Coordination for Assembly

References

• Airbus (2024) Standard terms and conditions of purchase and supply. Accessed May 3, 2025, https://www.airbus.com/sites/g/files/jlcbta136/files/2024-11/RPO-NA-USA-BoOTC-GP-AAI-Purchase-Order-Terms-and-Conditions-GP-Airbus-Commercial-US-Law.pdf.Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Goeree JK, Holt CA (2001) Minimum-effort coordination games: Stochastic potential and logit equilibrium. Games Econom. Behav. 34(2):177–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M (2003) Panel Data Econometrics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltagi BH (2008) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, vol. 4 (Springer, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Beer R, Qi A (2024) To communicate or not? Interfirm communication in collaborative projects. Management Sci. 70(5):3225–3244.Link, Google Scholar
• Bellamy W III (2020) Digital threads, IOT sensors driving aerospace supply chain adoption of industry 4.0. Accessed May 3, 2025, https://www.aviationtoday.com/2020/08/03/digitalthreads-iot-sensors-driving-aerospace-supply-chain-adoption-industry-4-0/.Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) 57(1):289–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berninghaus SK, Ehrhart KM (1998) Time horizon and equilibrium selection in tacit coordination games: Experimental results. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 37(2):231–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, DeCroix GA (2004) Decentralized pricing and capacity decisions in a multitier system with modular assembly. Management Sci. 50(9):1293–1308.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran SR, Krishnan V (2009) Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development. Management Sci. 55(7):1152–1169.Link, Google Scholar
• Boeing (2003) Boeing taps supplier assessment solution. Accessed March 14, 2025, https://www.sdcexec.com/sourcing-procurement/news/10353384/the-boeing-co-boeing-taps-supplier-assessment-solution.Google Scholar
• Boeing (2024) Quality management system: Requirements. Accessed March 14, 2025, https://www.boeingsuppliers.com/content/dam/boeing/boeingsuppliers/boeing-suppliers/becoming/quality/D6-87282_Quality_Management_System.pdf.Google Scholar
• Boeing 787–8 Critical Systems Review Team (2014) Boeing 787-8 design, certification, and manufacturing systems review. Accessed March 14, 2025, https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/about/plans_reports/787_Report_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper DJ (2006) Observability and overcoming coordination failure in organizations: An experimental study. Experiment. Econom. 9(4):407–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Camerer CF (1996) Loss-avoidance and forward induction in experimental coordination games. Quart. J. Econom. 111(1):165–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Ho TH (1999) Experience‐weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67(4):827–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen R, Chen Y (2011) The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2562–2589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen T, Klastorin T, Wagner MR (2015) Incentive contracts in serial stochastic projects. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(3):290–301.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li SX, Liu TX, Shih M (2014) Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation. Games Econom. Behav. 84:58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper R, DeJong DV, Forsythe R, Ross TW (1992) Communication in coordination games. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):739–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP (1995) Adaptive dynamics in coordination games. Econometrica 63(1):103–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó P, Fréchette GR, Kim J (2021) The determinants of efficient behavior in coordination games. Games Econom. Behav. 130:352–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deck C, Nikiforakis N (2012) Perfect and imperfect real-time monitoring in a minimum-effort game. Experiment. Econom. 15(1):71–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devetag G (2005) Precedent transfer in coordination games: An experiment. Econom. Lett. 89(2):227–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devetag G, Ortmann A (2007) When and why? A critical survey on coordination failure in the laboratory. Experiment. Econom. 10:331–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan J, Gómez-Miñambres J (2020) Nonbinding goals in teams: A real effort coordination experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(5):1026–1044.Link, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerchak Y, Wang Y (2004) Revenue‐sharing vs. wholesale‐price contracts in assembly systems with random demand. Production Oper. Management 13(1):23–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree JK, Holt CA (2005) An experimental study of costly coordination. Games Econom. Behav. 51(2):349–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granot D, Yin S (2008) Competition and cooperation in decentralized push and pull assembly systems. Management Sci. 54(4):733–747.Link, Google Scholar
• Greising D, Johnsson J (2007) Behind Boeing’s 787 delays. Accessed March 14, 2025, https://www.chicagotribune.com/2007/12/08/behind-boeings-787-delays.Google Scholar
• Hyndman K, Honhon D (2020) Flexibility in long-term relationships: An experimental study. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(2):273–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Hyndman K, Kraiselburd S, Watson N (2013) Aligning capacity decisions in supply chains when demand forecasts are private information: Theory and experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(1):102–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaya M, Özer Ö (2009) Quality risk in outsourcing: Noncontractible product quality and private quality cost information. Naval Res. Logist. 56(7):669–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knez M, Camerer C (1994) Creating expectational assets in the laboratory: Coordination in “weakest‐link” games. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):101–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon HD, Lippman SA, McCardle KF, Tang CS (2010) Project management contracts with delayed payments. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(4):692–707.Link, Google Scholar
• Lunsford JL (2008) Boeing CEO fights headwind. Accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB120906014850342063.Google Scholar
• Mitsubishi (2009) Mitsubishi heavy industries to participate in development of “Trent XWB”. Accessed June 20, 2024, https://www.mhi.com/news/0901201272.html.Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay SC, Suryadevara NK (2014) Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities (Springer, Chichester, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Northrop Grumman (2022) NASA’s Artemis I mission sees successful completion. Accessed March 14, 2025, https://news.northropgrumman.com/news/releases/nasas-artemis-i-mission-sees-successful-completion.Google Scholar
• Riechmann T, Weimann J (2008) Competition as a coordination device: Experimental evidence from a minimum effort coordination game. Eur. J. Political Econom. 24(2):437–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusu M, Soare I, Botan M, Dragomirescu A, Militaru C (2019) Fai first article inspection in production activity. INCAS Bull. 11(3):209–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt D, Shupp R, Walker JM, Ostrom E (2003) Playing safe in coordination games: The roles of risk dominance, payoff dominance, and history of play. Games Econom. Behav. 42(2):281–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song JM, Zhao Y, Xu X (2021) Incentives and gaming in collaborative projects under risk-sharing partnerships. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(2):453–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Staib C (2012) AirSupply from SupplyOn connects Airbus with all its suppliers of “flying material”. Accessed March 14, 2025, https://www.supplyon.com/en/news/airsupply-supplyon-connects-airbus-suppliers-flying-material/.Google Scholar
• Straub PG (1995) Risk dominance and coordination failures in static games. Quart. Rev. Econom. Finance 35(4):339–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang CS, Zimmerman JD, Nelson JI (2009) Managing new product development and supply chain risks: The Boeing 787 case. Supply Chain Forum Internat. J. 10(2):74–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):234–248.Google Scholar
• Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO (1993) Asset markets as an equilibrium selection mechanism: Coordination failure, game form auctions, and tacit communication. Games Econom. Behav. 5(3):485–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vince (2023) The problem with NASA’s “new” RS-25 engine. Accessed May 3, 2025, https://thespacebucket.com/the-problem-with-nasas-new-rs-25-engine/.Google Scholar
• Volvo (2008) Volvo Aero and Rolls-Royce sign risk and revenue sharing agreement for Trent XWB. Accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.volvogroup.com/en/news-and-media/news/2008/jul/news-45914.html.Google Scholar
• Wang Y (2006) Joint pricing-production decisions in supply chains of complementary products with uncertain demand. Oper. Res. 54(6):1110–1127.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber RA (2006) Managing growth to achieve efficient coordination in large groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar