A Nonparametric Approach to Multiproduct Pricing

References

• Coy P. The power of smart pricing. Bus. Week (2000) April 10):160Google Scholar
• Cunningham W. H. On submodular function minimization. Combinatorica (1985) 5:185–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobson G., Kalish S. Positioning and pricing a product line. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):107–125Link, Google Scholar
• Dobson G., Kalish S. Heuristics for pricing and positioning a product-line using conjoint and cost data. Management Sci. (1993) 39(2):160–175Link, Google Scholar
• Garey M. R., Johnson D. S.Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (1979) (Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ) Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Models and heuristics for product line selection. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(1):1–19Link, Google Scholar
• Grötschel M., Lováasz L., Schrijver A. The ellipsoid method and its consequences in combinatorial optimization. Combinatorica (1981) 1:169–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grötschel M., Lováasz L., Schrijver A.Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization (1988) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanson W., Martin K. Optimal bundle pricing. Management Sci. (1990) 36:155–174Link, Google Scholar
• Haussler D. Decision theoretic generalizations of the PAC model for neural net and other learning applications. Inform. Comput. (1992) 100(September):78–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iwata S., Fleischer L., Fujishigi S. A combinatorial, strongly polynomial-time algorithm for minimizing submodular functions. J. ACM (2001) 48(4):761–777Crossref, Google Scholar
• McBride R. D., Zufryden F. S. An integer programming approach to the optimal product line selection problem. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):126–140Link, Google Scholar
• McGill J. I., Van Ryzin G. Revenue management: Research overview and prospects. Transportation Sci. (1999) 33(2):233–256Link, Google Scholar
• McWilliams G. Lean machine: How Dell fine tunes its PC pricing to gain edge in a slow market. Wall Street J. (2001) June 8):A1Google Scholar
• Merrick A. Priced to move: Retailers try to get leg up on markdowns with new software. Wall Street J. (2001) August 7):A1Google Scholar
• Mirman L. J., Sibley D. Optimal nonlinear prices for multiproduct monopolies. Bell J. Econom. (1980) 11:659–670Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oren S., Smith S., Wilson R. Product line pricing. J. Bus. (1984) 57(1, pt. 2):S73–S99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oren S., Smith S., Wilson R. Multi-product pricing for electric power. Energy Econom. (1987) 9(2):104–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollard D.Convergence of Stochastic Processes (1984) (Springler Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P. A non-parametric approach to multi-product pricing: Theory and application. (2003) . Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Schrijver A. A combinatorial algorithm for minimizing submodular functions in strongly polynomial time. J. Combin. Theory (1971) B80:346–355Google Scholar
• Sen S. Issues in optimal product design. Analytic Approaches to Product and Marketing Planning: The Second Conference (1982) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) 265–274Google Scholar
• Shocker A. D., Srinivasan V. Multiattribute approaches for product concept evaluation and generation: A critical review. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16:159–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith S. New product pricing in quality sensitive markets. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(1):70–87Link, Google Scholar
• Spence A. M. Multi-product quantity-dependent prices and profitability constraints. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1980) 47:821–841Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topkis D.Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veinott A. F. Lectures in supply-chain optimization. (2002) . Course notes for Management Science and Engineering 361, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Weatherford L. R., Bodily S. E. A taxonomy and research overview of perishable-asset revenue management: Yield management, overbooking, and pricing. Management Sci. (1992) 40(5):831–844Google Scholar