On the Interface Between Operations and Human Resources Management

References

  • Anand K. N. Four-step approach for eliminating people dominant effect. Total Quality Management (1999) 10(6):829–842CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Appelbaum E., Batt R.High-Performance Work Systems: American Models of Workplace Transformation (1993) (Economic Policy Institute, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):140–154LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey D. E. Comparison of manufacturing performance of three team structures in semiconductor plants. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1998) 45(1):20–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R., Field J., Sinha K. Work-team implementation and trajectories of manufacturing quality: A longitudinal study. Manufacturing Services Oper. Management (2001) 3(1):25–42LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R., Field J., Schroeder R., Sinha K. Impact of work teams on manufacturing performance: A longitudinal study. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):867–890CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartholdi J. D. A production line that balances itself. Oper. Res. (1996a) 44(1):21–34LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bartholdi J. D. Bucket brigades: A self-balancing order-picking system for a warehouse. (1996b) . Working paper, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  • Batt R. Work organization, technology, and performance in customer service and sales. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1999) 52(4):539–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batt R., Osterman P.A National Policy for Workplace Training: Lessons from State and Local Experiments (1993) (Economic Policy Institute, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
  • Becker B., Gerhart B. The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):779–801CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhatnager V., Drury C. G., Schiro S. G. Posture postural discomfort and performance. Human Factors (1985) 27(2):189–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bischak D. Performance of a manufacturing module with moving workers. IIE Trans. (1996) 28(9):723–733CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bishop J., Kang S.Do Some Employers Share the Costs and Benefits of General Training (1996) (Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Bobko P. Derivation and implications of a meta-analytic matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance. Personnel Psych (1999) 52(3):561–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boswell W. R. Employee alignment and the role of “line of sight”. HR: Human Resource Planning (2000) 23(4):48–49Google Scholar
  • Boudreau J. W., Jackson S. E., Hitt M., DeNisi A. S. Strategic knowledge measurement and management. Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage (2003) (Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Boudreau J. W. From “professional business partner” to “strategic talent leader”: “What's next” for human resource management. (2002) . Working paper 02-10, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau J. W., Borman W., Ilgen D., Klimoski R. Strategic I/O psychology and the role of utility analysis models. Handbook of Psychology (2003) 12:193–221Industrial and organizational psychology, Ch. 9. Wiley, New YorkCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau J. W., Dunford B. B., Ramstad P., Pal N., Ray J. M. The human capital "impact" on e-business: The case of Encyclopedia Britannica. Pushing the Digital Frontier: Insights into the Changing Landscape of e-Business (2001) (AMACOM, New York) Google Scholar
  • Boudreau J. W., Sturman M., Trevor C., Gerhart B. Is it worth it to win the talent war? Using turnover research to evaluate the utility of performance-based pay. (1999) . Working paper #99-06, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Bowen D., Gilliland S., Folger R. HRM and service fairness: How being fair with employees spills over to customers. Organ. Dynamics (1999) 27(3):7–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brannick M. T., Salas E., Prince C.Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications (1997) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buzacott J. The impact of worker differences on production system output. Internat. J., Production Econom. (2002) 78(1):37–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell J. P., Ilgen D. R., Pulakos E. D. The definition and measurement of performance in the new age. The Changing Nature of Performance (1999) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 399–430Google Scholar
  • Campbell J. P., Pritchard R. D., Dunnette M. D. Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1976) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Cascio W. F.Costing Human Resources (2000) 4th ed.(Southwestern, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Chadwick C., Capelli P., Wright P. M., Dyer L. D., Boudreau J. W., Milkovich G. T. Alternatives to generic strategy typologies in strategic human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (1999) (JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT) 1–29Supplement 4Google Scholar
