2017) Supplier competition and cost improvement. Management Sci. 63(8):2460–2477.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liker J, Kamath R, Wasti S, Nagamachi M (1996) Supplier involvement in automotive component design: Are there really large US Japan differences? Res Policy 25(1):59–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln J, Choi E (2010) Strategic alliances in the Japanese economy: Types, critiques, embeddedness, and change. Miyoshi H, Nakata Y, eds. Have Japanese Firms Changed? The Lost Decade (Palgrave Macmillan, UK), 109–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y (2017) Controlling controlling-minority shareholders: Corporate governance and leveraged corporate control. Colum Bus. Law Rev. 2017(2):453–510.Google Scholar
  • Mavrigian M, Carley L (1998) Brake Systems: OEM & Racing Brake Technology (HPBooks, New York).Google Scholar
  • McIvor I, Humphreys P, Cadden T (2006) Supplier involvement in product development in the electronics industry: A case study. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 23:374–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mihm J, Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Sci. 65(2):559–576.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mueller F, Stahl K, Wachtler F (2016) Upstream relationships in the automotive industry: A contractual perspective. Working paper, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Naeher U, Suzuki S, Wiseman B (2011) The evolution of business models in a disrupted value chain. Hasenstab B, ed. McKinsey on Semiconductors (McKinsey & Company).Google Scholar
  • Nalebuff B, Stiglitz J (1983) Prizes and incentives: Towards a general theory of compensation and competition. Bell J. Econom. 14(1):21–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nikkei Asian Review (2016) Japanese carmakers take different roads with supplier networks. Nikkei Asian Review (October 29), https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Japanese-carmakers-take-different-roads-with-supplier-networks.Google Scholar
  • Nittala L, Erat S, Krishnan V (2022) Designing internal innovation contests. Production Oper. Management 31(5):1963–1976.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S, Stern S (2006) How does outsourcing affect performance dynamics? Evidence from the automobile industry. Working paper.Google Scholar
  • Paliwoda S, Bonaccorsi A (1994) Trends in procurement strategies within the European aircraft industry. Industrial Market Management 23(3):235–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmani M, Ramachandran K (2021) Delegating innovation projects with deadline: Committed vs. flexible stopping. Management Sci. 67(10):6317–6332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reinganum J (1983) Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 73(4):741–748.Google Scholar
  • Riordan M (1991) Ownership without control: Toward a theory of backward integration. J. Japan Internat. Econom. 5(2):101–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogerson W (1992) Contractual solutions to the hold-up problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 59(4):777–793.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossini C (1998) English as a Legal Language (Kluwer Law International, Netherlands).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M (2017) Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Scotchmer S (2004) Innovation and Incentives (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Segal I, Whinston M (2013) Property rights. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 100–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shirouzu N (1999) Nissan’s restructuring plan may hurt keiretsu system. Wall Street Journal (October 20), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB940353514227686697.Google Scholar
  • Stouras K, Erat S, Lichtendahl K Jr (2025) Dueling contests and platform’s coordinating role. Management Sci. 71(2):1488–1503.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stouras K, Hutchison-Krupat J, Chao R (2022) The role of participation in innovation contests. Management Sci. 68(6):4135–4150.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tadelis S, Williamson O (2013) Transaction cost economics. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 159–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor C (1995) Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):872–890.Google Scholar
  • Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res Policy 15(6):285–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wan Z, Beil D (2009) RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening. Oper. Res. 57(4):934–949.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wan Z, Beil D, Katok E (2012) When does it pay to delay supplier qualification? Theory and experiments. Management Sci. 58(11):2057–2075.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wijekoon A, Salunke S, Athaide G (2021) Customer heterogeneity and innovation-based competitive strategy: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. J. Production Innovative Management 38(3):315–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilmot S (2019) Volkswagen follows Tesla into battery business. Wall Street Journal (June 13), https://www.wsj.com/articles/volkswagen-follows-tesla-into-battery-business-11560442193.Google Scholar
  • Yang Z, Aydın G, Babich V, Beil D (2012) Using a dual-sourcing option in the presence of asymmetric information about supplier reliability: Competition vs. diversification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):202–217.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yücesan E (2013) An efficient ranking and selection approach to boost the effectiveness of innovation contests. IIE Trans. 45(7):751–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang W, Chen Q, Katok E (2021) “Now or later?” When to deploy qualification screening in open-bid auction for re-sourcing. Oper. Res. 69(6):1715–1733.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zorc S, Tsetlin I, Hasija S, Chick S (2025) The when and how of delegated search. Oper. Res. 73(1):461–482.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.