Paradigm Change in Operations Research: Thirty Years of Debate

References

• Abbott A.The System of Professions: An Essay on the Expert Division of Labor (1988) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdel-Malek L., Wolf C., Johnson F., Spencer T. OR practice: Survey results and reflections of practising INFORMS members. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1999) 50:994–1003Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackoff R. L. Science in the systems age: Beyond IE, OR and MS. Oper. Res. (1973) 21:661–671Link, Google Scholar
• Ackoff R. L. A reply to the comments of Keith Chesterton, Robert Goodsman, Jonathan Rosenhead and Colin Thunhurst. Oper. Res. Quart. (1975) 26:96–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackoff R. L. Optimization + objectivity = opt out. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1977a) 1:1–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackoff R. L. National development planning revisited. Oper. Res. (1977b) 25:207–218Link, Google Scholar
• Ackoff R. L. The future of operational research is past. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1979a) 30:93–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackoff R. L. Resurrecting the future of operational research. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1979b) 30:189–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackoff R. L. President’s symposium: OR, a post mortem. Oper. Res. (1987) 35:471–474Link, Google Scholar
• Ackoff R. L., Emery F. E.On Purposeful Systems (1972) (Tavistock, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Brockelsby J. Intervening in the cultural constitution of systems—Methodological complementarism and other visions for systems research. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1995) 46:1285–1298Google Scholar
• Checkland P. B.Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (1981) (John Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Checkland P. B., Gass S. I., Harris C. M. Soft systems methodology. Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (2001) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) 767–770Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesterton K., Goodsman R., Rosenhead J., Thunhurst C. A comment on Ackoff’s “the social responsibility of operational research”. Oper. Res. Quart. (1975) 26:91–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchman C. W.The Design of Inquiring Systems (1971) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Churchman C. W., Schainblatt J. H. The researcher and the manager: A dialectic of implementation. Management Sci. (1965) 12:B40–B42Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett C. J., Van Wassenhove G. W. The natural drift: What happened to operations research? Oper. Res. (1993) 41:625–640Link, Google Scholar
• Dando M. R., Bennett P. G. A Kuhnian crisis in management science? J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1981) 32:939–942Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eden C., Jones S., Sims D.Thinking in Organizations (1979) (Macmillan, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Eilon S. Technician or adviser? Omega (1977) 5:1–6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eilon S. The role of management science. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1980) 31:253–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fildes R., Ranyard J. Success and survival of operational research groups. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1997) 48:336–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flood R. L., Jackson M. C.Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention (1991) (John Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Friend J. K., Jessop N.Local Government and Strategic Choice: An Operational Research Approach to the Problem of Strategic Planning (1969) (Pergamon, Oxford, UK) . (second ed., 1977)Google Scholar
• Friend J. K., Norris M. E., Stringer J. The Institute for Operational Research: An initiative to extend the scope of operational research. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1988) 39:205–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geoffrion A. M. Forces, trends, and opportunities in MS/OR. Oper. Res. (1992) 40:423–445Link, Google Scholar
• Hales M. Management science and the second industrial revolution. Radical Sci. J. (1974) 1:5–28Google Scholar
• Hansen P. A short discussion of the OR crisis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1989) 38:277–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keys P. OR as technology: Some issues and implications. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1989) 40:753–759Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keys P. OR as technology revisited. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1998) 49:99–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirby M. W. Operations research trajectories: The Anglo-American experience from the 1930s to 1990. Oper. Res. (2000) 48:661–670Link, Google Scholar
• Kirby M. W.Operational Research in War and Peace: The British Experience from the 1930s to 1970 (2003a) (Imperial College Press, London, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirby M. W. The intellectual journey of Russell Ackoff: From OR apostle to OR apostate. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2003b) 54:1127–1140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirby M. W., Rosenhead J. IFORS’ operational research hall of fame: Russell L. Ackoff. Internat. Trans. Oper. Res. (2005) 12:129–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J. Recent developments in management science. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1992) 43:1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miser H. Comment on “OR as technology”. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1991) 42:429–431Google Scholar
• Muller-Merbach H. Mutual understanding revisited after nearly 25 years. Systems Practice (1988) 1:385–397Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munro I., Mingers J. The use of multimethodology in practice—Results of a survey of practitioners. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2002) 53:369–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munro I., Mingers J. Response to Richard Ormerod. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2004) 55:90–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Operational Research Society Report of the commission on the future practice of operational research. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1986) 37:829–866Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. On the nature of OR—Entering the fray. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1996) 47:1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. Beyond internal OR groups. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1998) 49:420–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. Blackett, the father of OR. OR Insight (1999) 12:14–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. On the nature of OR: Taking stock. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2002) 53:475–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. The practice of UK OR practitioners. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2004a) 55:90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. Communication with M. W. Kirby. (2004b) Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. Communication with M. W. Kirby. (2005) Google Scholar
• Ranyard J. Commentary on Checkland: Achieving desirable and feasible change: An application of soft systems methodology. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2000) 51:1347–1348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravetz J. R.Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems (1971) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Rees R. A. On the “social responsibility” of operational research. Oper. Res. Quart. (1976) 17:265–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reisman A., Kirschnik F. The devolution of OR/MS: Implications from a statistical content analysis of papers in flagship journals. Oper. Res. (1994) 42:577–588Link, Google Scholar
• Rittel H. J. W., Webber M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. (1973) 4:155–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson R. Communication with M. W. Kirby. (2005) Google Scholar
• Rosenhead J. Some further comments on the social responsibility of operational research. Oper. Res. Quart. (1976) 27:266–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenhead J.Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict (1989) (John Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Rosenhead J., Mingers J.Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict (2001) (John Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Rosenhead J., Thunhurst C. A materialist analysis of operational research. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1982) 33:111–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson M. G. Those who can’t. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1978) 24:517–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stringer J. Operational research for “multi-organizations”. Oper. Res. Quart. (1967) 18:105–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thunhurst C. Who does operational research operate for? (1973) . Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Operational Research Society, Torquay, UKGoogle Scholar
• Tobin M. R., Rapley K., Teather W. The changing role of OR. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1980) 31:279–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickers G.The Art of Judgement (1965) (Chapman and Hall, London, UK) Google Scholar