The Role of Information, Rewards, and Convenience in Take-Back Programs for Clothing

References

• Abbey JD, Guide VDR (2017) Closed-loop supply chains: A strategic overview. Bouchery Y, Corbett C, Fransoo J, Tan T, eds. Sustainable Supply Chains, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 4 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 375–393.Google Scholar
• Abbey JD, Blackburn JD, Guide VDR Jr (2015) Optimal pricing for new and remanufactured products. J. Oper. Management 36:130–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdulla H, Ketzenberg M, Abbey JD (2019) Taking stock of consumer returns: A review and classification of the literature. J. Oper. Management 65(6):560–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams T, Li Y, Liu H (2020) A replication of beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research—Sometimes preferable to student groups. AIS Trans. Replication Res. 6(1):1–22.Google Scholar
• Aggarwal P (2004) The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. J. Consumer Res. 31(1):87–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal VV, Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN (2019) OM forum—New opportunities for Operations Management research in sustainability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(1):1–12.Link, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Subramanian R (2012) Extended producer responsibility for e-waste: Individual or collective producer responsibility? Production Oper. Management 21(6):1042–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN, Sarvary M (2009) Efficient take-back legislation. Production Oper. Management 18(3):243–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai X, Choi TM, Li Y, Sun X (2023) Implementing trade-in programs in the presence of resale platforms: Mode selection and pricing. Production Oper. Management 32(10):3193–3208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilandzic H, Kalch A, Soentgen J (2017) Effects of goal framing and emotions on perceived threat and willingness to sacrifice for climate change. Sci. Comm. 39(4):466–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloomberg News (2022) The global glut of clothing is an environmental crisis. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/6YN2-G4MZ.Google Scholar
• Blue Jeans Go Green (2025) Recycle your denim - Blue Jeans Go Green program. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/ZC5W-EM2M.Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Kalkanci B (2021) How transparency into internal and external responsibility initiatives influences consumer choice. Management Sci. 67(2):932–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Conner M, Armitage CJ (1998) Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28(15):1429–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhanorkar S, Muthulingam S (2020) Do e-waste laws create behavioral spillovers? Quasi-experimental evidence from California. Production Oper. Management 29(7):1738–1766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ecocult Fashion (2022) Are take-back schemes from fashion brands truly sustainable? Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/979D-6Q93.Google Scholar
• Eileen Fisher (2025) Eileen Fisher Renew. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/PRN3-ZKM7.Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2021) Wear next. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/6R6T-QP2R.Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2022) Recycling and the circular economy: What’s the difference? Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/Q8BH-FXW5.Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (2024) Facts and figures about material waste and recycling. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/R7WM-FNNA.Google Scholar
• Esenduran G, Hill JA, Noh IJ (2020) Understanding the choice of online resale channel for used electronics. Production Oper. Management 29(5):1188–1211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Future Vvorld (2022) We take that back - The challenges of renewal programs in fashion. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/AA63-R7FS.Google Scholar
• Gap (2025) ThredUp x Gap—Closet clean out. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/4HBV-V5EK.Google Scholar
• Greenpeace (2011) The dirty laundry: Unveiling the hazardous chemicals in the textile supply chain. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/TA92-RP53.Google Scholar
• Griskevicius V, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2008) Applying (and resisting) peer influence. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 49(2):84–91.Google Scholar
• Gualandris J, Klassen RD, Vachon S, Kalchschmidt M (2015) Sustainable evaluation and verification in supply chains: Aligning and leveraging accountability to stakeholders. J. Oper. Management 38:1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guide VDR Jr, Van Wassenhove LN (2009) OR forum—The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper. Res. 57(1):10–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Halvorsen B (2008) Effects of norms and opportunity cost of time on household recycling. Land Econom. 84(3):501–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harden CW, Pedersen T, Jensen PDØ (2024) Motivation or inconvenience—What matters most? Understanding recycling behavior of healthcare waste. Cleaner Resp. Consumption 15:100240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardisty DJ, Weber EU (2009) Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. J. Exp. Psych. General 138(3):329–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• H&M (2025) Let’s close the loop—Repair & recycle—H&M. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/Y8SK-W3LQ.Google Scholar
• Iyer ES, Kashyap RK (2007) Consumer recycling: Role of incentives, information, and social class. J. Consumer Behav. Internat. Res. Rev. 6(1):32–47.Google Scholar
• Janakiraman N, Syrdal HA, Freling R (2016) The effect of return policy leniency on consumer purchase and return decisions: A meta-analytic review. J. Retailing 92(2):226–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi PD, Fast NJ (2013) Power and reduced temporal discounting. Psychol. Sci. 24(4):432–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler R (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):728–741.Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Plambeck EL (2020) Managing supplier social and environmental impacts with voluntary versus mandatory disclosure to investors. Management Sci. 66(8):3311–3328.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Ang E, Plambeck EL (2016) Strategic disclosure of social and environmental impacts in a supply chain. Atasu A, ed. Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 3 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 223–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Zheng Y (2021) How supply chain transparency boosts business value. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 63(1):34–40.Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Valdés L, Zheng Y (2018) Supply chain visibility and social responsibility: Investigating consumers’ behaviors and motives. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):617–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Krupka EL, Stephens M (2013) The stability of measured time preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 85:11–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li YJ, Haws KL, Griskevicius V (2019) Parenting motivation and consumer decision-making. J. Consumer Res. 45(5):1117–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Smith P, Adamowicz W (2018) Can stated measures of willingness-to-accept be valid? Evidence from laboratory experiments. J. Environ. Econom. Management 91:133–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord KR (1994) Motivating recycling behavior: A quasiexperimental investigation of message and source strategies. Psych. Marketing 11(4):341–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madewell (2025) Do Well recycle. Accessed February 25, 2025, https://www.madewell.com/c/do-well-recycling/?srsltid=AfmBOorG1lwfdAqAiTZtiAlK0wzjY7Rsxlab_0hvuNpTsoMLH7ho-w_0.Google Scholar
