Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0754

References

  • Ankenman B., Nelson B. L., Staum J. Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Proc. Winter Simulation Conf. (2008) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 362–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barton R. R., Meckesheimer M., Henderson S. G., Nelson B. L. Metamodel-based simulation optimization. Elsevier Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation (2006) (Elsevier, New York) . Chapter 19Google Scholar
  • Biles W. E., Kleijnen J. P. C., van Beers W. C. M., Nieuwenhuyse I. Kriging metamodeling in constrained simulation optimization: An exploratory study. Proc. 2007 Winter Simulation Conf. (2007) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 355–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boesel J., Nelson B. L., Kim S. Using ranking and selection to “clean up” after simulation optimization. Oper. Res. (2003) 51:814–825LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng R. C. H., Kleijnen J. P. C. Improved design of queueing simulation experiments with highly heteroscedastic responses. Oper. Res. (1998) 47:762–777LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cressie N. A. C.Statistics for Spatial Data (1993) (Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang K. T., Li R., Sudjianto A.Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments (2006) (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL) Google Scholar
  • Kennedy M. C., O'Hagan A. Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika (2000) 87:1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleijnen J. P. C., van Beers W. C. M. Robustness of Kriging when interpolating in random simulation with heterogeneous variances: Some experiments. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 165:826–834CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Law A. M., Kelton W. D.Simulation Modeling and Analysis (2000) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mitchell T. J., Morris M. D. The spatial correlation function approach to response surface estimation. Proc. 1992 Winter Simulation Conf. (1992) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 565–571CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers R. H., Montgomery D. C.Response Surface Methodology (2002) 2nd ed.(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nelson B. L. Control-variate remedies. Oper. Res. (1990) 38:974–992LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nozari A., Arnold S. F., Pegden C. D. Statistical analysis for use with the Schruben and Margolin correlation induction strategy. Oper. Res. (1987) 35:127–139LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O'Hagan A., Forster J. J.Bayesian Inference (2004) 2nd ed.(Oxford University Press, London) Google Scholar
  • Sabuncuoglu I., Touhami S. Simulation metamodeling with neural networks: An experimental investigation. Internat. J. Production Res. (2002) 40:2483–2505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sacks J., Welch W. J., Mitchell T. J., Wynn H. P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci. (1989) 4:409–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santner T. J., Williams B. J., Notz W. I.The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (2003) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schruben L. W., Margolin B. H. Pseudorandom number assignment in statistically designed simulation and distribution sampling experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1978) 73:504–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Searle S. R., Casella G., McCulloch C. E.Variance Components (1992) (Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein M. L.Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging (1999) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stump G., Lego S., Yukish M., Simpson T. W., Donndelinger J. A., Liou F. Visual steering commands for trade space exploration: User-guided sampling with example. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences—Design Automation Conf. (2007) September 4–7(ASME, Las Vegas, NV) . DETC2007/DAC-34684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tew J. D., Wilson J. R. Validation of simulation analysis methods for the Schruben-Margolin correlation-induction strategy. Oper. Res. (1992) 40:87–103LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tew J. D., Wilson J. R. Estimating simulation metamodels using combined correlation-based variance reduction techniques. IIE Trans. (1994) 26:2–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Beers W. C. M., Kleijnen J. P. C. Kriging for interpolation in random simulation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2003) 54:255–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Beers W. C. M., Kleijnen J. P. C. Customized sequential designs for random simulation experiments: Kriging metamodeling and bootstrapping. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2008) 186:1099–1113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whitt W. Planning queueing simulations. Management Sci. (1989) 35:1341–1366LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang F., Ankenman B. E., Nelson B. L. Efficient generation of cycle time-throughput curves through simulation and metamodeling. Naval Res. Logist. (2007) 54:78–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.