  • Clark D. Inside Intel it's all copying—In setting up plants, chip maker clones older ones down to the paint on the wall. Wall Street J. (2002) Oct. 28):B1Google Scholar
  • Conway R., Maxwell W., McClain J., Thomas L. J. The role of work-in-process inventory in serial production lines. Oper. Res. (1988) 36(1):229–241LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cook L. S., Bowen D. E., Chase R. B., Dasu S., Stewart D. M., Tansik D. A. Human issues in service design. J. Oper. Management (2002) 20:159–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings L., Schwab D.Performance in Organizations: Determinants and Appraisal (1973) (Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL) Google Scholar
  • Dachler H. P., Mobley W. H. Construct validation of an instrumentality-expectancy-task-goal model of work motivation. J. Appl. Psych. (1973) 58:397–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daniel S. J., Reitsperger W. D. Linking quality strategy with management control systems: Empirical evidence from Japanese industry. Accounting Organ. Soc. (1991) 16(7):601–619CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeCorte W. A analytic procedure to estimate the benefits of a particular type of personnel classification decision. Education Psych. Measurement (1998a) 58(6):929–943CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeCorte W. Estimating and maximizing the utility of sequential selection decisions with a probationary period. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. (1998b) 51:101–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeFeo J. A. Creating strategic change more efficiently with a new design for six sigma process. J. Change Management (2002) 3(1):60–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doerr K. H., Mitchell T. R., Klastorin T. D., Brown K. A. Impact of material flow policies and goals on job outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81(2):142–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donkin R.Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Evolution of Work (2001) (Texere, New York) 151Google Scholar
  • Dyer L., Shafer R. A., Wright P. M., Dyer L. D., Boudreau J. W., Milkovich G. T. From human resource strategy to organizational effectiveness: Lessons from research on organizational agility. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (1999) (JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT) 145–174Supplement 4Google Scholar
  • Edie L. Traffic delays at toll booths. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Amer. (1954) 2(2):107–137LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Flaherty J. Suggestions rise from the floors of U.S. factories. New York Times (2001) April 18):C.1Google Scholar
  • Garvin D. A. Quality problems, policies and attitudes in the United States and Japan: An exploratory study. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(4):653–673CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbreth F. B.Bricklaying Systems (1909) (Myron Clark, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gilbreth L. M.The Psychology of Management: The Function of the Mind in Determining, Teaching and Installing Methods of Least Waste (1921) (Sturgis and Walton Company, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gill B. Cross training can be a win-win plan. Amer. Printer (1997) 220(1):88Google Scholar
  • Goldratt E. M., Cox J.The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (1984) (North River Press, Croton-on-Hudson, NY) Google Scholar
  • Goldstein I. L.Training in Organizations: Needs Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (2002) (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
  • Guilford D. Giving the general new orders: Can a company that acted like an army get a new attitude? GM is trying. Automotive News (2001) . Sept. 3Google Scholar
  • Guilford D. Storm before the calm: How GM got its wish after riling the UAW with plans for a new way of manufacturing. Automotive News (2002) Jan. 21Google Scholar
  • Guzzo R. A., Salas E.Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (1995) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hackman J. R.Leading Teams Setting Stage (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hackman J. R., Pearce J. L., Wolfe J. C. Effect of changes in job characteristics on work attitudes and behaviors: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1978) 21:289–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hales C. Critical factors in design. Mechanical Engrg. (2001) 123(3):2–5Google Scholar
  • Hartman S. J., Yrle A. C., Gail W. P. Equity in a university setting: Examining procedural and distributive justice. Internat. J., Management (1998) 15(1):3–13Google Scholar
  • Hillier F. S., Boling R. N. Finite queues in series with exponential or Erlang service times: A numerical approach. Oper. Res. (1967) 15:286–303LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard A., Howard A. A framework for work change. The Changing Nature of Work (1995) (Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco, CA) 3–44Google Scholar
