Startup Contracting and Entrepreneur-Investor Bargaining

References

• Aghion P, Holden R (2011) Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm: What have we learned over the past 25 years? J. Econom. Perspect. 25(2):181–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof R, Holden R (2019) Capital assembly. J. Law Econom. Organ. 35(3):489–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amore MD, Conti A, Pelucco V (2023) Micro venture capital. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 17(4):886–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anbarci N, Feltovich N (2013) How sensitive are bargaining outcomes to changes in disagreement payoffs? Experiment. Econom. 16(4):560–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anbarci N, Feltovich N (2018) How fully do people exploit their bargaining position? The effects of bargaining institution and the 50–50 norm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 145:320–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azrieli Y, Chambers CP, Healy PJ (2018) Incentives in experiments: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. 126(4):1472–1503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Issacharoff S, Camerer CF (1995) Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1337–1343.Google Scholar
• Baranski A (2019) Endogenous claims and collective production: An experimental study on the timing of profit-sharing negotiations and production. Experiment. Econom. 22(4):857–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Ahn HS, Leider S (2018) Can trustworthiness in a supply chain be signaled? Management Sci. 64(9):3974–3994.Link, Google Scholar
• Bengtsson O, Hsu DH (2010) How do venture capital partners match with startup founders? Preprint, submitted March 11, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1568131.Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Dewatripont M (2004) Contract Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Karagözoğlu E (2016) On the influence of hard leverage in a soft leverage bargaining game: The importance of credible claims. Games Econom. Behav. 99:164–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CB Insights (2015) Small giants: The past, present, and future of micro VCs. Accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.cbinsights.com/research/past-present-future-micro-vc/.Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu LY, Rong Y, Zheng H (2020) The strategic benefit of request for proposal/quotation. Oper. Res. 70(3):1410–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Fehder DC, Hochberg YV, Murray F (2019) The design of startup accelerators. Res. Policy 48(7):1781–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contigiani A (2023) Experimentation and appropriability in early-stage ventures: Evidence from the US software industry. Strategic Management J. 44(9):2128–2174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K, Katok E, Sterman J (2014) Order stability in supply chains: Coordination risk and the role of coordination stock. Production Oper. Management 23(2):176–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cubitt R, Starmer C, Sugden R (1998) On the validity of the random lottery incentive scheme. Experiment. Econom. 1(2):115–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Mallucci P (2016) Fairness ideals in distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 53(6):969–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Da Rin M, Hellmann T, Puri M (2013) A survey of venture capital research. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 2 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 573–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalle JM, Den Besten M, Menon C (2017) Using Crunchbase for economic and managerial research. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper No. 2017/08, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
• Davidson C (1988) Multiunit bargaining in oligopolistic industries. J. Labor Econom. 6(3):397–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis A, Hyndman K (2019) Multidimensional bargaining and inventory risk in supply chains: An experimental study. Management Sci. 65(3):1286–1304.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis A, Leider S (2018) Contracts and capacity investment in supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(3):403–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis A, Hyndman K, Qi A, Hu B (2022) Procurement for assembly under asymmetric information: Theory and evidence. Management Sci. 68(4):2694–2713.Link, Google Scholar
• De Bettignies JE (2008) Financing the entrepreneurial venture. Management Sci. 54(1):151–166.Link, Google Scholar
• Embrey M, Hyndman K, Riedl A (2021) Bargaining with a residual claimant: An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. 126:335–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewens M, Gorbenko A, Korteweg A (2022) Venture capital contracts. J. Financial Econom. 143(1):131–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Lu LX (2012) The strategic perils of low cost outsourcing. Management Sci. 58(6):1196–1210.Link, Google Scholar
• Frechette G, Kagel JH, Morelli M (2005a) Gamson’s law versus non-cooperative bargaining theory. Games Econom. Behav. 51(2):365–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frechette G, Kagel JH, Morelli M (2005b) Nominal bargaining power, selection protocol, and discounting in legislative bargaining. J. Public Econom. 89(8):1497–1517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gantner A, Güth W, Königstein M (2001) Equitable choices in bargaining games with joint production. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 46(2):209–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gornall W, Strebulaev IA (2020) Squaring venture capital valuations with reality. J. Financial Econom. 135(1):120–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halac M, Kremer I, Winter E (2020) Raising capital from heterogeneous investors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(3):889–921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellmann T (2006) IPOs, acquisitions, and the use of convertible securities in venture capital. J. Financial Econom. 81(3):649–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellmann T, Wasserman N (2017) The first deal: The division of founder equity in new ventures. Management Sci. 63(8):2647–2666.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Su X (2009) Peer-induced fairness in games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):2022–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Zhang J (2008) Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. 