TECHNICAL NOTE—Spatial Queueing Analysis of an Interdiction System to Protect Cities from a Nuclear Terrorist Attack

References

• Atkinson M. P., Cao Z., Wein L. M. Optimal stopping analysis of a radiation detection system to protect cities from a nuclear terrorist attack. Risk Anal. (2008) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D. J., van Ryzin G. Stochastic and dynamic vehicle routing in the Euclidean plane with multiple capacitated vehicles. Oper. Res. (1993) 41:60–76Link, Google Scholar
• Bunn M., Wier A., Holdren J. P. Controlling nuclear warheads and materials: A report card and action plan. (2003) . Project on Managing the Atom, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Flynn S. E. Beyond border control. Foreign Affairs (2000) 79:57–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasstone S., Dolan P. J.The Effects of Nuclear Weapons (1977) 3rd ed.(U.S. Dept. of Defense, Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross D., Harris C. M.Fundamentals of Queueing Theory (1985) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Heyman D. P., Sobel M. J.Stochastic Models in Operations Research (1982) 1(McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Huizenga D. Detecting nuclear weapons and radiological materials: How effective is available technology? (2005) . Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Prevention of Nuclear and Biological Attacks and the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Science and Technology, The House Committee on Homeland Security, June 21, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Kaplan E. H., Kress M. Operational effectiveness of suicide-bomber-detector schemes: A best-case analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2005) 102:10399–10404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson R. C., Odoni A. R.Urban Operations Research (1981) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Lipton E. U.S. to spend $1.2 billion on detecting radiation. The New York Times (2006) July 15):A10Google Scholar
• Lipton E. New York to test ways to prevent nuclear terror. The New York Times (2007) Feburary 9):A1Google Scholar
• Pan F., Charlton W. S., Morton D. P., Woodruff D. L. A stochastic program for interdicting smuggled nuclear material. Network Interdiction and Stochastic Programming (2003) (Kluwer, Boston) 1–19Chapter 1Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rooney B. Detecting nuclear weapons and radiological materials: How effective is available technology? (2005) . Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Prevention of Nuclear and Biological Attacks and the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Science and Technology, The House Committee on Homeland Security, June 21, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Stana R. M. Summary of challenges faced in targeting oceangoing cargo containers for inspection. (2004) . U.S. General Accounting Office Report GAO-04-557T, March 31, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Homeland Security Fact sheet: Domestic nuclear detection office. (2005) . Retrieved September 23 http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?theme=43&content=4474&print=trueGoogle Scholar
• Washburn A., Wood K. Two-person zero-sum games for network interdiction. Oper. Res. (1995) 43:243–251Link, Google Scholar
• Wein L. M., Atkinson M. P. The last line of defense: Designing and managing radiation sensor arrays around cities. IEEE Trans. Nuclear Sci. (2007) 54:654–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wein L. M., Wilkins A. H., Baveja M., Flynn S. E. Preventing the importation of illicit nuclear materials in shipping containers. Risk Anal. (2006) 26:1377–1393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wollmer R. D. Removing arcs from a network. J. Oper. Res. Soc. America (1964) 12:934–940Link, Google Scholar
• Woodruff D. L.Network Interdiction and Stochastic Programming (2003) (Kluwer, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar