Sales Information Transparency and Trust in Repeated Vertical Relationships

References

• Acconcia A, Martina R, Piccolo S (2008) Vertical restraints under asymmetric information: On the role of participation constraints. J. Indust. Econom. 56(2):379–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alicke K, Rexhausen D, Seyfert A (2017) Supply Chain 4.0 in consumer goods. McKinsey & Company (April 6), https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/supply-chain-4-0-in-consumer-goods.Google Scholar
• Amornpetchkul T, Duenyas I, Şahin Ö (2015) Mechanisms to induce buyer forecasting: Do suppliers always benefit from better forecasting? Production Oper. Management 24(11):1724–1749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brinkhoff A, Özer Ö, Sargut G (2015) All you need is trust? An examination of inter-organizational supply chain projects. Production Oper. Management 24(2):181–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Kalkanci B (2021) How transparency into internal and external responsibility initiatives influences consumer choice. Management Sci. 67(2):932–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Kim T, Tsay CJ (2017) Creating reciprocal value through operational transparency. Management Sci. 63(6):1673–1695.Link, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Norton MI (2011) The labor illusion: How operational transparency increases perceived value. Management Sci. 57(9):1564–1579.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (1999) Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance. Management Sci. 45(8):1091–1108.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2001) Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. 47(5):629–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Calzolari G, Spagnolo G (2009) Relational contracts and competitive screening. CEPR discussion paper number 7434.Google Scholar
• Chen F (2003) Information sharing and supply chain coordination. de Kok TG Graves SC, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management, vol. 11 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 341–421.Google Scholar
• Choi EW, Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2020) Network trust and trust behaviors among executives in supply chain interactions. Management Sci. 66(12):5823–5849.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MA, Ho TH, Ren ZJ, Terwiesch C (2003) Measuring imputed cost in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Sci. 49(12):1653–1670.Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ (2001) Stochastic inventory systems in a supply chain with asymmetric information: Cycle stocks, safety stocks, and consignment stock. Oper. Res. 49(4):487–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dukes A, Gal-Or E, Geylani T (2017) Bilateral information sharing and pricing incentives in a retail channel. Ha A, Tang C, eds. Handbook of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 5 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 343–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Hatch NW (2004) Using supplier networks to learn faster. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 45(3):45311.Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Ouchi WG (1993) Japanese-style partnerships: Giving companies a competitive edge. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 35(1):3514.Google Scholar
• Ferrantino MJ, Koten EE (2019) Understanding Supply Chain 4.0 and its potential impact on global value chains. Global Value Chain Development Report 2019, 103.Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E (1991a) A common agency with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. 22:274–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E (1991b) Vertical restraints with incomplete information. J. Indust. Econom. 39:503–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E, Geylani T, Dukes AJ (2008) Information sharing in a channel with partially informed retailers. Marketing Sci. 27(4):642–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Grean M, Shaw MJ (2002) Supply chain partnership between P&G and Wal-Mart. Shaw MJ, ed. E-Business Management, Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol. 1 (Springer, Boston), 155–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha AY (2001) Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation. Naval Res. Logist. 48(1):41–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha A, Tang C, eds. (2017) Handbook of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 5 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Ha AY, Tong S, Zhang H (2011) Sharing demand information in competing supply chains with production diseconomies. Management Sci. 57(3):566–581.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Tian L, Xu Y, Zhang F (2016) To share or not to share: Demand forecast sharing in a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 35(5):800–809.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalwani MU, Narayandas N (1995) Long-term manufacturer-supplier relationships: Do they pay off for supplier firms? J. Marketing 59(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N (1996) The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships. Harvard Bus. Rev. (November-December), https://hbr.org/1996/11/the-power-of-trust-in-manufacturer-retailer-relationships.Google Scholar
• Kwon IWG, Suh T (2004) Factors affecting the level of trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. J. Supply Chain Management 40(1):4–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee HL, Whang S (2000) Information sharing in a supply chain. Internat. J. Manufacturing Tech. Management 1(1):79–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li L (2002) Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition. Management Sci. 48(9):1196–1212.Link, Google Scholar
• Li L, Zhang H (2008) Confidentiality and information sharing in supply chain coordination. Management Sci. 54(8):1467–1481.Link, Google Scholar
• Li T, Tong S, Zhang H (2014) Transparency of information acquisition in a supply chain. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(3):412–424.Link, Google Scholar
• Lobel I, Xiao W (2017) Optimal long-term supply contracts with asymmetric demand information. Oper. Res. 65(5):1275–1284.Link, Google Scholar
• Magretta J (1998) The power of virtual integration: An interview with Dell Computer’s Michael Dell. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76(2):72–83.Google Scholar
• Martimort D (1996) Exclusive dealing, common agency, and multiprincipals incentive theory. RAND J. Econom. 27:1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martimort D, Semenov A, Stole L (2017) A theory of contracts with limited enforcement. Rev. Econom. Stud. 84:816–852.Google Scholar
• Mohan B, Buell RW, John LK (2020) Lifting the veil: The benefits of cost transparency. Marketing Sci. 39(6):1105–1121.Link, Google Scholar
• Oh S, Özer Ö (2013) Mechanism design for capacity planning under dynamic evolutions of asymmetric demand forecasts. Management Sci. 59(4):987–1007.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Wei W (2006) Strategic commitments for an optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Sci. 52(8):1238–1257.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2017) Establishing trust and trustworthiness for supply chain information sharing. Ha A, Tang C, eds. Handbook of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 5 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 287–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2018) Trust and trustworthiness. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, New York), 489–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen KY (2011) Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. 57(6):1111–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Ren Y (2014) Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the United States. Management Sci. 60(10):2435–2460.Link, Google Scholar
• Peura H, Yang SA, Lai G (2017) Trade credit in competition: A horizontal benefit. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(2):263–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL, Taylor TA (2007) Implications of breach remedy and renegotiation design for innovation and capacity. Management Sci. 53(12):1859–1871.Link, Google Scholar
• Prajogo D, Olhager J (2012) Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. Internat. J. Production Econom. 135(1):514–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren ZJ, Cohen MA, Ho TH, Terwiesch C (2010) Information sharing in a long-term supply chain relationship: The role of customer review strategy. Oper. Res. 58(1):81–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Shamir N, Shin H (2018) The perils of sharing information in a trade association under a strategic wholesale price. Production Oper. Management 27(11):1978–1995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spengler JJ (1950) Vertical integration and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. 58(4):347–352.Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Plambeck EL (2007) Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. Management Sci. 53(10):1577–1593.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang SA, Bakshi N, Chen CJ (2021) Trade credit insurance: Operational value and contract choice. Management Sci. 67(2):875–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang SA, Birge JR (2018) Trade credit, risk sharing, and inventory financing portfolios. Management Sci. 64(8):3667–3689.Link, Google Scholar
• Yehezkel Y (2008) Retailer’s choice of product variety and exclusive dealing under asymmetric information. RAND J. Econom. 39:115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yehezkel Y (2014) Motivating a supplier to test product quality. J. Indust. Econom. 62:309–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang H (2002) Vertical information exchange in a supply chain with duopoly retailers. Production Oper. Management 11(4):531–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Nagarajan M, Sošić G (2010) Dynamic supplier contracts under asymmetric inventory information. Oper. Res. 58(5):1380–1397.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zenios S (2008) A dynamic principal-agent model with hidden information: Sequential optimality through truthful state revelation. Oper. Res. 56(3):681–696.Link, Google Scholar