54(4):686–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Su X, Wu Y (2014) Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design. Production Oper. Management 23(2):161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horn H, Wolinsky A (1988) Bilateral monopolies and incentives for merger. RAND J. Econom. 19(3):408–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hossain T, Lyons E, Siow A (2020) Fairness considerations in joint venture formation. Experiment. Econom. 23(3):632–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isoni A, Sugden R, Zheng J (2022) Focal points in experimental bargaining games. Karagözoğlu E, Hyndman K, eds. Bargaining: Current Research and Future Directions (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland), 109–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagan E, Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2020) Equity contracts and incentive design in start-up teams. Management Sci. 66(10):4879–4898.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalkancı B, Chen KY, Erhun F (2011) Contract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information: An experimental evaluation. Management Sci. 57(4):689–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalkancı B, Chen KY, Erhun F (2014) Complexity as a contract design factor: A human-to-human experimental study. Production Oper. Management 23(2):269–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Lerner J (2016) Venture capital data: Opportunities and challenges. Measuring Entrepreneurial Businesses: Current Knowledge and Challenges (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 413–431.Google Scholar
• Karagözoğlu E, Keskin K (2018) Endogenous reference points in bargaining. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 88(2):283–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Pavlov V (2013) Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study. J. Oper. Management 31(3):129–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kavadias S, Hutchison-Krupat J (2020) A framework for managing innovation. Pushing the Boundaries: Frontiers in Impactful OR/OM Research, INFORMS TutORials in Operations Research (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 202–228.Link, Google Scholar
• Kavadias S, Ulrich KT (2020) Innovation and new product development: Reflections and insights from the research published in the first 20 years of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):84–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Nanda R (2015) Financing innovation. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 7(1):445–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Ulrich KT (2001) Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. 47(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2016) Bargaining in supply chains. Management Sci. 62(10):3039–3058.Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Nanda R (2020) Venture capital’s role in financing innovation: What we know and how much we still need to learn. J. Econom. Perspect. 34(3):237–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Leider S, Beil D, Duenyas I (2021) Running online experiments using web-conferencing software. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 7(2):167–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim N, Ho TH (2007) Designing price contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the number of blocks matter? Marketing Sci. 26(3):312–326.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy WS (2010) Bargaining chains. Management Sci. 56(12):2282–2301.Link, Google Scholar
• Moritz BB, Narayanan A, Parker C (2022) Unraveling behavioral ordering: Relative costs and the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(3):1733–1750.Link, Google Scholar
• Murnighan JK, Roth AE, Schoumaker F (1988) Risk aversion in bargaining: An experimental study. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):101–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Venture Capital Association (2024) Q4-2023 NVCA pitchbook venture monitor. Technical report, National Venture Capital Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Nydegger RV, Owen G (1974) Two-person bargaining: An experimental test of the Nash axioms. Internat. J. Game Theory 3(4):239–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen KY (2011) Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. 57(6):1111–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Ren Y (2014) Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the United States. Management Sci. 60(10):2435–2460.Link, Google Scholar
• PitchBook Data, Inc (2023) Party rounds fall out of favor with VC downturn. Technical report, PitchBook Data, Inc., Seattle.Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Lara I (2016) Equity and bargaining power in ultimatum games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 130:144–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1995) Bargaining experiments. Kagel J, Roth AE, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 253–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Rothblum U (1982) Risk aversion and Nash’s solution for bargaining games with risky outcomes. Econometrica 50(3):639–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt KM (2003) Convertible securities and venture capital finance. J. Finance 58(3):1139–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalev J (2002) Loss aversion and bargaining. Theory Decision 52(3):201–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.Link, Google Scholar
• Walker P, Dowd K (2024) State of private markets: Q1 2024. Technical report. Carta, San Francisco.Google Scholar
• Y Combinator (2023) Series A term sheet. Accessed November 10, 2023, https://www.ycombinator.com/series_a_term_sheet.Google Scholar
• Yürükoğlu A (2022) Empirical models of bargaining with externalities in IO and trade. Karagözoğlu E, Hyndman K, eds. Bargaining: Current Research and Future Directions (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland), 227–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Donohue K, Cui TH (2016) Contract preferences and performance for the loss-averse supplier: Buyback vs. revenue sharing. Management Sci. 62(6):1734–1754.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao S, López Vargas K, Gutierrez M, Friedman D (2020) UCSC LEEPS lab protocol for online economics experiments. Preprint, submitted June 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3594027.Google Scholar