Product Recalls and Supply Base Innovation

References

• Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Celik MA (2014) Young, restless and creative: Openness to disruption and creative innovations. NBER Working Paper No. w19894, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 31(3):306–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Mukherjee U, Muthulingam S (2020) Does organizational forgetting affect quality knowledge gained through spillover?—Evidence from the automotive industry. Production Oper. Management 29(4):907–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander L, Van Knippenberg D (2014) Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):423–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD, Waterman RP (2002) Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociol. Methodology 32(1):247–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astvansh V, Ball GP, Josefy M (2022) The recall decision exposed: Automobile recall timing and process data set. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(3):1457–1473.Link, Google Scholar
• Ball G, Siemsen E, Shah R (2017) Do plant inspections predict future quality? The role of investigator experience. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(4):534–550.Link, Google Scholar
• Ball GP, Shah R, Donohue K (2018a) The decision to recall: A behavioral investigation in the medical device industry. J. Oper. Management 62(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball GP, Shah R, Wowak KD (2018b) Product competition, managerial discretion, and manufacturing recalls in the US pharmaceutical industry. J. Oper. Management 58–59(1):59–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellamy MA, Ghosh S, Hora M (2014) The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation. J. Oper. Management 32(6):357–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran SR, Krishnan V (2009) Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development. Management Sci. 55(7):1152–1169.Link, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81(4):1347–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolandifar E, Feng T, Zhang F (2018) Simple contracts to assure supply under noncontractible capacity and asymmetric cost information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(2):217–231.Link, Google Scholar
• Bray RL, Serpa JC, Colak A (2019) Supply chain proximity and product quality. Management Sci. 65(9):4079–4099.Link, Google Scholar
• Byun SK, Oh J-M, Xia H (2021) Incremental vs. breakthrough innovation: The role of technology spillovers. Management Sci. 67(3):1779–1802.Link, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2009) Microeconometrics with Stata (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB (2001) Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organ. Sci. 12(1):19–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Chao GH, Iravani SMR, Savaskan RC (2009) Quality improvement incentives and product recall cost sharing contracts. Management Sci. 55(7):1122–1138.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheah ET, Chan WL, Chieng CLL (2007) The corporate social responsibility of pharmaceutical product recalls: An empirical examination of US and UK markets. J. Bus. Ethics 76(4):427–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ganesan S, Liu Y (2009) Does a firm’s product-recall strategy affect its financial value? An examination of strategic alternatives during product-harm crises. J. Marketing 73(6):214–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho H-J, Pucik V (2005) Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management J. 26(6):555–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi TY, Krause DR (2006) The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. J. Oper. Management 24(5):637–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Tian X, Wang W (2019) Corporate innovation along the supply chain. Management Sci. 65(6):2445–2466.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MA, Lee HL (2020) Designing the right global supply chain network. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):15–24.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport R (2011) SPLC <GO>: Supply chain on Bloomberg. https://business.library.emory.edu/documents/faq-handouts/bloomberg-splc.pdf.Google Scholar
• Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 80(4):549–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faff R, Ho Y-K, Lin W, Yap C-M (2013) Diminishing marginal returns from R&D investment: Evidence from manufacturing firms. Appl. Econom. 45(5):611–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandes AM, Paunov C (2015) The risks of innovation: Are innovating firms less likely to die? Rev. Econom. Statist. 97(3):638–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao H, Hsu P-H, Li K (2018) Innovation strategy of private firms. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 53(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graves SB, Langowitz NS (1993) Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 14(8):593–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray JV, Leiblein MJ, Roth AV (2013) Quality risk in offshore manufacturing: Evidence from pharmaceutical industry. Quality Control Appl. Statist. 58(1):73–74.Google Scholar
• Gray JV, Roth, AV, Leiblein MJ (2011) Quality risk in offshore manufacturing: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. J. Oper. Management 29(7–8):737–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Handley SM, Benton WC Jr (2013) The influence of task-and location-specific complexity on the control and coordination costs in global outsourcing relationships. J. Oper. Management 31(3):109–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D (1996) Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development. Management Sci. 42(6):907–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Rhee M (2004) The role of volition in organizational learning: The case of automotive product recalls. Management Sci. 50(11):1545–1560.Link, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2005) Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Management Sci. 51(5):695–711.Link, Google Scholar
