Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Control: Uncertainty and Competition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0718

References

  • Adida E., Perakis G. A robust optimization approach to dynamic pricing and inventory control with no backorders. Math. Programming Special Issue on Robust Optim. (2006) 107(1–2):97–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. J., Debreu G. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica (1954) 22:265–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Başar T., Olsder G. J.Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory (1995) 2nd ed.(Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. Robust convex optimization. Math. Oper. Res. (1998) 23:769–805LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berridge S., Krawczyk J. B. Relaxation algorithms in finding Nash equilibria. (1997) . Economics Working Paper Archive, Computational Economics Series, Washington University, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D., Sim M. The price of robustness. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(1):35–53LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D., Thiele A. A robust optimization approach to inventory theory. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(1):150–168LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cavazzuti E., Pappalardo M., Passacantando M. Nash equilibria, variational inequalities, and dynamical systems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (2002) 114(3):491–506CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan L. M. A., Shen Z. J. M., Simchi-Levi D., Swann J. L., Simchi-Levi D., Wu S. D., Shen Z. J. M. Coordination of pricing and inventory decisions: A survey and classification. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York) 335–392International Series in Operations Research and Management ScienceChapter 9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cubiotti P. Generalized quasi-variational inequalities in infinite-dimensional normed spaces. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1997) 92(3):457–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daniel J. W. Stability of the solution of definite quadratic programs. Math. Programming (1973) 5:41–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dockner E., Jørgensen S., Van Long N., Sorger G.Differential Games in Economics and Management Science (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elmaghraby W., Keskinocak P. Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: Research overview, current practices, and future directions. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1287–1309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haurie A. Environmental coordination in dynamic oligopolistic markets. Group Decision and Negotiation (1995) 4(1):39–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jørgensen S., Kort P. M., Zaccour G. Production, inventory, and pricing under cost and demand learning effects. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1999) 117:382–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mosco U., Dold A., Eckmann B. Implicit variational problems and quasi-variational inequalities. Nonlinear Operators and the Calculus of Variations (1976) 543(Springer-Verlag, Brussels) 83–156Lecture Notes in MathematicsCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pang J. S., Fukushima M. Quasivariational inequalities, generalized Nash equilibria, and multi-leader-follower games. Computational Management Sci. (2005) 1:21–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen J. B. Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave n-person games. Econometrica (1965) 33(3):520–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talluri K., van Ryzin G.The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (2004) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uryas'ev S., Rubinstein R. Y. On relaxation algorithms in computation of noncooperative equilibria. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1994) 39(6):1263–1267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vives X.Oligopoly Pricing. Old Ideas and New Tools (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.