On Repeat: Does Iteration Drive Innovation?

References

• Allon G, Askalidis G, Berry R, Immorlica N, Moon K, Singh A (2021) When to be agile: Ratings and version updates in mobile apps. Management Sci. 68(6):4261–4278.Link, Google Scholar
• Ansburg PI, Hill K (2003) Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality Individual Differences 34(7):1141–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Schmidt J, Stieglitz N (2019) Effective search in rugged performance landscapes: A review and outlook. J. Management 45(1):285–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E, Swink M, Simpson Iii WP (2014) Prioritizing and monitoring concurrent project work: Effects on switching behavior. Production Oper. Management 23(5):847–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billinger S, Stieglitz N, Schumacher TR (2014) Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organ. Sci. 25(1):93–108.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cirillo F (2018) The Pomodoro Technique: The Acclaimed Time-Management System That Has Transformed How We Work (Currency, New York).Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M (2013) Flow: The Psychology of Happiness (Penguin Random House, London).Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.Link, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2016) Incentives for creativity. Experiment. Econom. 19(2):269–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eyal N (2014) Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Wu A (2023) Iterative coordination and innovation: Prioritizing value over novelty. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2182–2206.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (2002) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Guilford J (1950) Creativity. Amer. Psych. 5(9):444–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hélie S, Sun R (2010) Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psych. Rev. 117(3):994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibanez MR, Clark JR, Huckman RS, Staats BR (2018) Discretionary task ordering: Queue management in radiological services. Management Sci. 64(9):4389–4407.Link, Google Scholar
• Kachelmeier SJ, Reichert BE, Williamson MG (2008) Measuring and motivating quantity, creativity, or both. J. Accounting Res. 46(2):341–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagan E, Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2018) Ideation–execution transition in product development: An experimental analysis. Management Sci. 64(5):2238–2262.Link, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Siemsen E (2011) Why genius leads to adversity: Experimental evidence on the reputational effects of task difficulty choices. Management Sci. 57(6):1042–1054.Link, Google Scholar
• Kavadias S, Ulrich KT (2020) Innovation and new product development: Reflections and insights from the research published in the first 20 years of manufacturing & service operations management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):84–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Kc DS (2014) Does multitasking improve performance? Evidence from the emergency department. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(2):168–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Kc DS, Terwiesch C (2011) The effects of focus on performance: Evidence from California hospitals. Management Sci. 57(11):1897–1912.Link, Google Scholar
• Kc DS, Staats BR, Kouchaki M, Gino F (2020) Task selection and workload: A focus on completing easy tasks hurts performance. Management Sci. 66(10):4397–4416.Link, Google Scholar
• Kettunen J, Lejeune MA (2020) Waterfall and agile product development approaches: Disjunctive stochastic programming formulations. Oper. Res. 68(5):1356–1363.Link, Google Scholar
• Kiesel A, Steinhauser M, Wendt M, Falkenstein M, Jost K, Philipp AM, Koch I (2010) Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psych. Bull. 136(5):849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kızılyıldırım R, Korpeoglu CG, Körpeoglu E, Kremer M (2024) An experimental analysis of participation restriction and visibility in parallel innovation contests. Preprint, submitted September 11, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4256134.Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Korpeoglu CG, Hafalır İE (2022) Parallel innovation contests. Oper. Res. 70(3):1506–1530.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Ulrich KT (2001) Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. 47(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Leroy S (2009) Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 109(2):168–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leroy S, Schmidt AM, Madjar N (2020) Interruptions and task transitions: Understanding their characteristics, processes, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):661–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberum T, Schiffels S, Kolisch R (2022) Should we all work in sprints? How agile project management improves performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(4):2293–2309.Link, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Terwiesch C (1999) Accelerating the process of engineering change orders: Capacity and congestion effects. J. Production Innovative Management 16(2):145–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long X, Nasiry J, Wu Y (2020) A behavioral study on abandonment decisions in multistage projects. Management Sci. 66(5):1999–2016.Link, Google Scholar
• Lu JG, Akinola M, Mason MF (2017) Switching on creativity: Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 139:63–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lurie NH, Swaminathan JM (2009) Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):315–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mednick SA (1968) Remote associates test. J. Creative Behav. 2(3):213–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn GA, Griswold BB (1964) Differential use of incidental stimuli in problem solving as a function of creativity. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 68(4):431–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Loch C, Huchzermeier A (2003) Problem–solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. 49(6):733–750.Link, Google Scholar
• Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cognition Sci. 7(3):134–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Balasubramanian S, Swaminathan JM (2009) A matter of balance: Specialization, task variety, and individual learning in a software maintenance environment. Management Sci. 55(11):1861–1876.Link, Google Scholar
• Newport C (2016) Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World (Hachette).Google Scholar
• Rigby DK, Sutherland J, Takeuchi H (2016) Embracing agile: How to master the process that’s transforming management. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94(5):40–50.Google Scholar
• Ritter SM, Dijksterhuis A (2014) Creativity—The unconscious foundations of the incubation period. Frontiers Human Neurosci. 8:73722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roels G, Staats BR (2021) Om forum—People-centric operations: Achievements and future research directions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(4):745–757.Link, Google Scholar
• Sawyer RK (2011) Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Siemsen E (2008) The hidden perils of career concerns in R&D organizations. Management Sci. 54(5):863–877.Link, Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (2000) Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. Amer. Psych. 55(1):151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sommer SC, Loch CH (2004) Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Sci. 50(10):1334–1347.Link, Google Scholar
• Sommer SC, Bendoly E, Kavadias S (2020) How do you search for the best alternative? Experimental evidence on search strategies to solve complex problems. Management Sci. 66(3):1395–1420.Link, Google Scholar
• Sørensen F, Mattsson J, Sundbo J (2010) Experimental methods in innovation research. Res. Policy 39(3):313–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Gino F (2012) Specialization and variety in repetitive tasks: Evidence from a Japanese bank. Management Sci. 58(6):1141–1159.Link, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Loch CH (1999) Managing the process of engineering change orders: The case of the climate control system in automobile development. J. Production Innovative Management 16(2):160–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Torrance EP (1966) The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (Personnel Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Vandierendonck A, Liefooghe B, Verbruggen F (2010) Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psych. Bull. 136(4):601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo OS, Corbett CJ, Roels G (2016) Optimal time allocation for process improvement for growth-focused entrepreneurs. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(3):361–375.Link, Google Scholar