Robust Mean-Covariance Solutions for Stochastic Optimization

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1060.0353

References

  • Arseneau L., Best M. J. Resolution of degenerate critical parameter values in parametric quadratic programming. (1999) . Working paper CORR 99-47, Department of Combinatorics and Optimization, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Bank B., Guddat J., Klatte D., Kummer B., Tammer K.Nonlinear Parametric Optimization (1982) (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell D. One switch utility functions and a measure of risk. Management Sci. (1988) 34(12):1416–1424LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. Robust optimization—Methodology and applications. Math. Programming Ser. B (2002) 92:453–480CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Best M. J., Riedmüller B., Fischer H., Schäffler S. An algorithm for the solution of the parametric quadratic programming problem. Applied Mathematics and Parallel Computing—Festschrift for Klaus Ritter (1996) (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany) 57–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birge J. R., Dulá J. H. Bounding separable recourse functions with limited distribution information. Ann. Oper. Res. (1991) 30:277–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birge J. R., Wets R. J.-B. Computing bounds for stochastic programming problems by means of a generalized moment problem. Math. Oper. Res. (1987) 12(1):149–162LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brockett P., Golden L. A class of utility functions containing all the common utility functions. Management Sci. (1987) 33(8):955–964LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints. Oper. Res. (1963) 11(1):18–39LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dokov S. P., Morton D. P. Higher-order upper bounds on the expectation of a convex function. (2002) . http://edoc.huberlin.de/series/speps/2002-8/pdf/8.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Dulá J. H., Murthy R. V. A Tchebysheff-type bound on the expectation of sublinear polyhedral functions. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(5):914–922LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dupačová J. On minimax solutions of stochastic linear programming problems. Časopis pro Pěstování Matematiky (1966) 91:423–429(as Žáčková)Google Scholar
  • Dupačová J., Floudas C. A., Pardalos P. M. Stochastic programming: Minimax approach. Encyclopedia of Optimization (2001) 5(Kluwer Academic Publishers)327–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dupačová J., Hurt J., Štěpán J.Stochastic Modeling in Economics and Finance (2002) (Kluwer)Google Scholar
  • El Ghaoui L., Oks M., Oustry F. Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: A conic programming approach. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(4):543–556LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. Solving bicriterion mathematical programs. Oper. Res. (1967a) 15(1):39–54LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. Stochastic programming with aspiration or fractile criteria. Management Sci. (1967b) 13(9):672–679LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. (1989) 18:141–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb D., Iyengar G. Robust portfolio selection problems. Math. Oper. Res. (2003) 28(1):1–38LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jagannathan R. Minimax procedure for a class of linear programs under uncertainty. Oper. Res. (1977) 25:173–177LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kall P., Guddat J., et al. Stochastic programming with recourse: Upper bounds and moment problems, a review. Advances in Mathematical Optimization (1988) (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 86–103Google Scholar
  • Karlin S., Studden W. J.Tchebycheff Systems: With Applications in Analysis and Statistics. Pure and Applied Mathematics, A Series of Texts and Monographs (1966) (Interscience Publishers, John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kira D., Ziemba W. T., Levy H., Sarnat M. Equivalence among alternative portfolio selection criteria. Financial Decision Making Under Uncertainty (1977) (Academic Press)151–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krein M. G., Nudelman A. A.The Markov Moment Problem and Extremal Problems. Translation of Mathematical Monographs (1977) 50(American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linsmeier T. J., Pearson N. D. Risk measurement: An introduction to value-at-risk. (1996) . Technical Report 96-04, OFOR, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Markowitz H. M.Portfolio Selection (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Popescu I. Optimal mean-covariance bounds for sums of positive risks: Applications in finance and insurance. (2005) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt J. Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1964) 32:122–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogosinsky W. W. Moments of non-negative mass. Proc. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. A (1958) 245:1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross S. Compensation, incentives, and the duality of risk aversion and riskiness. J. Finance (2004) 59(1):207–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rustem B., Becker R., Marty W. Robust min-max portfolio strategies for rival forecast and risk scenarios. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2000) 24:1591–1621CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scarf H., Arrow K. J., Karlin S., Scarf H. A min-max solution of an inventory problem. Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production (1958) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 201–209Google Scholar
  • Shapiro A., Kleywegt A. J. Minimax analysis of stochastic problems. Optim. Methods Software (2002) 17:523–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith J. Generalized Chebyshev inequalities: Theory and applications in decision analysis. Oper. Res. (1995) 43(5):807–825LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wolfe P. The simplex method for quadratic programming. Econometrica (1959) 27:382–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.