The OR/MS Ecosystem: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1080.0519

References

  • Abdel-Malek L., Wolf C., Johnson F., Spencer T. OR practice: Survey results and reflections of practising INFORMS members. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1999) 50(10):994–1003CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ackoff R. L. The future of operational research is past. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1979) 30(2):93–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ackoff R. L. Presidents' symposium: OR, a post mortem. Oper. Res. (1987) 35(3):471–474LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Apt K. R., Olderog E. R.Verification of Sequential and Concurrent Programs (1991) (Springer Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Apte U. M., Nath H. K. Size, structure and growth of the US information economy. (2004) . Working paper, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX. http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/documents/areas/ctr/bit/ApteNath.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Armacost A. P., Lowe J. K. Operations research capstone course: A project-based process of discovery and applications. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2003) 3(2):1–25LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell P. C., Anderson C. K. In search of strategic operations research/management science. Interfaces (2002) 32(2):28–40LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P., Tsitsiklis J. N.Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods (1989) (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey) Google Scholar
  • Birge J. Where do we want OR to go in education and vice versa? INFORMS Annual Meeting (2006) Pittsburgh http://uclacluster.jot.com/EducationGoogle Scholar
  • Brown G. Greatest hits in operations research. INFORMS Annual Meeting (2006) . http://uclacluster.jot.com/ResearchGoogle Scholar
  • Chandy K. M., Misra J.Parallel Program Design: A Foundation (1988) (Addison-Wesley, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Chopra S., Sodhi M. S. Finding the bang for the RFID buck in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management Rev. (2007) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • CONDOR Operations research: The next decade. Oper. Res. (1988) 36(4):619–637LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., Van Wassenhove L. N. The natural drift: What happened to operations research? Oper. Res. (1993) 41(4):625–640LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dawson C. S., McCallum C. J., Murphy R. B., Wolman E. Operations research at Bell Laboratories through the 1970s: Part I. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(2):205–215LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dijkstra E. W.A Discipline of Programming (1976) (Prentice-Hall Series in Automatic Computation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Economist, The Go with the flow. (2007) March 8). Retrieved April 4, 2008, http://www.economist.com/search/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8766053Google Scholar
  • Fildes R., Raynard J. C. Success and survival of operational research groups: A review. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1997) 48(4):336–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fildes R., Raynard J. C., Crylmble W. R. The management of OR groups: Results of a survey. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1999) 50(6):563–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fraiman N. Building relationships between universities and businesses: The case at Columbia Business School. Interfaces (2002) 32(2):52–55LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gass S. I., Harris C. M.Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M. Forces, trends, and opportunities in MS/OR. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(3):423–445LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M., Krishnan R. Prospects for operations research in the e-business era. Interfaces (2001) 31(2):6–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M., Krishnan R. E-business and management science: Mutual impacts (Part 1 of 2). Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1275–1286LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Groleau T. G. Spreadsheets will not save OR/MS! OR/MS Today (1999) 26(1Google Scholar
  • Grossman T. A. Causes of the decline of the business school management science courses. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2001) 1(2):51–61LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman T. A. Student consulting projects benefit faculty and industry. Interfaces (2002) 32(2):42–48LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman T. A. Getting down to business. OR/MS Today (2003) 30(3):78Google Scholar
  • Guide V. D., Van Wassenhove L. N. Special issue on closed-loop supply chains. Production Oper. Management (2006) 15(3–4Google Scholar
  • Hoare C. A. R. An axiomatic basis for computer programming. Comm. ACM (1969) 12(10):576–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoare C. A. R. Communicating sequential processes. Comm. ACM (1978) 21(8):666–677CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman K. Opportunities and challenges for OR in the next five years. INFORMS Annual Meeting (2006) Pittsburgh http://uclacluster.jot.com/GettingThereGoogle Scholar
  • Horner P. The science of better synergy. OR/MS Today (2004) 31(6Google Scholar
  • INFORMS Roundtable Where do we want to go in OR/MS practice? INFORMS Annual Meeting (2006) Pittsburgh http://uclacluster.jot.com/PracticeGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan E., Lasdon L., Lenard M., Moore J., Powell S., Willemain T. OR/MS and MBA. OR/MS Today (1997) 24(1):36–41Detailed 2/96 report available at http://education.forum.informs.org/magnanti.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Karmarkar U. Leading a double life. INFORMS Annual Meeting (2006) Pittsburgh http://uclacluster.jot.com/ResearchGoogle Scholar
  • Keller C., Kros J. Teaching communication in an MBA operations research/management science course. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2000) 51(12):1433–1439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kettinger W. J., Grover V., Guha S., Segars A. H. Strategic information systems revisited: A study in sustainability and performance. Management Inform. System Quart. (1994) 18(1):31–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirby M. W. Operations research trajectories: The Anglo-American experience from the 1940s to the 1990s. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(5):661–670LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. L. Personal communication to C. S. Tang. (2006) . Stanford Business School, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien G. L. MS/OR: A mid-life crisis. Interfaces (1987) 17(2):35–38LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Magnanti T. Engineering education and operations research. INFORMS Annual Meeting (2006) Pittsburgh http://uclacluster.jot.com/EducationGoogle Scholar
  • Martin-Vega L. A., Seiford L. M., Senich D. GOALI: A National Science Foundation university-industry liaison program. Interfaces (2002) 32(2):56–62LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mesquita M. A., Santoro M. C. Analysis of models and practices in production and inventory management: A case study in Brazilian pharmaceutical industry. Revista Producao (2004) 14(1):64–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miyaoka J. Making operations management fun: Littlefield Technologies. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2005) 5(2). http://ite.pubs.informs.org/Vol5No2/Miyaoka/Google Scholar
  • Moore F. J. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(3):75–86Google Scholar
  • Ormerod R. J. Beyond internal OR groups. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1998) 49(4):420–429CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ormerod R. J. On the nature of OR: Taking stock. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2002) 53(5):475–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell S. Teaching modeling in management science. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2001) 1(2):62–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ratliff D. It is not a fair world. INFORMS Annual Meeting (2006) Pittsburgh http://uclacluster.jot.com/researchGoogle Scholar
  • Reisman A., Kirschnick F. The devolution of OR/MS: Implications from a statistical content analysis of papers in flagship journals. Oper. Res. (1994) 42(4):577–588LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H. Editorial: Leveling the field? The fourth Interfaces ranking of universities' contribution to the practice literature. Interfaces (2002) 32(2):23–27LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz K. Personal communication to M. S. Sodhi. (2007) Google Scholar
  • Sodhi M. S. Applications and opportunities for operations research in Internet-enabled supply chains and electronic marketplaces. Interfaces (2001) 31(2):56–69LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sodhi M. S. How to do strategic supply chain planning. Sloan Management Rev. (2003) 45(1):69–75Google Scholar
  • Sodhi M. S., Son B. G. What industry employers want from OR/MS graduates: Inferences from the content analysis of a thousand O.R. job ads. (2007) . Working paper, Cass Business School, City University LondonGoogle Scholar
  • Tang C. S. How to create change within the Camelot? INFORMS Annual Meeting (2006) Pittsburgh http://uclacluster.jot.com/GettingThereGoogle Scholar
  • Verter V., Boyaci T. Special issue on reverse logistics. Comput. Oper. Res. (2007) 34(2):295–619CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner H. M., Rothkopf M. H., Thomas C. J., Miser H. J. The next decade in operations research: Comments on the CONDOR report. Oper. Res. (1989) 37(4):664–672LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.