Distributional Robustness and Inequity Mitigation in Disaster Preparedness of Humanitarian Operations

References

• Alem D, Clark A, Moreno A (2016) Stochastic network models for logistics planning in disaster relief. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 255(1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altay N (2013) Capability-based resource allocation for effective disaster response. IMA J. Management Math. 24(2):253–266.Google Scholar
• Arnette AN, Zobel CW (2019) A risk-based approach to improving disaster relief asset pre-positioning. Production Oper. Management 28(2):457–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashcroft F (2002) Life at the Extremes: The Science of Survival (University of California Press, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Balcik B, Beamon BM (2008) Facility location in humanitarian relief. Internat. J. Logist. Res. Applications 11(2):101–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• BBC (2016) The slow and deadly dzud in Mongolia. Accessed March 17, 2021, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-35983912.Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Sim M, Zhang M (2019) Adaptive distributionally robust optimization. Management Sci. 65(2):604–618.Link, Google Scholar
• Besiou M, Van Wassenhove LN (2020) Humanitarian operations: A world of opportunity for relevant and impactful research. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):135–145.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Sim M (2009) Satisficing measures for analysis of risky positions. Management Sci. 55(1):71–84.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Sim M, Xiong P (2020) Robust stochastic optimization made easy with RSOME. Management Sci. 66(8):3329–3339.Link, Google Scholar
• CNBC (2019) Hurricane Dorian caused an estimated $1.5 billion to $3 billion worth of damage in the Caribbean. Accessed March 17, 2021, https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/06/hurricane-dorian-caused-billions-worth-of-damage-in-the-caribbean.html.Google Scholar
• de Goyet CdV, Marti RZ, Osorio C (2006) Natural Disaster Mitigation and Relief (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Elçi Ö, Noyan N (2018) A chance-constrained two-stage stochastic programming model for humanitarian relief network design. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 108:55–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• EM-DAT (2020) Em-dat the emergency events database. Accessed March 17, 2021, https://www.emdat.be/.Google Scholar
• Fritz Institute (2005) Logistics and the effective delivery of humanitarian relief. Technical report, Fritz Institute, California.Google Scholar
• Gralla E, Goentzel J, Fine C (2014) Assessing trade-offs among multiple objectives for humanitarian aid delivery using expert preferences. Production Oper. Management 23(6):978–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutjahr WJ, Fischer S (2018) Equity and deprivation costs in humanitarian logistics. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 270(1):185–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holguín-Veras J, Pérez N, Jaller M, Van Wassenhove LN, Aros-Vera F (2013) On the appropriate objective function for post-disaster humanitarian logistics models. J. Oper. Management 31(5):262–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong X, Lejeune MA, Noyan N (2015) Stochastic network design for disaster preparedness. IIE Trans. 47(4):329–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang K, Rafiei R (2019) Equitable last mile distribution in emergency response. Comput. Industrial Engrg. 127:887–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang M, Smilowitz K, Balcik B (2012) Models for relief routing: Equity, efficiency and efficacy. Transportation Res., Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 48(1):2–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IFRC (2018) World disasters report 2018: Leaving no one behind. Technical report, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva.Google Scholar
• Karsu O, Morton A (2015) Inequity averse optimization in operational research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 245(2):343–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Letsios D, Mistry M, Misener R (2021) Exact lexicographic scheduling and approximate rescheduling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 290(2):469–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luss H (1999) On equitable resource allocation problems: A lexicographic minimax approach. Oper. Res. 47(3):361–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Mafusalov A, Uryasev S (2018) Buffered probability of exceedance: Mathematical properties and optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 28(2):1077–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marchi E, Oviedo JA (1992) Lexicographic optimality in the multiple objective linear programming: The nucleolar solution. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 57(3):355–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nace D, Orlin JB (2007) Lexicographically minimum and maximum load linear programming problems. Oper. Res. 55(1):182–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Ni W, Shu J, Song M (2018) Location and emergency inventory pre-positioning for disaster response operations: Min-max robust model and a case study of Yushu earthquake. Production Oper. Management 27(1):160–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noyan N (2012) Risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming with an application to disaster management. Comput. Oper. Res. 39(3):541–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noyan N, Balcik B, Atakan S (2016) A stochastic optimization model for designing last mile relief networks. Transportation Sci. 50(3):1092–1113.Link, Google Scholar
• Ogryczak W, Pióro M, Tomaszewski A (2005) Telecommunications network design and max-min optimization problem. J. Telecomm. Inform. Tech. 3:43–56.Google Scholar
• Ozbay K, Ozguven EE (2007) Stochastic humanitarian inventory control model for disaster planning. Transportation Res. Rec. 2022(1):63–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paul JA, Wang XJ (2019) Robust location-allocation network design for earthquake preparedness. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 119:139–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qi J (2017) Mitigating delays and unfairness in appointment systems. Management Sci. 63(2):566–583.Link, Google Scholar
• Rawls CG, Turnquist MA (2010) Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 44(4):521–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawls CG, Turnquist MA (2011) Pre-positioning planning for emergency response with service quality constraints. OR Spectrum 33(3):481–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2:21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starr MK, Van Wassenhove LN (2014) Introduction to the special issue on humanitarian operations and crisis management. Production Oper. Management 23(6):925–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stauffer JM, Kumar S (2021) Impact of incorporating returns into pre-disaster deployments for rapid-onset predictable disasters. Production Oper. Management 30(2):451–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subaiya S, Moussavi C, Velasquez A, Stillman J (2014) A rapid needs assessment of the Rockaway Peninsula in New York City after hurricane sandy and the relationship of socioeconomic status to recovery. Amer. J. Public Health. 104(4):632–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uichanco J (2022) A model for prepositioning emergency relief items before a typhoon with an uncertain trajectory. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):766–790.Link, Google Scholar
• Velasquez GA, Mayorga ME, Cruz EA (2019) Prepositioning inventory for disasters: A robust and equitable model. OR Spectrum 41(3):757–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu L, Zhang C, Yang H, Miao L (2018) Novel methods for resource allocation in humanitarian logistics considering human suffering. Comput. Industrial Engrg. 119:1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Fukushima M (2009) Worst-case conditional value-at-risk with application to robust portfolio management. Oper. Res. 57(5):1155–1168.Link, Google Scholar