How Forced Intervention Facilitates AI Adoption

References

• Acland D, Levy MR (2015) Naiveté, projection bias, and habit formation in gym attendance. Management Sci. 61(1):146–160.Link, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Ayvaci MU, Özer Ö (2023) Value of algorithm-enabled process innovation: The case of sepsis. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(4):1545–1566.Link, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(10):3003–3037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai B, Dai H, Zhang DJ, Zhang F, Hu H (2022) The impacts of algorithmic work assignment on fairness perceptions and productivity: Evidence from field experiments. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(6):3060–3078.Link, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan M, Ferreira KJ, Tong J (2025) Human-algorithm collaboration with private information: Naïve advice-weighting behavior and mitigation. Management Sci. 72(1):265–284.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrera-Osorio F, Bertrand M, Linden LL, Perez-Calle F (2011) Improving the design of conditional transfer programs: Evidence from a randomized education experiment in Colombia. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 3(2):167–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1992) Habits, addictions, and traditions. KYKLOS 45(3):327–345. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J. Political Econom. 96(4):675–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyacı T, Canyakmaz C, de Véricourt F (2023) Human and machine: The impact of machine input on decision making under cognitive limitations. Management Sci. 70(2):1258–1275.Link, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Cai W, Sandino T (2022) Learning or playing? The effect of gamified training on performance. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper, 19–101.Google Scholar
• Caro F, de Tejada Cuenca AS (2023) Believing in analytics: Managers’ adherence to price recommendations from a DSS. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(2):524–542.Link, Google Scholar
• Castelo N, Bos MW, Lehmann DR (2019) Task-dependent algorithm aversion. J. Marketing Res. 56(5):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U (2009) Incentives to exercise. Econometrica 77(3):909–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Li X, Sun C, Wang H (2023) Learning to make adherence-aware advice. Preprint, submitted October 1, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00817.Google Scholar
• Cui R, Li M, Zhang S (2022) AI and procurement. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):691–706.Link, Google Scholar
• Dai T, Singh S (2025) Artificial intelligence on call: The physician’s decision of whether to use AI in clinical practice. J. Marketing Res. 62(5):854–875. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dargnies MP, Hakimov R, Kübler D (2024) Aversion to hiring algorithms: Transparency, gender profiling, and self-confidence. Management Sci. 72(1):285–301.Link, Google Scholar
• de Véricourt F, Gurkan H (2023) Is your machine better than you? You may never know. Management Sci. 72(1):558–574.Link, Google Scholar
• Desmet K, Parente SL (2014) Resistance to technology adoption: The rise and decline of guilds. Rev. Econom. Dynam. 17(3):437–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Bharti S (2020) People reject algorithms in uncertain decision domains because they have diminishing sensitivity to forecasting error. Psych. Sci. 31(10):1302–1314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2015) Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Experiment. Psych. General 144(1):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can even slightly modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.Link, Google Scholar
• Domingos P (2012) A few useful things to know about machine learning. Comm. ACM 55(10):78–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher M, Gallino S, Netessine S (2021) Does online training work in retail? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(4):876–894.Link, Google Scholar
• Giné X, Karlan D, Zinman J (2010) Put your money where your butt is: A commitment contract for smoking cessation. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(4):213–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grand-Clément J, Pauphilet J (2024) The best decisions are not the best advice: Making adherence-aware recommendations. Management Sci. 72(1):667–692.Link, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Henfridsson O, Kaganer E, Kyriakou H (2021) The role of artificial intelligence and data network effects for creating user value. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):534–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunaratne J, Zalmanson L, Nov O (2018) The persuasive power of algorithmic and crowdsourced advice. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(4):1092–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haftor DM, Costa-Climent R (2023) A pathway to bypassing market entry barriers from data network effects: A case study of a startup’s use of machine learning. J. Bus. Res. 168:114244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han BR, Li M, Zhang Y, Li P (2024) Value of autonomous last-mile delivery: Evidence from Alibaba. Preprint, submitted, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4730263.Google Scholar
