Congestion Pricing and Noncooperative Games in Communication Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0400

References

  • Anderson E., Kelly F., Steinberg R. A contract and balancing mechanism for sharing capacity in a communication network. Management Sci. (2006) 52:39–53LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernoulli D. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis (Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk). (1738) 175–192Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, Tomus V (Papers of the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Petersburg, Vol. V)Google Scholar
  • Blanchard O., Fisher S.Lectures on Macroeconomics (1989) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Cao J., Ramanan K. A Poisson limit for buffer overflow probabilities. Proc. IEEE Infocom (2002) 2New York:994–1003CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Floyd S. TCP and explicit congestion notification. ACM Comput. Comm. Rev. (1994) 24(5):10–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Levine D.The Theory of Learning in Games (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gibbens R. J., Kelly F. P. Resource pricing and the evolution of congestion control. Automatica (1999) 35:1969–1985CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haurie A., Marcotte P. On the relationship between Nash-Cournot and Wardrop equilibria. Networks (1985) 15:295–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johari R., Tan D. End-to-end congestion control for the Internet: Delays and stability. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking (2001) 9(6):818–832CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly F. P., Maulloo A., Tan D. Rate control in communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1998) 49:237–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunniyur S., Srikant R. Analysis and design of an adaptive virtual queue algorithm for active queue management. Proc. ACM Sigcomm Comput. Comm. Rev. (2001) 31(4):123–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Low S. H., Lapsley D. E. Optimization flow control—I: Basic algorithm and convergence. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking (1999) 7:861–875CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mackie-Mason J. K., Varian H. R., Sichel W., Alexander D. L. Some economics of the Internet. Networks, Infrastructure and the New Task for Regulation (1996) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) 107–136Google Scholar
  • Massoulié L. Stability of distributed congestion control with heterogeneous feedback delays. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (2002) 47(6):895–902CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massoulié L., Roberts J. Bandwidth sharing: Objectives and algorithms. Proc. IEEE Infocom. (1999) New York:1395–1403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raina G., Wischik D. Buffer sizes for large multiplexers: TCP queueing theory and instability analysis. Proc. EuroNGI Conf. Next Generation Internet Networks (2005) Rome, Italy:173–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramakrishnan K. K., Jain R. A binary feedback scheme for congestion avoidance in computer networks. ACM Trans. Comput. Systems (1990) 8:158–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shenker S. Fundamental design issues for the future Internet. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. (1995) 13:1176–1188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srikant R.The Mathematics of Internet Congestion Control (2004) (Birkhauser, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Varian H. R.Microeconomic Analysis (1992) 3rd ed.(W. W. Norton & Co., New York) Google Scholar
  • Vinnicombe G. On the stability of networks operating TCP-like congestion control. Proc. 15th IFAC World Congress Automatic Control (2002) Barcelona, SpainCrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.