  • Hunter J. E., Schmidt F. L., Judiesch M. K. Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75(1):28–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huselid M. A. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(3):635–672CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C., Shaw K. The effects of human resource management systems on economic performance: An international comparison of U.S. and Japanese plants. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):704–721LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(3):291–313Google Scholar
  • Ilgen D. R., Pulakos D. E., Ilgen D. R., Pulakos E. D. Introduction: Employee performance in today's organizations. The Changing Nature of Performance (1999) (Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco, CA) 1–20Google Scholar
  • Iravani S., Sims K., Van Oyen M. Structural flexibility: A new perspective on the design of manufacturing and service operations. (2002) . Working paper, School of Business Administration, Loyola University, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Katzell R. A., Austin J. T. From then to now: The development of industrial-organizational psychology in the United States. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77(6):803–835CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight D., Curham C., Locke E. A. The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):326–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler E. E. Employee involvement makes a difference. J. Quality Participation (1999) 22(5):18–20Google Scholar
  • Levering R., Moskowitz M. The 100 best companies to work for. Fortune (2002) 145(3):72–74Google Scholar
  • Locke E. A. Relation of goal level to performance with a short work period and multiple goal levels. J. Appl. Psych. (1982) 67(4):512–514CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke E. A., Latham G. P.Goal Setting: A Motivational Technique that Works! (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Longenecker C., Scazzero J. A., Stansfield T. C. Quality improvement through team goal setting, feedback, and problem solving: A field experiment. Internat. J., Quality Reliability Management (1994) 7(3):45–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Longenecker C., Stansfield T. C., Dwyer D. The human side of manufacturing improvement. Bus. Horizons (1997) 40(2):7–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luthans F., Davis T., Bowen D. E., Chase R. B., Cummings T. G. Applying behavioral management techniques in service operations. Service Management Effectiveness: Balancing Strategy, Organization and Human Resources, Operations and Marketing (1990) 177–209Google Scholar
  • Maier N. R. F.Psychology in Industry (1955) (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Matlack C., Holmes S. Look out, Boeing. Bus. Week (2002) 50–51Google Scholar
  • McClain J., Schultz K., Thomas L. J. Management of work-sharing systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(1):49–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McFarling L. H., Heimstra N. W. Pacing, product complexity and task perception in simulated inspection. Human Factors (1975) 17(4):361–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGregor D.The Human Side of Enterprise (1960) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • McMahan G. C., Virick M., Wright P. M., Wright P. M., Dyer L. D., Boudreau J. W., Milkovich G. T. Alternative theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management revisited: Progress, problems and prospects. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (1999) (JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT) 99–122Supplement 4Google Scholar
  • Milkovich G. T., Newman J. M.Compensation (2002) (McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Mishina K.Toyota Motor Manufacturing, U.S.A., Inc. (1992) (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA) . Harvard Business School Case 9-693-019Google Scholar
  • Moore S. D. Volvo planning 2 plant closings at Swedish sites. Wall Street J. (1992) Nov. 5):A8Google Scholar
  • Morrow C. C., Jarrett M. Q., Rupinski M. T. An investigation of the effect and economic utility of corporate-wide training. Personnel Psych. (1997) 50(1):91–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noe R. A.Employee Training and Development (2002) (Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ohno T.Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production (1988) (Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ostolaza J. M., McClain J. O., Thomas L. J. The use of dynamic (state-dependent) assembly-line balancing to improve throughput. J. Manufacturing Oper. Management (1990) 3(2):105–133Google Scholar
  • Prokesch S. Edges fray on Volvo's brave new humanistic world. New York Times Current Events Edition (1991) 35(July 7). Sec. 3, p. 5Google Scholar
  • Rehder R. Sayonara, Uddevalla? Bus. Horizons (1992) 35(6):8–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reis P. S., Fahrenbruch S. I. Quality training and awareness aids to defect prevention. Training Development J. (1968) 68(22):28–35Google Scholar
  • Rousseau D. R., Schalk R.Psychological Contracts in Employment: Cross-National Perspectives (2000) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Rucci A. J., Kirn S. P., Quinn R. T. The employee-customer profit chain at Sears. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 83–97(Jan.-Feb.)Google Scholar