• Hospedales T, Antoniou A, Micaelli P, Storkey A (2021) Meta-learning in neural networks: A survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 44(9):5149–5169.Google Scholar
• Ibanez MR, Toffel MW (2020) How scheduling can bias quality assessment: Evidence from food-safety inspections. Management Sci. 66(6):2396–2416.Link, Google Scholar
• Ibanez MR, Clark JR, Huckman RS, Staats BR (2018) Discretionary task ordering: Queue management in radiological services. Management Sci. 64(9):4389–4407.Link, Google Scholar
• Ibrahim R, Kim SH, Tong J (2021) Eliciting human judgment for prediction algorithms. Management Sci. 67(4):2314–2325.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang ZZ, Kong G, Zhang Y (2021) Making the most of your regret: Workers’ relocation decisions in on-demand platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):695–713.Link, Google Scholar
• Joseph RC (2010) Individual resistance to IT innovations. Comm. ACM 53(4):144–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlinsky-Shichor Y, Netzer O (2023) Automating the B2B salesperson pricing decisions: A human-machine hybrid approach. Marketing Sci. 43(1):138–157.Link, Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi K (2021) When will workers follow an algorithm? A field experiment with a retail business. Management Sci. 67(3):1670–1695.Link, Google Scholar
• Kesavan S, Kushwaha T (2020) Field experiment on the profit implications of merchants’ discretionary power to override data-driven decision-making tools. Management Sci. 66(11):5182–5190.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirshner SN (2024) Psychological distance and algorithm aversion: Congruency and advisor confidence. Service Sci. 17(2–3):74–91.Link, Google Scholar
• Knight B, Mitrofanov D, Netessine S (2022) The impact of AI technology on the productivity of gig economy workers. Preprint, submitted March 3, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4372368.Google Scholar
• Kwon C, Raman A, Moreno A (2023) The impact of input inaccuracy on leveraging AI tools: Evidence from algorithmic labor scheduling. Preprint, submitted November 20, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4602747.Google Scholar
• Lehmann CA, Haubitz CB, Fügener A, Thonemann UW (2022) The risk of algorithm transparency: How algorithm complexity drives the effects on the use of advice. Production Oper. Management 31(9):3419–3434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Jain D (2023) How network effects make AI smarter. Harvard Bus. Rev. Online (March 14), https://hbr.org/2023/03/how-network-effects-make-ai-smarter. Google Scholar
• Li Y, Lu LX, Lu SF, Chen J (2022) The value of health information technology interoperability: Evidence from interhospital transfer of heart attack patients. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):827–845.Link, Google Scholar
• Liang X, Wang YI, Li J (2024) Examining behavioral biases in discretionary pricing: Evidence from field and lab experiments. Prod. Oper. Manag. 33(6):1335–1353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin W, Kim SH, Tong J (2023) Revisiting the cause of algorithm aversion: Algorithm feedback asymmetry in the field and lab. Preprint, submitted August 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891832.Google Scholar
• Liu S, He L, Max Shen ZJ (2021) On-time last-mile delivery: Order assignment with travel-time predictors. Management Sci. 67(7):4095–4119.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu M, Tang X, Xia S, Zhang S, Zhu Y, Meng Q (2023) Algorithm aversion: Evidence from ridesharing drivers. Management Sci. 72(1):193–203.Link, Google Scholar
• Logg JM, Minson JA, Moore DA (2019) Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 151:90–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Longoni C, Bonezzi A, Morewedge CK (2019) Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. J. Consumer Res. 46(4):629–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Xiong Y (2023) The role of data-based intelligence and experience on time efficiency of taxi drivers: An empirical investigation using large-scale sensor data. Production Oper. Management 32(11):3665–3682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Tong S, Fang Z, Qu Z (2019) Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Sci. 38(6):937–947.Abstract, Google Scholar
• McElheran K, Yang MJ, Kroff Z, Brynjolfsson E (2025) The rise of industrial AI in America: Microfoundations of the productivity J-curve(s). Working paper CES-25-27, Center for Economic Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Minson JA, Volpp KG (2014) Holding the hunger games hostage at the gym: An evaluation of temptation bundling. Management Sci. 60(2):283–299.Link, Google Scholar
