A General Equilibrium Model for Industries with Price and Service Competition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1040.0149

References

  • Anderson S. P., de Palma A., Thisse J. F.Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. J., Harris T., Marschak J. Optimal inventory policy. Econometrica (1951) 19(3):250–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey E., Graham D., Kaplan D.Deregulating the Airlines (1985) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Khosla I., Sinha K. K. Quality and competition. Management Sci. (1998) 44(9):1179–1192LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barlow R. E., Proschan F.Mathematical Theory of Reliability (1965) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Basuroy S., Nguyen D. Multinomial logit market share models: Equilibrium characteristics and strategic implications. Management Sci. (1998) 44(10):1396–1408LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell D., Keeney R., Little J. D. A market share theorem. J. Marketing Res. (1975) 136–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F., Federgruen A. Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. (2001) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F., Federgruen A. Coordination mechanisms for supply chains under price and service competition. (2002) . Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC and Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F., Federgruen A. Dynamic inventory and pricing models for competing retailers. Naval Res. Logist. (2004) 51(2):258–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63:841–890CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besanko D., Gupta S., Jain D. Logit demand estimation under competitive pricing behavior: An equilibrium framework. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):1533–1547LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caine G. J., Plaut R. H. Optimal inventory policy when stockouts alter demand. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1976) 23:1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlton D., Schmalensee R., Willig R. The theory and the facts of how markets clear. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) 2(Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Carlton D., Perloff J.Modern Industrial Organization (1999) (Longman Science & Technology, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Carr S., Duenyas I., Lovejoy W. The harmful effects of capacity improvements. (1999) . Working paper,University of Michigan, Business School. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  • Chain Store Age Inventory management 2002: Data, detail & discipline. (2002a) December(Murray Forseter Publisher/Editor, New York) Google Scholar
  • Chain Store Age Just what the buyer ordered? (2002b) January(Murray Forseter Publisher/Editor, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dana J. Competition in price and availability when availability is unobservable. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(3):497–513CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dixit A. Quality and quantity competition. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1979) 46(4):587–599CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorfman R. B., Steiner P. D. Optimal advertising and optimal quality. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1954) 44(December):826–836Google Scholar
  • Dvoretzky A., Kiefer J., Wolfowitz J. The inventory problem: I. Case of known distributions of demand. Econometrica (1952) 20:187–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ernst R., Cohen M. Coordination alternatives in a manufacturer/dealer inventory system under stochastic demand. Production Oper. Management (1992) 1:254–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ernst R., Powell S. Optimal inventory policies under service-sensitive demand. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1995) 87:316–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ernst R., Powell S. Manufacturer incentives to improve retail service levels. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998) 104:437–450CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federgruen A., Heching A. Combined pricing and inventory control under uncertainty. Oper. Res. (1999) 47(3):454–475LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Graham D., Kaplan D., Sibley D. Efficiency and competition in the airline industry. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14:118–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill T. W. A simple perturbed demand inventory model with ordering cost. Management Sci. (1976) 23(1):38–42LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jaskow P., Rose N., Schmalensee R., Willig R. The effects of economic regulation. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) 2(Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Karmarkar U., Pitbladdo R. Quality, class, and competition. Management Sci. (1997) 43(1):27–39LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirman A., Sobel M. Dynamic oligopoly with inventories. Econometrica (1974) 42(2):279–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leeflang P., Wittink D., Wedel M., Naert P.Building Models for Marketing Decisions (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li L. The role of inventory in delivery-time competition. Management Sci. (1992) 38(2):182–197LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan S., van Ryzin G., Tayur S., Magazine M., Ganeshan R. Retail inventories and consumer choice. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1999) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 491–551CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice among products. J. Bus. (1980) 53:513–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D. The choice theory of market research. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5:275–297LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica (1990) 58:1255–1277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson L. Appropriate inventory policies when service affects future demands. (1991) . Working paper, Johnson Graduate School of Business, Cornell University. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R., Thisse J. F. Perceptual maps and the optimal location of new products: An integrative essay. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1988) 5:225–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz B. L. A new approach to stockout penalties. Management Sci. (1966) 12(12):B538–B544LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz B. L. Optimal inventory policies in perturbed demand models. Management Sci. (1970) 16(8):B509–B518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seneta E.Non-Negative Matrices: An Introduction to Theory and Applications (1973) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Spence M. Monopoly, quality, and regulation. Bell J. Econom. (1975) 6(2):417–429CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M. Product selection fixed costs, and monopolistic competition. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1976) 43(2):217–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Topkis D.Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsay A., Agrawal N. Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(4):372–391LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Urban G. L., Hauser J. R.Design and Marketing of New Products (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Van Mieghem J., Dada M. Price versus production postponement: Capacity and competition. Management Sci. (1999) 45(12):1631–1649LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Villas-Boas J. M., Winer R. S. Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1324–1338LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.