Tides Need STEMMED: A Locally Operating Spatiotemporal Mutually Exciting Point Process with Dynamic Network for Improving Opioid Overdose Death Prediction

References

• Ahmad FB, Cisewski JA, Rossen LM, Sutton P (2025) Provisional drug overdose death counts. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
• Altekruse SF, Cosgrove CM, Altekruse WC, Jenkins RA, Blanco C (2020) Socioeconomic risk factors for fatal opioid overdoses in the United States: Findings from the mortality disparities in American communities study (MDAC). PLoS One 15(1):e0227966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharat C, Hickman M, Barbieri S, Degenhardt L (2021) Big data and predictive modelling for the opioid crisis: Existing research and future potential. Lancet Digital Health 3(6):e397–e407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnert AS, Valenstein M, Bair MJ, Ganoczy D, McCarthy JF, Ilgen MA, Blow FC (2011) Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths. JAMA 305(13):1315–1321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campo DS, Gussler JW, Sue A, Skums P, Khudyakov Y (2020) Accurate spatiotemporal mapping of drug overdose deaths by machine learning of drug-related web-searches. PLoS One 15(12):e0243622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter JG, Mohler G, Ray B (2019) Spatial concentration of opioid overdose deaths in Indianapolis: An application of the law of crime concentration at place to a public health epidemic. J. Contemporary Criminal Justice 35(2):161–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Larochelle MR, Weaver DT, Lietz AP, Mueller PP, Mercaldo S, Wakeman SE, et al. (2019) Prevention of prescription opioid misuse and projected overdose deaths in the United States. JAMA Network Open 2(2):e187621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Dong Z, Xie Y (2025) Deep spatio-temporal point processes: Advances and new directions. Preprint, submitted April 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06364.Google Scholar
• Chiang WH, Liu X, Mohler G (2022) Hawkes process modeling of COVID-19 with mobility leading indicators and spatial covariates. Internat. J. Forecasting 38(2):505–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiang WH, Yuan B, Li H, Wang B, Bertozzi A, Carter J, Ray B, Mohler G (2020) SOS-EW: System for overdose spike early warning using drug mover’s distance-based Hawkes processes. Cellier P, Driessens K, eds. Machine Learn. Knowledge Discovery Databases Internat. Workshops ECML PKDD 2019 Proc. Part I (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 538–554.Google Scholar
• Ciccarone D (2017) Fentanyl in the US heroin supply: A rapidly changing risk environment. Internat. J. Drug Policy 46:107–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciccarone D (2021) The rise of illicit fentanyls, stimulants and the fourth wave of the opioid overdose crisis. Current Opinion Psychiatry 34(4):344–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper RL, Thompson J, Edgerton R, Watson J, MacMaster SA, Kalliny M, Huffman MM, et al. (2020) Modeling dynamics of fatal opioid overdose by state and across time. Preventive Medicine Rep. 20:101184.Google Scholar
• Dembek ZF, Chekol T, Wu A (2020) The opioid epidemic: Challenge to military medicine and national security. Military Medicine 185(5–6):e662–e667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Mateu J, Xie Y (2024) Spatio-temporal-network point processes for modeling crime events with landmarks. Preprint, submitted September 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10882.Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Zhu S, Xie Y, Mateu J, Rodríguez-Cortés FJ (2023) Non-stationary spatio-temporal point process modeling for high-resolution COVID-19 data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Statist. 72(2):368–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Embrechts P, Liniger T, Lin L (2011) Multivariate Hawkes processes: An application to financial data. J. Appl. Probab. 48(A):367–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox EW, Short MB, Schoenberg FP, Coronges KD, Bertozzi AL (2016) Modeling e-mail networks and inferring leadership using self-exciting point processes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111(514):564–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Farajtabar M, Dilkina B, Zha H (2018) Discrete interventions in Hawkes processes with applications in invasive species management. Proc. Twenty-Seventh Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 3385–3392.Google Scholar
• Hawkes AG (1971a) Point spectra of some mutually exciting point processes. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Methodological 33(3):438–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawkes AG (1971b) Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58(1):83–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawkes AG (2018) Hawkes processes and their applications to finance: A review. Quant. Finance 18(2):193–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedegaard H, Bastian BA, Trinidad JP, Spencer M, Warner M (2018) Drugs most frequently involved in drug overdose deaths: United States, 2011–2016. Natl. Vital Stat. Rep. 67(9):1–14.Google Scholar
• Hernandez A, Branscum AJ, Li J, MacKinnon NJ, Hincapie AL, Cuadros DF (2020) Epidemiological and geospatial profile of the prescription opioid crisis in Ohio, United States. Sci. Rep. 10(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homer J, Wakeland W (2021) A dynamic model of the opioid drug epidemic with implications for policy. Amer. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 47(1):5–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao TW, Liao CY, Waller LA, Paynabar K (2025) Balancing access, precision, and equity in adaptive test site allocation with an application to COVID-19 in Atlanta, Georgia. Sci. Rep. 15(1):32775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jalali MS, Botticelli M, Hwang RC, Koh HK, McHugh RK (2020) The opioid crisis: A contextual, social-ecological framework. Health Res. Policy Systems 18(1):87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laub PJ, Taimre T, Pollett PK (2015) Hawkes processes. Preprint, submitted July 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02822.Google Scholar
• Liao CY, Bai P, Waller LA, Paynabar K (2025) Estimating hidden epidemic: A Bayesian spatiotemporal compartmental modeling approach. INFORMS J. Data Sci. 4(3):230–247.Link, Google Scholar
