Imprecise DEA via Standard Linear DEA Models with a Revisit to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1030.0072

References

  • Ali A. I., Seiford L. M. Computational accuracy and infinitesimals in data envelopment analysis. INFOR (1993) 31:290–297Google Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1978) 2:429–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Thrall R. M. A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiencies and inefficiencies in DEA. J. Productivity Anal. (1991) 2:197–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook W. D., Kress M., Seiford L. M. On the use of ordinal data in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1993) 44:133–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook W. D., Kress M., Seiford L. M. Data envelopment analysis in the presence of both quantitative and qualitative factors. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1996) 47:945–953CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper W. W., Park K. S., Yu G. IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Management Sci. (1999) 45:597–607LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper W. W., Park K. S., Yu G. An illustrative application of IDEA (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) to a Korean mobile telecommunication company. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(6):807–820LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M., Tone K.Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dyson R. G., Thanassoulis E. Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1988) 39:563–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golany B. A note on the inclusion of ordinal relations among multipliers in DEA. Management Sci. (1988) 34:1029–1033LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S. H., Park C. G., Park K. S. An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data. Comput. Oper. Res. (1999) 26:59–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seiford L. M., Zhu J. Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all the data. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1998a) 49:1060–1071CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seiford L. M., Zhu J. Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998b) 108(1):127–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seiford L. M., Zhu J. Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR (1999) 37:174–187Google Scholar
  • Thanassoulis E.Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson R. G., Dharmapala P. S., Gatewood E. J., Macy S., Thrall R. M. DEA/assurance region SBDC efficiency and unique projections. Oper. Res. (1996) 44:533–542LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thrall R. M. Duality, classification and slacks in DEA. Ann. Oper. Res. (1996) 66:109–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu J. Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 129(2):443–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu J.Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Zhu J. Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): A review and improvement with an application. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 144:513–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.