Blockchain Operations in the Presence of Security Concerns
Published Online:27 Feb 2023https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1197
References
- (2002) Simple random walk. Accessed February 15, 2023, http://www2.math.uu.se/∼sea/kurser/stokprocmn1/slumpvandring_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2014) Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies (O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA).Google Scholar
- (2022) Bitcoin: A natural oligopoly. Management Sci. 68(7):4755–4771.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) OM forum—Distributed ledgers and operations: What operations management researchers should know about blockchain technology. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(2):223–240.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Prism: Deconstructing the blockchain to approach physical limits. Proc. 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conf. Comput. Comm. Security (ACM, New York), 585–602.Google Scholar
- (2019) Toward a functional fee market for cryptocurrencies. Accessed February 15, 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06830.Google Scholar
- (2020) Blockchain attacks analysis and a model to solve double spending attack. Internat. J. Machine Learn. Comput. 10(2):352–357.Google Scholar
- (2021) Decentralized mining in centralized pools. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(3):1191–1235.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Value and design of traceability-driven blockchains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management., ePub ahead of print January 23, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1161.Google Scholar
- (2019) From mining to markets: The evolution of bitcoin transaction fees. J. Financial Econom. 134(1):91–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Optimal algorithms for Byzantine agreement. Proc. 20th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (ACM, New York), 148–161.Google Scholar
- (2015) The bitcoin backbone protocol: Analysis and applications. Annual Internat. Conf. Theory Appl. Cryptographic Techniques (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 281–310.Google Scholar
- (2017) Algorand: Scaling Byzantine agreements for cryptocurrencies. Proc. 26th Sympos. Oper. Systems Principles (ACM, New York), 51–68.Google Scholar
- (1995) Decentralized regulation of a queue. Management Sci. 41(1):163–173.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Rational Queueing (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Monopoly without a monopolist: An economic analysis of the bitcoin payment system. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(6):3011–3040.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1967) Optimum bribing for queue position. Oper. Res. 15(2):304–318.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) The economics of Bitcoin mining, or Bitcoin in the presence of adversaries. The Twelfth Workshop on the Econom. of Inform. Security (WEIS 2013), 21.Google Scholar
- (2022) Redesigning Bitcoin’s fee market. ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 10(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Scaling Nakamoto consensus to thousands of transactions per second. Accessed February 15, 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.03870.Google Scholar
- (1985) An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. J. Political Econom. 93(4):760–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Why bitcoin will fail to scale? Management Sci. 68(10):7323–7349.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Bus. Rev., 21260.Google Scholar
- (2017) Analysis of the blockchain protocol in asynchronous networks. Annual Internat. Conf. Theory Appl. Cryptographic Techniques (Springer), 643–673.Google Scholar
- (2018) The tangle. Accessed February 15, 2023, https://assets.ctfassets.net/r1dr6vzfxhev/2t4uxvsIqk0EUau6g2sw0g/45eae33637ca92f85dd9f4a3a218e1ec/iota1_4_3.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2021) An equilibrium model of the market for Bitcoin mining. J. Political Econom. 129(8):2415–2452.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Project Yellow Paper 151(2014):1–32.Google Scholar
- (2018) An incentive analysis of some Bitcoin fee design. Accessed February 15, 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.02351.Google Scholar