• Liao CY, Garcia GGP, DiGennaro C, Jalali MS (2022) Racial disparities in opioid overdose deaths in Massachusetts. JAMA Network Open 5(4):e229081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim TY, Stringfellow EJ, Stafford CA, DiGennaro C, Homer JB, Wakeland W, Eggers SL, et al. (2022) Modeling the evolution of the U.S. opioid crisis for national policy development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(23):e2115714119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linas BP, Savinkina A, Madushani R, Wang J, Yazdi GE, Chatterjee A, Walley AY, et al. (2021) Projected estimates of opioid mortality after community-level interventions. JAMA Network Open 4(2):e2037259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippold KM, Jones CM, Olsen EO, Giroir BP (2019) Racial/ethnic and age group differences in opioid and synthetic opioid–involved overdose deaths among adults aged ≥ 18 years in metropolitan areas—United States, 2015–2017. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep. 68(43):967–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu X, Carter J, Ray B, Mohler G (2021) Point process modeling of drug overdoses with heterogeneous and missing data. Ann. Appl. Statist. 15(1):88–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lum K, Isaac W (2016) To predict and serve? Significance 13(5):14–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mattson CL, Tanz LJ, Quinn K, Kariisa M, Patel P, Davis NL (2021) Trends and geographic patterns in drug and synthetic opioid overdose deaths—United States, 2013–2019. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep. 70(6):202–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer S, Elias J, Höhle M (2012) A space–time conditional intensity model for invasive meningococcal disease occurrence. Biometrics 68(2):607–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miscouridou X, Caron F, Teh YW (2018) Modelling sparsity, heterogeneity, reciprocity and community structure in temporal interaction data. Bengio S, Wallach H, Larochelle H, Grauman K, Cesa-Bianchi N, Garnett R, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 31 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
• Mohler GO, Short MB, Brantingham PJ, Schoenberg FP, Tita GE (2011) Self-exciting point process modeling of crime. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):100–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics (2021) Multiple cause of death 1999-2020 on CDC wonder online database. Data are compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program.Google Scholar
• Ogata Y (1981) On Lewis’ simulation method for point processes. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 27(1):23–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogata Y (1988) Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83(401):9–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page ES (1954) Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41(1/2):100–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Passino FS, Heard NA (2023) Mutually exciting point process graphs for modeling dynamic networks. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. 32(1):116–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Passino FS, Che Y, Perello CCC (2024) Graph-based mutually exciting point processes for modelling event times in docked bike-sharing systems. Stat 13(1):e660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pear VA, Ponicki WR, Gaidus A, Keyes KM, Martins SS, Fink DS, Rivera-Aguirre A, Gruenewald PJ, Cerdá M (2019) Urban-rural variation in the socioeconomic determinants of opioid overdose. Drug Alcohol Dependence 195:66–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitt AL, Humphreys K, Brandeau ML (2018) Modeling health benefits and harms of public policy responses to the us opioid epidemic. Amer. J. Public Health 108(10):1394–1400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinhart A (2018) A review of self-exciting spatio-temporal point processes and their applications. Statist. Sci. 33(3):299–318.Google Scholar
• Reinhart A, Greenhouse J (2018) Self-exciting point processes with spatial covariates: Modelling the dynamics of crime. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Statist. 67(5):1305–1329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholl L, Seth P, Kariisa M, Wilson N, Baldwin G (2019) Drug and opioid-involved overdose deaths—United States, 2013–2017. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep. 67(5152):1419–1427.Google Scholar
• Stringfellow EJ, Lim TY, DiGennaro C, Hasgul Z, Jalali MS (2023) Enumerating contributions of fentanyls and other factors to the unprecedented 2020 rise in opioid overdose deaths: Model-based analysis. PNAS Nexus 2(4):pgad064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stringfellow EJ, Lim TY, Humphreys K, DiGennaro C, Stafford C, Beaulieu E, Homer J, et al. (2022) Reducing opioid use disorder and overdose deaths in the United States: A dynamic modeling analysis. Sci. Adv. 8(25):eabm8147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tatar M, Faraji MR, Keyes K, Wilson FA, Jalali MS (2023) Social vulnerability predictors of drug poisoning mortality: A machine learning analysis in the United States. Amer. J. Addictions 32(6):539–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vadivelu N, Kai AM, Kodumudi V, Sramcik J, Kaye AD (2018) The opioid crisis: A comprehensive overview. Current Pain Headache Rep. 22(3):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkow ND, Blanco C (2021) The changing opioid crisis: Development, challenges and opportunities. Molecular Psychiatry 26(1):218–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walley AY, Xuan Z, Hackman HH, Quinn E, Doe-Simkins M, Sorensen-Alawad A, Ruiz S, Ozonoff A (2013) Opioid overdose rates and implementation of overdose education and nasal naloxone distribution in Massachusetts: Interrupted time series analysis. BMJ 346:f174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu L, Duan JA, Whinston A (2014) Path to purchase: A mutually exciting point process model for online advertising and conversion. Management Sci. 60(6):1392–1412.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang SY, Liu A, Chen J, Hawkes A (2018) Applications of a multivariate Hawkes process to joint modeling of sentiment and market return events. Quant. Finance 18(2):295–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young SD, Zheng K, Chu LF, Humphreys K (2018) Internet searches for opioids predict future emergency department heroin admissions. Drug Alcohol Dependence 190:166–169.Crossref, Google Scholar