• Makov T, Newman GE (2016) Economic gains stimulate negative evaluations of corporate sustainability initiatives. Nature Climate Change 6(9):844–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKie EC, Ferguson ME, Galbreth MR, Venkataraman S (2018) How do consumers choose between multiple product generations and conditions? An empirical study of iPad sales on eBay. Production Oper. Management 27(8):1574–1594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinsey Research (2022) The state of fashion 2022. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/5PGW-HK8T.Google Scholar
• Miller KM, Hofstetter R, Krohmer H, Zhang ZJ (2011) How should consumers’ willingness to pay be measured? An empirical comparison of state-of-the-art approaches. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):172–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morlet A, Opsomer R, Herrmann S, Balmond L, Gillet C, Fuchs L (2017) A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future. Technical report, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, UK.Google Scholar
• Nielsen IQ Research (2021) Sustainability connects retailers and brands with conscientious consumers. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/23FH-5AWX.Google Scholar
• Palan S, Schitter C (2018) Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. J. Behav. Exp. Finance 17:22–27. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patagonia (2025) Used Patagonia clothing & gear—Worn Wear – Patagonia Worn Wear. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/CN9V-QCMZ.Google Scholar
• Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 70:153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peer E, Rothschild D, Gordon A, Evernden Z, Damer E (2022) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behav. Res. Methods 54(4):1643–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen JA, Kumar V (2009) Are product returns a necessary evil? Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing 73(3):35–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Frederick S, Orsel B, Rahman J (2005) Four score and seven years from now: The date/delay effect in temporal discounting. Management Sci. 51(9):1326–1335.Link, Google Scholar
• Reinhardt F, Casadesus‐Masanell R, Barley L (2014) Patagonia (B). Business case 714-465, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• ReturnGo (2024) A comprehensive guide to managing omnichannel returns. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/XPV5-G3PE.Google Scholar
• SANVT (2024) Can denim jeans be eco-friendly? Infographic & guide. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/G6AF-NFNT.Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2021) Pre-registration: Why and how. J Consumer Psych. 31(1):151–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson D, Power D, Riach K, Tsarenko Y (2019) Consumer motivation for product disposal and its role in acquiring products for reuse. J. Oper. Management 65(7):612–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorkun MF (2018) How do social norms influence recycling behavior in a collectivistic society? A case study from Turkey. Waste Management 80:359–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence A, Pidgeon N (2010) Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environ. Change 20(4):656–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Statista (2025) Fashion worldwide. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/MNK7-S6EW.Google Scholar
• Subramanian R, Subramanyam R (2012) Key factors in the market for remanufactured products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):315–326.Link, Google Scholar
• The North Face (2025) The North Face renewed take-back—The North Face. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/4PQ7-7TJ9.Google Scholar
• ThredUp (2022) ThredUp releases inaugural impact report. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/9A2A-GWQG.Google Scholar
• ThredUp Newsroom (2021) Adidas launches ‘choose to give back’, a resale program enabled by ThredUp—ThredUp newsroom. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/ZVD4-U78Z.Google Scholar
• Timberland (2025) Responsibility—Timberland. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/5FNT-UCSB.Google Scholar
• Ülkü S, Dimofte CV, Schmidt GM (2012) Consumer valuation of modularly upgradeable products. Management Sci. 58(9):1761–1776.Link, Google Scholar
• UNIQLO (2025) Re.uniqlo: A new life for uniqlo clothing and down. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/5CK2-KU6H.Google Scholar
• Voelckner F (2006) An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers’ willingness to pay. Marketing Letters 17(2):137–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber E, Johnson E, Milch K, Chang H, Brodscholl J, Goldstein D (2007) Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: A query-theory account. Psychol. Sci. 18(6):516–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wertenbroch K, Skiera B (2002) Measuring consumers’ willingness to pay at the point of purchase. J. Marketing Res. 39(2):228–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White K, Simpson B (2013) When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors? J. Marketing 77(2):78–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winterich KP, Nenkov GY, Gonzales GE (2019) Knowing what it makes: How product transformation salience increases recycling. J. Marketing 83(4):21–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yahoo News (2022) The average adult has nearly $300 worth of clothes in their closet that they’ve never worn. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/67B8-NS6D.Google Scholar
• Zanjirani Farahani R, Asgari N, Van Wassenhove LN (2022) Fast fashion, charities, and the circular economy: Challenges for operations management. Production Oper. Management 31(3):1089–1114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zappos (2025) Zappos for good - Cotton Blue Jeans Go Green—Zappos.com. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/DU4J-5FQH.Google Scholar
• Zara (2025) Our used clothing donation program—Zara united states. Accessed February 25, 2025, perma.cc/5TVF-EXTX.Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Leung MY, Boriskina S, Tao X (2023) Advancing life cycle sustainability of textiles through technological innovations. Nature Sustainability 6(3):243–253.Crossref, Google Scholar