Interactive Multicriteria Optimization for Multiple-Response Product and Process Design

References

  • Askin R. A., Goldberg J. B. Economic optimization in product design. Engrg. Optim. (1988) 14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barton R. S., Tsui K. L. Multivariate yield maximization using CAD/CAE models: Efficient approximations based on mean and variance. Design Theory Methodology, ASME (1991) 31:31–35Google Scholar
  • Brayton R. K., Hachtel G. D., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A. L. A survey of optimization techniques for integrated-circuit design. Proc. IEEE (1981) 69(10):1334–1362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DelCastillo E., Montgomery D. C. A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. J. Quality Tech. (1993) 25(3):199–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DelCastillo E., Montgomery D. C., McCarville D. R. Modified desirability functions for multiple response optimization. J. Quality Tech. (1996) 28(3):337–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derringer G., Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J. Quality Tech. (1980) 12(4):214–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Director S. W., Hachtel G. D. The simplicial approach to design centering. IEEE Trans. Circuits Systems (1977) CAS-24(7):363–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsayed E. A., Chen A. Optimal levels of process parameters for products with multiple characteristics. Internat. J., Production Res. (1993) 31(5):1117–1132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M., Dyer J. S., Feinberg A. An interactive approach for multicriterion optimization with an application to the operation of an academic department. Management Sci. (1972) 19(4):357–368LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harrington E. C. The desirability function. Indust. Quality Control (1965) 21(10):494–498Google Scholar
  • Hunter J. S. Statistical design applied to product design. J. Quality Tech (1985) 17(4):210–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacker R. N. Off-line quality control and the Taguchi method. J. Quality Tech. (1985) 17(4):176–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kananen I., Korhonen P., Wallenius H., Wallenius J. Multiple objective analysis of input-output models for emergency management. Oper. Res. (1990) 38(2):193–201LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karpak B., Kumcu E., Kasuganti R. An application of visual interactive goal programming in vendor selection decisions: A case study. J. Multicriteria Decision Anal. (1999) 8(2):93–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khuri A., Conlon M. Simultaneous optimization of multiple responses represented by polynomial regression functions. Technometrics (1981) 23:363–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim K. J., Lin D. K. J. Dual response surface optimization: A fuzzy modeling approach. J. Quality Tech. (1998) 30:1–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim K. J., Lin D. K. J. Simultaneous optimizations of mechanical properties of steel by maximizing exponential desirability functions. Appl. Statist. (2000) 49:311–325Google Scholar
  • Koksalan M. M., Sagala P. N. S. Interactive approaches for discrete alternative multiple criteria decision making with monotone utility functions. Management Sci. (1995) 41(7):1158–1171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Laakso J. A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Eur. J., Oper. Res. (1986) 24(2):277–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Wallenius J. A Pareto race. Naval Res. Logist. (1988) 35:615–623CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Wallenius J., Lewandowski A., Stanchev I. Observations regarding choice behavior in interactive multiple criteria decision-making environments: An experimental investigation. Methodology and Software in Interactive Decision Support (1989) (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany) 163–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Yu G.-Y. A reference direction approach to multiple objective quadratic-linear programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 102:277–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Wallenius J., Zionts S. Solving the discrete multiple criteria problem using convex cones. Management Sci. (1984) 30:1336–1345LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leon R. B., Shoemaker A. C., Kacker R. N. Performance measures independent of adjustment. Technometrics (1987) 29(3):253–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu W., Batill S. M. Gradient-enhanced response surface approximations using Kriging models. 9th AIAA/ISSMO Sympos. Multidisciplinary Analysis Optim. (2002) (Atlanta, GA). September 4–6CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miettinen K.Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Miller G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. (1956) 63(2):81–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers R. H., Montgomery D. C.Response Surface Methodology (1995) (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Neter J., Wassermann W., Kutner M. H.Applied Linear Statistical Models (1990) (Richard D. Irwin, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pignatiello J. J. Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering. IIE Trans. (1993) 25(3):5–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plante R. D. Multicriteria models for the allocation of design parameter targets. Eur. J., Oper. Res. (1999) 115(1):98–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plante R. D. Process capability: A criterion for optimizing multiple response product and process design. IIE Trans. (2001) 33(6):497–509CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sacks J., Welch W. J., Mitchell T. J., Wynn H. P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci. (1989) 4(4):409–435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simpson T. W., Mauery T. M., Korte J. J., Mistree F. Comparison of response surface and Kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization. 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ ISSMO Sympos. Multidisciplinary Analysis Optim. (1998) (St. Louis, MO). September 2–4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steuer R. E.Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application (1986) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Stewart T. J., Karwan M. H., Spronk J., Wallenius J. Convergence and validation of interactive methods in MCDM: Simulation studies. Essays in Decision Making (1997) (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany) 7–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taguchi G.Introduction to Quality Engineering (1986) (UNIPUB/Quality Resources, White Plains, NY) Google Scholar
  • Tappeta R. V., Renaud J. E., Messac A., Sundararaj G. J. Interactive physical programming: Tradeoff analysis and decision making in multidisciplinary optimization. AIAA J. (2000) 38(5):917–926CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tawarmalani M., Sahinidis N. V.Convexification and Global Optimization in Continuous and Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming: Theory, Algorithms, Software, and Applications (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vining G. G., Myers R. H. Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. J. Quality Tech. (1990) 22(1):38–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wierzbicki A., Fandel G., Gal T. The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Theory and Application (1980) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 468–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.