Coordination and Flexibility in Supply Contracts with Options

References

• Barnes-Schuster D., Bassok Y., Anupindi R. Supply contracts with options: Flexibility, information, and coordination. (2002) . Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Bassok Y., Anupindi R. Analysis of supply contracts with commitments and flexibility. (2002) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
• Bassok Y., Srinivasan R., Bixby A., Wiesel H. Design of component supply contracts with commitment revision flexibility. IBM J. Res. Development (1997) 41(6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown A., Hau O., Lee L. Optimal pay-to-delay capacity reservation with application to the semiconductor industry. (1997) . Working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Cachon G., Larieviere Martin. Contracting to assure supply or what did the supplier know and when did he know it? (1997) (The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC) Google Scholar
• Chang C. Semiconductor contract manufacturing. (1996) . Report #SCMS-WW-FR-9601, Dataquest Corporation, Stamford, CTGoogle Scholar
• Donohue K. Supply contracts and fashion goods: Optimizing channel profit. (1996) (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
• Eppen G., Iyer Ananth. Backup agreements in fashion buying—The value of upstream flexibility. Management Sci. (1997) 43(11):1469–1484Link, Google Scholar
• Ernst R., Cohen Morris. Analysis of coordinated alternatives in an manufacturer/dealer inventory system under stochastic demand. Production and Oper. Management J. (1992) 1(3):254–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farlow D., Schmidt G., Tsay A. Supplier management at Sun Microsystems. (1995) (Case study, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Federgruen A., Zipkin P. An inventory model with limited production capacity and uncertain demands II: Discounted cost criterion. Math. Oper. Res. (1986) 11(2):208–215Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher M. L. What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(March-April):105–116Google Scholar
• Fisher M. L., Raman A. Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(1):87–89Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher M. L., Hammond Janine H., Obermeyer Walter R., Raman Ananth. Making supply and demand meet in an uncertain world. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1994) 83–93Google Scholar
• Frazier R. QR inventory replenishment. Proc. 75th NRMA Conf. (1986) (Washington, D.C.)Google Scholar
• Hammond J. H. Quick response in the apparel industry. (1990) . Note #9-60-038, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Hammond J. H. Coordination as the basis for quick response: A case of “virtual” integration in supply networks. (1992) . Working paper #92-007, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Hunter N., King R. E., Nuttle H. L. W. Evaluation of traditional and quick response retailing procedures using stochastic simulation mode. J. Textile Institute (1996) 87(1, part 2):42–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer A., Bergen Mark. Quick response in manufacturer retailer channels. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4Link, Google Scholar
• King R., Hunter N.A. The impact of size distribution forecast errors on retail performance. (1996) . NCSU-IE Technical report #95-8, Industrial Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
• Kouvelis P., Gutierrez G. The newsvendor problem in a global market: Optimal centralized and decentralized control policies for a two-market stochastic inventory systems. Management Sci. (1997) 43(5):571–585Link, Google Scholar
• Kravetz S. Mattel revamps retail strategy to boost sales, find new avenues. Wall Street J. (1999) February 18Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., Whang Seunjin. Decentralized muti-echelon supply chains: Incentives and information. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):633–640Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy J. Personal communication. (1999) Google Scholar
• Moses M., Seshadri Sridhar. Policy mechanisms for supply chain coordination. IIE Trans. Oper. Engrg. (2000) 32(3):245–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan V., Raman Ananth. Contracting for inventory in a distribution channel with stochastic demand and substitute products. (1997) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Nuttle H., Hunter N.A., King R.E. A stochastic model of the apparel retailing process for seasonal apparel. J. Textile Institute (1991) 82(2):247–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan V., Png I.P.L. Return policies: Make money by making good. Sloan Management Rev. (1995) Fall37:65–72Google Scholar
• Pasternack B. A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):166–176Link, Google Scholar
• Pinnow A., King R.E. Break-even cost for traditional versus quick response apparel suppliers. (1997) . NCSU-IE Technical report #97-4, Industrial Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1990) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Tsay A. The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10Link, Google Scholar
• Tsay A., Lovejoy William. Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance. J. Manufacturing and Service Oper. Management (1999) 1(2Google Scholar
• Whalen C. Quick response in action and beyond. Bobin (1993) 34(7):96–99Google Scholar