• Newman DT, Fast NJ, Harmon DJ (2020) When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 160:149–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.Link, Google Scholar
• Reich T, Kaju A, Maglio SJ (2023) How to overcome algorithm aversion: Learning from mistakes. J. Consumer Psych. 33(2):285–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis L, Maier C, Mattke J, Creutzenberg M, Weitzel T (2020) Addressing user resistance would have prevented a healthcare AI project failure. MIS Quart. Executive 19(4):8.Google Scholar
• Royer H, Stehr M, Sydnor J (2015) Incentives, commitments, and habit formation in exercise: Evidence from a field experiment with workers at a Fortune-500 company. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 7(3):51–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein AI, Popescul A, Ungar LH, Pennock DM (2002) Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. Proc. 25th Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 253–260.Google Scholar
• Schilbach F (2019) Alcohol and self-control: A field experiment in India. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(4):1290–1322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senoner J, Netland T, Feuerriegel S (2022) Using explainable artificial intelligence to improve process quality: Evidence from semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 68(8):5704–5723.Link, Google Scholar
• Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.Link, Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Dai H, Hofmann D, Milkman KL (2017) Motivating process compliance through individual electronic monitoring: An empirical examination of hand hygiene in healthcare. Management Sci. 63(5):1563–1585.Link, Google Scholar
• Stamatopoulos I, Bassamboo A, Moreno A (2021) The effects of menu costs on retail performance: Evidence from adoption of the electronic shelf label technology. Management Sci. 67(1):242–256.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun J, Zhang DJ, Hu H, Van Mieghem JA (2022) Predicting human discretion to adjust algorithmic prescription: A large-scale field experiment in warehouse operations. Management Sci. 68(2):846–865.Link, Google Scholar
• Tan TF, Netessine S (2019) When you work with a superman, will you also fly? An empirical study of the impact of coworkers on performance. Management Sci. 65(8):3495–3517.Link, Google Scholar
• Tong S, Jia N, Luo X, Fang Z (2021) The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1600–1631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turel O, Kalhan S (2023) Prejudiced against the machine? Implicit associations and the transience of algorithm aversion. MIS Quart. 47(4):1369–1394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaccaro M, Almaatouq A, Malone TW (2024) When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Human Behav. 8:2293–2303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Donselaar KH, Gaur V, Van Woensel T, Broekmeulen RA, Fransoo JC (2010) Ordering behavior in retail stores and implications for automated replenishment. Management Sci. 56(5):766–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Volpp KG, Troxel AB, Pauly MV, Glick HA, Puig A, Asch DA, Galvin R, et al. (2009) A randomized, controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation. New England J Medicine 360(7):699–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Choudhary V, Yin S (2023a) Product design enhancement for fashion retailing. Service Sci. 15(3):157–171.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Gao G, Agarwal R (2023b) Friend or foe? Teaming between artificial intelligence and workers with variation in experience. Management Sci. 70(9):5753–5775.Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Dai H, Yan W (2024) Identity disclosure and anthropomorphism in voice chatbot design: A field experiment. Management Sci. 72(1):223–241.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Tan TF, Netessine S (2022) The impact of workload on operational risk: Evidence from a commercial bank. Management Sci. 68(4):2668–2693.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Lu B, Ghose A, Dai H, Zhou W (2023) The interplay of earnings, ratings, and penalties on sharing platforms: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 69(10):6128–6146.Link, Google Scholar
• Ye Z, Zhang DJ, Zhang H, Zhang R, Chen X, Xu Z (2023) Cold start to improve market thickness on online advertising platforms: Data-driven algorithms and field experiments. Management Sci. 69(7):3838–3860.Link, Google Scholar
• You S, Yang CL, Li X (2022) Algorithmic versus human advice: Does presenting prediction performance matter for algorithm appreciation? J. Management Inform. Systems 39(2):336–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zwick T (2002) Employee resistance against innovations. Internat. J. Manpower 23(6):542–552.Crossref, Google Scholar