Stability of Procurement Networks

References

• Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2015) Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):564–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afriat SN (1967) The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. Internat. Econom. Rev. 8(1):67–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alstott J, Bullmore E, Plenz D (2014) Powerlaw: A Python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions. PLoS One 9(1):e85777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang E, Iancu DA, Swinney R (2017) Disruption risk and optimal sourcing in multitier supply networks. Management Sci. 63(8):2397–2419.Link, Google Scholar
• ASCM (2023) The KPMG Supply Chain Stability Index, in association with ASCM. Accessed March 7, 2024, https://www.ascm.org/making-an-impact/research/supply-chain-stability-index/.Google Scholar
• Beer R, Rios I, Saban D (2021) Increased transparency in procurement: The role of peer effects. Management Sci. 67(12):7511–7534.Link, Google Scholar
• Bellamy MA, Ghosh S, Hora M (2014) The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation. J. Oper. Management 32(6):357–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bich P, Morhaim L (2020) On the existence of pairwise stable weighted networks. Math. Oper. Res. 45(4):1393–1404.Link, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Candogan O, Ehsani S (2019) Supply disruptions and optimal network structures. Management Sci. 65(12):5504–5517.Link, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Fearing D, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2018) Multisourcing and miscoordination in supply chain networks. Oper. Res. 66(4):1023–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Birge JR, Capponi A, Chen PC (2023) Disruption and rerouting in supply chain networks. Oper. Res. 71(2):750–767.Link, Google Scholar
• Bollobás B (2013) Modern Graph Theory, vol. 184 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Calvó-Armengol A, İlkılıç R (2009) Pairwise-stability and Nash equilibria in network formation. Internat. J. Game Theory 38(1):51–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Candogan O, Epitropou M, Vohra RV (2021) Competitive equilibrium and trading networks: A network flow approach. Oper. Res. 69(1):114–147.Link, Google Scholar
• Chambers CP, Echenique F (2016) Revealed Preference Theory, vol. 56 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi A, Katok E, Beil DR (2019) Split-award auctions: Insights from theory and experiments. Management Sci. 65(1):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Beil DR, Duenyas I (2022) Procurement mechanisms with post-auction pre-award cost-reduction investigations. Oper. Res. 70(6):3054–3075.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Qi A, Dawande M (2020) Supplier centrality and auditing priority in socially responsible supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1199–1214.Link, Google Scholar
• Chu LY, Rong Y, Zheng H (2022) The strategic benefit of request for proposal/quotation. Oper. Res. 70(3):1410–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Crawford I, De Rock B (2014) Empirical revealed preference. Annual Rev. Econom. 6(1):503–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean M, Martin D (2016) Measuring rationality with the minimum cost of revealed preference violations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 98(3):524–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong L, Jiang P, Xu F (2023) Impact of traceability technology adoption in food supply chain networks. Management Sci. 69(3):1518–1535.Link, Google Scholar
• Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 80(4):549–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta B, Ghosal S, Ray D (2005) Farsighted network formation. J. Econom. Theory 122(2):143–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Echenique F, Lee S, Shum M (2011) The money pump as a measure of revealed preference violations. J. Political Econom. 119(6):1201–1223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang X, Cho SH (2014) Stability and endogenous formation of inventory transshipment networks. Oper. Res. 62(6):1316–1334.Link, Google Scholar
• Hatfield JW, Kominers SD, Nichifor A, Ostrovsky M, Westkamp A (2013) Stability and competitive equilibrium in trading networks. J. Political Econom. 121(5):966–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu B, Qi A (2018) Optimal procurement mechanisms for assembly. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):655–666.Link, Google Scholar
• Jackson M (2008) Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO, Van den Nouweland A (2005) Strongly stable networks. Games Econom. Behav. 51(2):420–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson M, Wolinsky A (1996) A strategic model of social and economic networks. J. Econom. Theory 71(1):44–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Plambeck EL (2020) Reveal the supplier list? A trade-off in capacity vs. responsibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1251–1267.Link, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Valdés L, Zheng Y (2018) Supply chain visibility and social responsibility: Investigating consumers’ behaviors and motives. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):617–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Latapy M, Magnien C, Del Vecchio N (2008) Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks. Soc. Networks 30(1):31–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C, Wan Z (2017) Supplier competition and cost improvement. Management Sci. 63(8):2460–2477.Link, Google Scholar
• Lu G, Shang G (2017) Impact of supply base structural complexity on financial performance: Roles of visible and not-so-visible characteristics. J. Oper. Management 53(1):23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacArthur BD, Sánchez-García RJ, Anderson JW (2008) Symmetry in complex networks. Discrete Appl. Math. 156(18):3525–3531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nguyen T, Subramanian V, Berry R (2016) Delay in trade networks. Oper. Res. 64(3):646–661.Link, Google Scholar
• OECD (2021) Government at a glance 2021: Size of public procurement. Accessed March 7, 2024, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/18dc0c2d-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/18dc0c2d-en.Google Scholar
• Osadchiy N, Udenio M, Gaur V (2021) Have supply networks become more fragmented over time? Preprint, submitted June 22, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3867369.Google Scholar
• Ostrovsky M (2008) Stability in supply chain networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):897–923.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page FH Jr, Wooders MH, Kamat S (2005) Networks and farsighted stability. J. Econom. Theory 120(2):257–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richter MK (1966) Revealed preference theory. Econometrica 34(3):635–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1938) A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. Economica 5(17):61–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P (1947) Foundation of Economic Analysis (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sánchez-García RJ (2020) Exploiting symmetry in network analysis. Comm. Phys. 3(1):87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheffi Y (2005) The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sheffi Y, Rice JB Jr (2005) A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(1):41–48.Google Scholar
• Smeulders B, Spieksma FC, Cherchye L, De Rock B (2014) Goodness-of-fit measures for revealed preference tests: Complexity results and algorithms. ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 2(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2020) Public procurement is a powerful tool for sustainable development. Accessed December 29, 2023, https://unctad.org/news/public-procurement-powerful-tool-sustainable-development-un-report.Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau (2023) 2018–2021 annual survey of manufactures (ASM). Accessed March 7, 2024, https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/econ/asm/2018-2021-asm.html.Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1982) The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 50(4):945–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2006) Revealed preference. Szenberg S, Ramrattan L, Gottesman AA, eds. Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 99–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wachs J, Fazekas M, Kertész J (2021) Corruption risk in contracting markets: A network science perspective. Internat. J. Data Sci. Analytics 12(1):45–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Li J, Wu D, Anupindi R (2021) When ignorance is not bliss: An empirical analysis of subtier supply network structure on firm risk. Management Sci. 67(4):2029–2048.Link, Google Scholar
• World Bank (2020) Global public procurement database. Accessed March 7, 2024, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2020/03/23/global-public-procurement-database-share-compare-improve.Google Scholar
• Wu D (2023) Text-based measure of supply chain risk exposure. Management Sci. 70(7):4781–4801.Link, Google Scholar
• Xiao YH, Wu WT, Wang H, Xiong M, Wang W (2008) Symmetry-based structure entropy of complex networks. Physica A Statist. Mech. Appl. 387(11):2611–2619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Aydin G, Parker RP (2022) Social responsibility auditing in supply chain networks. Management Sci. 68(2):1058–1077.Link, Google Scholar