Distributionally Robust Monopoly Pricing: Switching from Low to High Prices in Volatile Markets

References

• Afèche P (2013) Incentive-compatible revenue management in queueing systems: Optimal strategic delay. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):423–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Aksin Z, Ata B, Emadi SM, Su CL (2013) Structural estimation of callers’ delay sensitivity in call centers. Management Sci. 59(12):2727–2746.Link, Google Scholar
• Allouah A, Bahamou A, Besbes O (2022) Pricing with samples. Oper. Res. 70(2):1088–1104.Link, Google Scholar
• Ata B, Peng X (2018) An equilibrium analysis of a multiclass queue with endogenous abandonments in heavy traffic. Oper. Res. 66(1):163–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Azar P, Micali S (2012) Optimal parametric auctions. Technical report, MIT-CSAIL-TR-2012-011, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Baron O, Chen X, Li Y (2023) Omnichannel services: The false premise and operational remedies. Management Sci. 69(2):865–884.Link, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Schlag K (2008) Pricing without priors. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(2–3):560–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Schlag K (2011) Robust monopoly pricing. J. Econom. Theory 146(6):2527–2543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Castro F, Weintraub G (2022) Third-degree price discrimination versus uniform pricing. Games Econom. Behav. 131:275–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Feldman P (2011) Pricing services subject to congestion: Charge per-use fees or sell subscriptions? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):244–260.Link, Google Scholar
• Cao P, Wang Y, Xie J (2019) Priority service pricing with heterogeneous customers: Impact of delay cost distribution. Production Oper. Management 28(11):2854–2876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrasco V, Luz VF, Kos N, Messner M, Monteiro P, Moreira H (2018) Optimal selling mechanisms under moment conditions. J. Econom. Theory 177:245–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G (2019) Robustness in mechanism design and contracting. Annual Rev. Econom. 11:139–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Celis LE, Lewis G, Mobius M, Nazerzadeh H (2014) Buy-it-now or take-a-chance: Price discrimination through randomized auctions. Management Sci. 60(12):2927–2948.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Frank M (2004) Monopoly pricing when customers queue. IIE Trans. 36(6):569–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Hu M, Perakis G (2022a) Distribution-free pricing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(4):1939–1958.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen M, Hu M, Wang J (2022b) Food delivery service and restaurant: Friend or foe? Management Sci. 68(9):6539–6551.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Hu Z, Wang R (2024) Screening with limited information: A dual perspective. Oper. Res. 72(4):1487–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Condorelli D, Szentes B (2020) Information design in the holdup problem. J. Political Econom. 128(2):681–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Schepper A, Heijnen B (1995) General restrictions on tail probabilities. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 64(1–2):177–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Schepper A, Heijnen B (2007) Distribution-free option pricing. Insurance Math. Econom. 40(2):179–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Ye Y (2010) Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3):595–612.Link, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Gentzkow M (2019) Uniform pricing in US retail chains. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):2011–2084.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Mendelson H (1990) User delay costs and internal pricing for a service facility. Management Sci. 36(12):1502–1517.Link, Google Scholar
• Elmachtoub AN, Gupta V, Hamilton ML (2021) The value of personalized pricing. Management Sci. 67(10):6055–6070.Link, Google Scholar
• Eren SS, Maglaras C (2010) Monopoly pricing with limited demand information. J. Revenue Pricing Management 9(1):23–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feller W (1971) An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. II (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York).Google Scholar
• Gallego G (1992) A minmax distribution free procedure for the (Q,R) inventory model. Oper. Res. Lett. 11(1):55–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giannakopoulos Y, Poças D, Tsigonias-Dimitriadis A (2023) Robust revenue maximization under minimal statistical information. ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 10(3):1–34.Google Scholar
• Gilland WG, Warsing DP (2009) The impact of revenue-maximizing priority pricing on customer delay costs. Decision Sci. 40(1):89–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha AY (1998) Incentive-compatible pricing for a service facility with joint production and congestion externalities. Management Sci. 44(12):1623–1636.Link, Google Scholar
• Ha AY (2001) Optimal pricing that coordinates queues with customer-chosen service requirements. Management Sci. 47(7):915–930.Link, Google Scholar