  • Salem M., Lazarus H., Cullen J. Developing self-managing teams: Structure and performance. J. Management Development (1992) 11(3):24–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandberg A. Volvo human-centred work organization—The end of the road? New Tech., Work, Employment (1993) 8(2):83–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt V. Incremental validity of situational judgment tests. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(3):410–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider B., Ashworth S. D., Higgs A. C., Carr L. Design, validity and use of strategically focused employee attitude surveys. Personnel Psych. (1996) 49:695–705CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz K., McClain J. O., Thomas L. J. Overcoming the dark side of worker flexibility. J. Oper. Management (2003) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz K., Juran D., Boudreau J., McClain J., Thomas L. J. Modeling and worker motivation in JIT production systems. Management Sci. (1998) 44:1595–1607(12, Part 1)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shammas-Toma M., Seymour D. E., Clark L. The effectiveness of formal quality management systems in achieving the required cover in reinforced concrete. Construction Management Econom. (1996) 14:353–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siekman P. Jeep builds a new kind of plant. Fortune (2002) 446:168B–168L(Nov. 11)Google Scholar
  • Sox C., McClain J. O., Thomas L. J. On-the-fly line balancing with very little WIP. Internat. J., Production Econom. (1992) 27:283–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spear S. Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 96Sept.–Oct.Google Scholar
  • Spearman M. L. Customer service in pull production systems. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(5):948–958LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spearman M. L., Zazanis M. A. Push and pull production systems: Issues and comparisons. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(3):521–532LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spearman M. L., Woodruff D. L., Hopp W. J. CONWIP: A pull alternative to Kanban. Internat. J., Production Res. (1990) 28(5):879–894CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spector P. E.Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Research and Practice (2000) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Stansfield T. E. Feedback and goal setting to improve manufacturing. Internat. Eur. Oper. Management Conf. (1998) Dublin, Ireland(JuneGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart D. M., Chase R. B. The impact of human error on delivering service quality. Production Oper. Management (1999) 8(3):240–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strecker I. Striving toward perfection. Offshore (1996) 56(6Google Scholar
  • Suri R.Quick Response Manufacturing (1998) (Productivity Press, Portland, OR) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suri R. Quick response manufacturing: A competitive strategy for the 21st century. Proc. 2001 Conf. Quick Response Manufacturing (2001) (Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI) . JuneGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Fullerton G., Swartz T., Iacobucci D. Waiting for service: Perceptions management of the wait experience. Handbook of Services Marketing and Management (2000) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) . Chapter 10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terpstra D. E., Rozell E. J. The relationship of staffing practices to organizational level measures of performance. Personnel Psych. (1993) 46(1):27–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas L. J., McClain J. O., Graves S. C., Rinnooy Kan A. H. G., Zipkin P. H. An overview of production planning. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 4, Logistics of Production and Inventory Management (1993) (North-Holland, Amsterdam)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich D.Human Resource Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Van Oyen M. P., Senturk-Gel E. G., Hopp W. J. Performance opportunity of workforce agility in collaborative and noncollaborative work systems. IIE Trans. (2001) 33:761–777CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vroom V.Work and Motivation (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williges R. C., Streeter H. Display characteristics in inspection tasks. J. Appl. Psych. (1971) 55(2):123–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright P., Dyer L., Boudreau J., Milkovich G. Strategic human resources management in the twenty-first century. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (1999) (JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT) 75–98Supplement 4Google Scholar
  • Zavadlav E., McClain J., Thomas L. J. Self-buffering, self-balancing, self-flushing production lines. Management Sci. (1996) 42(8):1151–1164LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zohar E., Mandelbaum A., Shimkin N. Adaptive behavior of impatient customers in tele-queues: Theory and empirical support. Management Sci. (2002) 48(4):599–583LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.