Differential Characteristics of Efficient Frontiers in Data Envelopment Analysis

References

• Asmild M., Paradi J. C., Reese D. N. Theoretical perspectives of trade-off analysis using DEA. Omega (2006) 34:337–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Maindiratta A. Piecewise loglinear estimation of efficient production surfaces. Management Sci. (1986) 32:126–135Link, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Thrall R. M. Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1992) 62:74–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Charnes A., Cooper W. W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. (1984) 30:1078–1092Link, Google Scholar
• Blackorby C., Russell R. R. Will the real elasticity of substitution please stand up? (A comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima elasticities.). Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79:882–888Google Scholar
• Bougnol M.-L., Dulá J. H. Anchor points in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2009) 192:668–676Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1978) 2:429–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Golany B., Seiford L., Stutz J. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J. Econometrics (1985) 30:91–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper W. W., Park K. S., Ciurana J. T. P. Marginal rates and elasticities of substitution with additive models in DEA. J. Productivity Anal. (2000) 13:105–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M., Tone K.Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses (2006) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Courant R.Differential and Integral Calculus (1967) II(Blackie and Son, London) Google Scholar
• Førsund F. R., Hjalmarsson L. Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2004) 55:1023–1038Crossref, Google Scholar
• Førsund F. R., Kittelsen S. A. C., Krivonozhko V. E. Farrell revisited—visualising properties of DEA production frontiers. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2009) 60:1535–1545Crossref, Google Scholar
• Førsund F. R., Hjalmarsson L., Krivonozhko V. E., Utkin O. B. Calculation of scale elasticities in DEA models: Direct and indirect approaches. J. Productivity Anal. (2007) 28:45–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadjicostas P., Soteriou A. C. One-sided elasticities and technical efficiency in multi-output production: A theoretical framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006) 168:425–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanoch G. Homotheticity in joint production. J. Econom. Theory (1970) 2:423–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansen L.Production Functions: An Integration of Micro and Macro, Short Run and Long Run Aspects (1972) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
• Krivonozhko V. E., Volodin A. V., Sablin I. A., Patrin M. Constructions of economic functions and calculation of marginal rates in DEA using parametric optimization methods. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2004) 55:1049–1058Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen T. Weak disposability in nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (2005) 87:1077–1082Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mills H. D., Kuhn H. W., Tucker A. W. Marginal values of matrix games and linear programs. Linear Equalities and Related Systems (1952) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 183–193Google Scholar
• Olesen O. B., Petersen N. C. Indicators of ill-conditioned data sets and model misspecification in data envelopment analysis: An extended facet approach. Management Sci. (1996) 42:205–219Link, Google Scholar
• Panzar J. C., Willig R. D. Economies of scale in multi-output production. Quart. J. Econom. (1977) 91:481–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podinovski V. V. Efficiency and returns to scale on the “no free lunch” assumption only. J. Productivity Anal. (2004a) 22:227–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podinovski V. V. Bridging the gap between the constant and variable returns-to-scale models: Selective proportionality in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2004b) 55:265–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podinovski V. V. Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2004c) 55:1311–1322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podinovski V. V., Førsund F. R., Krivonozhko V. E. A simple derivation of scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2009) 197:149–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar R. T.Convex Analysis (1970) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen D., Schaffnit C., Paradi J. C. Marginal rates and two-dimensional level curves in DEA. J. Productivity Anal. (1998) 9:205–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruggiero J. Nonparametric estimation of returns to scale in the public sector with an application to the provision of educational services. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2000) 51:906–912Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvanes K. G., Tjøtta S. Productivity differences in multiple output industries: An empirical application to electricity distribution. J. Productivity Anal. (1994) 5:23–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheel H., Scholtes S. Continuity of DEA efficiency measures. Oper. Res. (2003) 51:149–159Link, Google Scholar
• Shapiro J. F.Mathematical Programming: Structures and Algorithms (1979) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Starrett D. A. Measuring returns to scale in the aggregate, and the scale effect of public goods. Econometrica (1977) 45:1439–1455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis E.Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar