Robust Generator Maintenance Schedule for Frequency-Secure Power Systems

References

• ABB (2022) Power grids regain missing inertia with synchronous condensers. Technical report, https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=9AKK108467A2882.Google Scholar
• AEMO (2020) Power system requirements. Technical report, Australian Energy Market Operator Limited, https://www.aemo.com.au/-/media/Files/Electricity/NEM/Security_and_Reliability/Power-system-requirements.pdf.Google Scholar
• Aflaki S, Netessine S (2017) Strategic investment in renewable energy sources: The effect of supply intermittency. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):489–507.Link, Google Scholar
• Amini S, Hêmin G, Hassan B, Moshtagh J (2025) An innovative approach for inertia estimation in power grids: Integrating ANN and equal area criterion. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution 19(1):e70041Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badesa L, Teng F, Strbac G (2019) Simultaneous scheduling of multiple frequency services in stochastic unit commitment. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 34(5):3858–3868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basciftci B, Ahmed S, Gebraeel NZ, Yildirim M (2018) Stochastic optimization of maintenance and operations schedules under unexpected failures. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 33(6):6755–6765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Litvinov E, Sun XA, Zhao J, Zheng T (2012) Adaptive robust optimization for the security constrained unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 28(1):52–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birge JR, Louveaux F (2011) Introduction to Stochastic Programming (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busby JW, Baker K, Bazilian MD, Gilbert AQ, Grubert E, Rai V, Rhodes JD, Shidore S, Smith CA, Webber ME (2021) Cascading risks: Understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 77:102106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bynum ML, Hackebeil GA, Hart WE, Laird CD, Nicholson BL, Siirola JD, Watson JP, Woodruff DL (2021) Pyomo—Optimization Modeling in Python, vol. 67 (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Çetinkaya Ü, Yeşil M, Bayındır R, Irmak E (2025) Technical analysis and strategic insights from the 2025 Spain blackout. 2025 13th Internat. Conf. Smart Grid (icSmartGrid) (IEEE), 809–815.Google Scholar
• Chan TC, Shen ZJM, Siddiq A (2018) Robust defibrillator deployment under cardiac arrest location uncertainty via row-and-column generation. Oper. Res. 66(2):358–379.Link, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Ye Y (2010) Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3):595–612.Link, Google Scholar
• Denholm P, Mai T, Kenyon RW, Kroposki B, O’Malley M (2020) Inertia and the power grid: A guide without the spin. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL), Golden, CO.Google Scholar
• Derinkuyu K, Tanrisever F, Kurt N, Ceyhan G (2020) Optimizing day-ahead electricity market prices: Increasing the total surplus for energy exchange Istanbul. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(4):700–716.Link, Google Scholar
• Du P, Mago NV, Li W, Sharma S, Hu Q, Ding T (2020) New ancillary service market for ERCOT. IEEE Access 8:178391–178401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• EIA (2020) Hourly electricity consumption varies throughout the day and across seasons. Accessed April 16, 2025, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=42915.Google Scholar
• Fairley P (2015) Zombie coal plants reanimated to stabilize the grid. IEEE Spectrum (July 24), https://spectrum.ieee.org/zombie-coal-plants-reanimated-to-stabilize-the-grid.Google Scholar
• Fallahi F, Yildirim M, Lin J, Wang C (2021) Predictive multi-microgrid generation maintenance: Formulation and impact on operations & resilience. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 36(6):4979–4991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao R, Kleywegt A (2023) Distributionally robust stochastic optimization with Wasserstein distance. Math. Oper. Res. 48(2):603–655.Link, Google Scholar
• Gholami A, Sun XA (2018) Towards resilient operation of multimicrogrids: An MISOCP-based frequency-constrained approach. IEEE Trans. Control Network Systems 6(3):925–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorbunov A, Peng JCH, Bialek JW, Vorobev P (2022) Can center-of-inertia model be identified from ambient frequency measurements? IEEE Trans. Power Systems 37(3):2459–2462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanasusanto GA, Kuhn D (2018) Conic programming reformulations of two-stage distributionally robust linear programs over Wasserstein balls. Oper. Res. 66(3):849–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang G, Wang J, Chen C, Qi J, Guo C (2017) Integration of preventive and emergency responses for power grid resilience enhancement. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 32(6):4451–4463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirby BJ (2005) Frequency regulation basics and trends. Technical report, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN.Google Scholar
• Kök AG, Shang K, Yücel Ş (2018) Impact of electricity pricing policies on renewable energy investments and carbon emissions. Management Sci. 64(1):131–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Lima RM, Conejo AJ, Giraldi L, Le Maitre O, Hoteit I, Knio OM (2022) Risk-averse stochastic programming vs. adaptive robust optimization: A virtual power plant application. INFORMS J. Comput. 34(3):1795–1818.Link, Google Scholar
• Lohmann T, Rebennack S (2017) Tailored Benders decomposition for a long-term power expansion model with short-term demand response. Management Sci. 63(6):2027–2048.Link, Google Scholar
• Magness B (2021) Review of February 2021 extreme cold weather event–ERCOT presentation. Urgent Board of Directors Meeting, ERCOT (February 24), https://www.scribd.com/document/495904847/Urgent-Board-of-Directors-Meeting-2-24-2021.Google Scholar
• Manshadi SD, Khodayar ME (2018) Risk-averse generation maintenance scheduling with microgrid aggregators. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9(6):6470–6479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matt N (2022) System rate of change of frequency a GHD survey of international views. Technical report, GHD Pty Ltd, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
• Mohajerin Esfahani P, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasserstein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Programming 171(1):115–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NationalgridESO (2022) ESO Data Portal: System Inertia - Dataset | National Grid Electricity System Operator. Accessed April 16, 2025, https://data.nationalgrideso.com/system/system-inertia.Google Scholar
• OFGEM (2020) GSR027: Review of the NETS SQSS Criteria for Frequency Control that drive reserve, response and inertia holding on the GB electricity system. Technical report.Google Scholar
• Papavasiliou A, Oren SS (2013) Multiarea stochastic unit commitment for high wind penetration in a transmission constrained network. Oper. Res. 61(3):578–592.Link, Google Scholar
• Parhizi S, Khodaei A, Shahidehpour M (2016) Market-based versus price-based microgrid optimal scheduling. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9(2):615–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PJM (2018) Manual 12: Balancing operations. Accessed April 16, 2025, http://www.pjm.com/∼/media/documents/manuals/m12.ashx.Google Scholar
• Qi W, Sha M, Li S (2022) When shared autonomous electric vehicles meet microgrids: Citywide energy-mobility orchestration. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(5):2389–2406.Link, Google Scholar
• Rahmaniani R, Ahmed S, Crainic TG, Gendreau M, Rei W (2020) The Benders dual decomposition method. Oper. Res. 68(3):878–895.Link, Google Scholar
• Restrepo JF, Galiana FD (2005) Unit commitment with primary frequency regulation constraints. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 20(4):1836–1842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teng F, Strbac G (2016) Assessment of the role and value of frequency response support from wind plants. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 7(2):586–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas D, Fung J (2022) Measuring downstream supply chain losses due to power disturbances. Energy Econom. 114:106314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wen Y, Li W, Huang G, Liu X (2016) Frequency dynamics constrained unit commitment with battery energy storage. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 31(6):5115–5125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesemann W, Kuhn D, Sim M (2014) Distributionally robust convex optimization. Oper. Res. 62(6):1358–1376.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu OQ, Kapuscinski R (2013) Curtailing intermittent generation in electrical systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):578–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Xiong P, Jirutitijaroen P, Singh C (2016) A distributionally robust optimization model for unit commitment considering uncertain wind power generation. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 32(1):39–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu J, Sun Q, Mo H, Dong D (2022) Online routing for smart electricity network under hybrid uncertainty. Automatica 145:110538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang H, Nagarajan H (2022) Optimal power flow in distribution networks under n–1 disruptions: A multistage stochastic programming approach. INFORMS J. Comput. 34(2):690–709.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Peng JCH, Ye C, Ye ZS, Ding Y (2021) A criterion and stochastic unit commitment towards frequency resilience of power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 37(1):640–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yildirim M, Sun XA, Gebraeel NZ (2016) Sensor-driven condition-based generator maintenance scheduling—Part II. Incorporating operations. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 31(6):4263–4271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Dong J (2022) Building load control using distributionally robust chance-constrained programs with right-hand side uncertainty and the risk-adjustable variants. INFORMS J. Comput. 34(3):1531–1547.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Xiang Y, Zeng B (2021) Multicomponent maintenance optimization: A stochastic programming approach. INFORMS J. Comput. 33(3):898–914.Link, Google Scholar