Minimizing the Worst Slowdown: Offline, Online

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0447

References

  • Bansal N., Harchol-Balter M. Analysis of SRPT scheduling: Investigating unfairness. Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS (2001) (ACM Press, New York) 279–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal N., Wierman A. Competitive analysis of M/GI/1 queueing policies. (2002) . Mimeo, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Bender M., Chakrabarti S., Muthukrishnan S. Flow and stretch metrics for scheduling continuous job streams. Proc. 9th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (1998) (SIAM Press, Philadelphia, PA) 270–279Google Scholar
  • Chun Y. Consistency and monotonicity in sequencing problems. (2004) . Mimeo, Seoul National University, Seoul, South KoreaGoogle Scholar
  • Demers A., Keshav S., Shenker S. Analysis and simulation of a fair queuing algorithm. Internetworking: Res. Experience (1990) 1:3–26Google Scholar
  • Demko S., Hill T. Equitable distribution of indivisible objects. Math. Soc. Sci. (1988) 16(2):145–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubins L. F. Group decision devices. Amer. Math Monthly (1977) 84(May):350–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman E. J., Henderson S. G. Fairness and efficiency in Web server protocols. Proc. 2003 ACM SIGMETRICS Internat. Conf. Measurement Model. Comput. Systems (2003) (ACM Press, New York) 229–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman E. J., Henderson S. G., Hurley G. Minimizing mean response time subject to fairness. (2004) . Mimeo, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Harchol-Balter M., Bansal N., Schroeder B., Agrawal M. Size-based scheduling to improve Web performance. (2001) . Mimeo, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Maniquet F. A characterization of the Shapley value in queueing problems. J. Econom. Theory (2003) 109(1):90–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitra M. Mechanism design in queueing problems. Econom. Theory (2001) 17:277–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moulin H. Uniform externalities: Two axioms for fair allocation. J. Public Econom. (1990) 43(3):305–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moulin H. Welfare bounds in the fair division problem. J. Econom. Theory (1991) 54(2):321–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moulin H. Welfare bounds in the cooperative production problem. Games Econom. Behav. (1992) 4:373–401CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moulin H. Proportional scheduling, split-proofness and merge-proofness. (2004) . Mimeo, Rice University, Houston, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Queyranne M. Structure of a simple scheduling polyhedron. Math. Programming (1993) 58:263–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapley L. Core of convex games. Internat. J. Game Theory (1971) 1:11–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith W. Various optimizers for single-stage production. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1956) 3:59–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sprumont Y. Ordinal cost sharing. J. Econom. Theory (1998) 81:126–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suijs J. On incentive compatibility and budget balancedness in public decision making. Econom. Design (1996) 2:193–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomson W., Varian H., Hurwicz L., Schmeidler D., Sonnenschein H. Theories of justice based on symmetry. Social Goals and Social Organizations (1985) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 107–129Google Scholar
  • Wierman A., Harchol-Balter M. Bounds on a fair policy with near optimal performance. (2003a) . Mimeo, Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Wierman A., Harchol-Balter M. Classifying scheduling policies with respect to unfairness in an M/GI/1. Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS Conf. Measurement Model. Comput. Systems (2003b) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolff R. W.Stochastic Modeling and the Theory of Queues (1989) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Prentice-Hall Series in Industrial and Systems EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  • Wolsey L. A. Mixed integer programming formulations for production planning and scheduling problems. 12th Internat. Sympos. Math. Programming (1985) (SIAM Press, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.