• Hassin R, Haviv M (2003) To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haviv M, Randhawa RS (2014) Pricing in queues without demand information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(3):401–411.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson JP, Myatt DP (2006) On the simple economics of advertising, marketing, and product design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):756–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E (2019) Bayesian persuasion and information design. Annual Rev. Econom. 11:249–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E, Gentzkow M (2011) Bayesian persuasion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2590–2615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kos N, Messner M (2015) Selling to the mean. Preprint, submitted July 31, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2632014.Google Scholar
• Loertscher S, Muir EV (2022) Monopoly pricing, optimal randomization, and resale. J. Political Econom. 130(3):566–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Musalem A, Olivares M, Schilkrut A (2013) Measuring the effect of queues on customer purchases. Management Sci. 59(8):1743–1763.Link, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Riley J (1984) Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):171–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morganti P (2025) Non-regular distributions, virtual values and monopoly problems. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paolo-Riccardo-Morganti/publication/394074360_Non_Regular_Distributions_Virtual_Values_and_Monopoly_Problems/data/6887f98c00a2407910a4d717/Manuscript.pdf.Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Naor P (1969) The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica 37(1):15–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natarajan K, Teo CP (2017) On reduced semidefinite programs for second order moment bounds with applications. Math. Programming 161(1):487–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nazerzadeh H, Randhawa RS (2018) Near-optimality of coarse service grades for customer differentiation in queueing systems. Production Oper. Management 27(3):578–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL (2004) Optimal leadtime differentiation via diffusion approximations. Oper. Res. 52(2):213–228.Link, Google Scholar
• Riley J, Zeckhauser R (1983) Optimal selling strategies: When to haggle, when to hold firm. Quart. J. Econom. 98(2):267–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roesler AK, Szentes B (2017) Buyer-optimal learning and monopoly pricing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(7):2072–2080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogosinski WW (1958) Moments of non-negative mass. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A Math. Physical Sci. 245(1240):1–27.Google Scholar
• Roos E, den Hertog D (2021) A distributionally robust analysis of the program evaluation and review technique. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 291(3):918–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roos E, Brekelmans R, van Eekelen W, den Hertog D, van Leeuwaarden JSH (2022) Tight tail probability bounds for distribution-free decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 299(3):931–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roughgarden T, Schrijvers O (2016) Ironing in the dark. Conitzer V, Bergemann D, Chen Y, eds. Proc. 2016 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 1–18.Google Scholar
• Scarf HE (1958) A min-max solution of an inventory problem. Arrow KJ, Karlin S, Scarf HE, eds. Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA), 201–209.Google Scholar
• Schweizer N, Szech N (2019) Performance bounds for optimal sales mechanisms beyond the monotone hazard rate condition. J. Math. Econom. 82:202–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro A (2001) On duality theory of conic linear problems. Goberna MA, López MA, eds. Semi-Infinite Programming: Recent Advances (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 135–165.Google Scholar
• Stidham S (1992) Pricing and capacity decisions for a service facility: Stability and multiple local optima. Management Sci. 38(8):1121–1139.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun M (2012) How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Sci. 58(4):696–707.Link, Google Scholar
• Suzdaltsev A (2018) Distributionally robust pricing in auctions. Preprint, submitted February 17, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3119305.Google Scholar
• Taylor TA (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):704–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Timsina N (2024) Tesla cuts US prices of models Y, X, S by $2000. Reuters Online (April 19), Https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-cuts-us-prices-models-y-x-s-by-2000-2024-04-20/.Google Scholar
• van Eekelen W, den Hertog D, van Leeuwaarden JSH (2022) MAD dispersion measure makes extremal queue analysis simple. INFORMS J. Comput. 34(3):1681–1692.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Liu S, Zhang J (2024) Minimax regret robust screening with moment information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(3):992–1012.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiesemann W, Kuhn D, Sim M (2014) Distributionally robust convex optimization. Oper. Res. 62(6):1358–1376.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson R (1987) Game-theoretic analyses of trading processes. Bewley TF, ed. Advances in Economic Theory: Fifth World Congress (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 33–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu DZ, Zhao X, Sun D (2013) Optimal pricing and capacity investment for delay-sensitive demand. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 60(1):124–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziya S, Ayhan H, Foley RD (2004) Relationships among three assumptions in revenue management. Oper. Res. 52(5):804–809.Link, Google Scholar