• Hora M, Bapuji H, Roth AV (2011) Safety hazard and time to recall: The role of recall strategy, product defect type, and supply chain player in the US toy industry. J. Oper. Management 29(7–8):766–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houser C (1998) The role of diminishing returns in neo-Schumpeterian growth theory. Econom. Theory 12(2):335–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econom. Literature 47(1):5–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaksson OHD, Simeth M, Seifert RW (2016) Knowledge spillovers in the supply chain: Evidence from the high tech sectors. Res. Policy 45(3):699–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kesavan S, Staats BR, Gilland W (2014) Volume flexibility in services: The costs and benefits of flexible labor resources. Management Sci. 60(8):1884–1906.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Lee J, Mnyshenko O, Shin H (2019) Inclusive innovation: Product innovation in technology supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):327–345.Link, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee HL, Schmidt G (2017) Using value chains to enhance innovation. Production Oper. Management 26(4):617–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Massini S, Peeters C (2011) Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organ. Sci. 22(1):81–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Li G, Rajagopalan S (1998) Process improvement, quality, and learning effects. Management Sci. 44(11):1517–1532.Link, Google Scholar
• Liker JK, Choi TY (2004) Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(12):104–113.Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Shankar V (2015) The dynamic impact of product-harm crises on brand preference and advertising effectiveness: An empirical analysis of the automobile industry. Management Sci. 61(10):2514–2535.Link, Google Scholar
• Long JS, Freese J (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Love JH, Roper S, Vahter P (2014) Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1703–1716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayo K, Ball G, Mills A (2022) CEO tenure and recall risk management in the consumer products industry. Production Oper. Management 31(2):743–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menor LJ, Kristal MM, Rosenzweig ED (2007) Examining the influence of operational intellectual capital on capabilities and performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):559–578.Link, Google Scholar
• Modi SB, Mishra S (2011) What drives financial performance—Resource efficiency or resource slack? Evidence from US based manufacturing firms from 1991 to 2006. J. Oper. Management 29(3):254–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukherjee UK, Ball GP, Wowak KD, Natarajan KV, Miller JW (2021) Hiding in the herd: The product recall clustering phenomenon. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):392–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Muthulingam S, Agrawal A (2016) Does quality knowledge spillover at shared suppliers? An empirical investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(4):525–544.Link, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan R, Narayanan S (2013) Perspectives on supply network-enabled innovations. J. Supply Chain Management 49(4):27–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ooms W, Piepenbrink R (2021) Open innovation for wicked problems: Using proximity to overcome barriers. California Management Rev. 63(2):62–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.Link, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran, T, Han S, Mithas S (2017) Mitigating diminishing returns to R&D: The role of information technology in innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):812–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Rhee M, Haunschild PR (2006) The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the US automobile industry. Organ. Sci. 17(1):101–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Rhee M, Kim Y-C, Han J (2006) Confidence in imitation: Niche-width strategy in the UK automobile industry. Management Sci. 52(4):501–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts N, Galluch PS, Dinger M, Grover V (2012) Absorptive capacity and information systems research: Review, synthesis, and directions for future research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7):1113–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Serpa JC, Krishnan H (2018) The impact of supply chains on firm-level productivity. Management Sci. 64(2):511–532.Link, Google Scholar
• Shah R, Ball GP, Netessine S (2017) Plant operations and product recalls in the automotive industry: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 63(8):2439–2459.Link, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Shane S, Di Gregorio D (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. 49(4):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Sridhar S, Narayanan S, Srinivasan R (2014) Dynamic relationships among R&D, advertising, inventory and firm performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 42(3):277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Choo A, Narayanan S, Sarkar S, Tenhiälä A (2021) Knowledge sources, innovation objectives, and their impact on innovation performance: Quasi-replication of Leiponen and Helfat (2010). Strategic Management J. 42(11):2104–2136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steven AB, Dong Y, Corsi T (2014) Global sourcing and quality recalls: An empirical study of outsourcing-supplier concentration-product recalls linkages. J. Oper. Management 32(5):241–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tagaras G, Lee HL (1996) Economic models for vendor evaluation with quality cost analysis. Management Sci. 42(11):1531–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Tan TF, Netessine S (2019) When you work with a superman, will you also fly? An empirical study of the impact of coworkers on performance. Management Sci. 65(8):3495–3517.Link, Google Scholar
• Thirumalai S, Sinha KK (2011) Product recalls in the medical device industry: An empirical exploration of the sources and financial consequences. Management Sci. 57(2):376–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Vuong QH (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57(2):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson P (2015) The misuse of the Vuong test for non-nested models to test for zero-inflation. Econom. Lett. 127:51–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wowak AJ, Mannor MJ, Wowak KD (2015) Throwing caution to the wind: The effect of ceo stock option pay on the incidence of product safety problems. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1082–1092.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wowak KD, Ball GP, Post C, Ketchen DJ Jr (2021) The influence of female directors on product recall decisions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(4):895–913.Link, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, George G (2002) The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 13(2):147–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Liang K-Y, Albert PS (1988) Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44(4):1049–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zobel A-K, Hagedoorn J (2020) Implications of open innovation for organizational boundaries and the governance of contractual relations. Acad. Management Perspect. 34(3):400–423.Crossref, Google Scholar