TECHNICAL NOTE—Robust Newsvendor Competition Under Asymmetric Information

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0858

References

  • Aghassi M., Bertsimas D. Robust game theory. Math. Programming (2006) 107(1–2):231–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andraski J. C., Haedicke J. CPFR: Time for the breakthrough? Supply Chain Management Rev. (2003) 7(3):54–60Google Scholar
  • Bitran G., Caldentey R., Vial R. Pricing policies for perishable products with demand substitution. (2006) . Technical report, Stern School of Business, New York UniversityGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J. C. Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, Part I–III. Management Sci. (1967) 14(3):159–182LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hays C. L. What Wal-Mart knows about customers' habits. New York Times (2004) November 14Google Scholar
  • Kraiselburd S., Narayanan V. G., Raman A. Contracting in a supply chain with stochastic demand and substitute products. Production Oper. Management (2004) 13(1):46–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li L. Cournot oligopoly with information sharing. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(4):521–536CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., McCardle K. F. The competitive newsboy. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(1):54–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan S., van Ryzin G. Inventory competition under dynamic consumer choice. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(5):646–657LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGillivray A. R., Silver E. A. Some concepts for inventory control under substitutable demand. INFOR (1978) 16(1):47–63Google Scholar
  • Myerson R. B. Comments on “Games with incomplete information played by ‘Bayesian’ players, I–III”. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1818–1824LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J. Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. (1951) 54(2):286–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Netessine S., Rudi N. Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(2):329–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Netessine S., Shumsky R. A. Revenue management games: Horizontal and vertical competition. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):813–831LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Netessine S., Zhang F. Positive vs. negative externalities in inventory management: Implications for supply chain design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(1):58–73LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parlar M. Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands. Naval Res. Logist. (1988) 35(3):397–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perakis G., Roels G. The price of anarchy in supply chains: Quantifying the efficiency of price-only contracts. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1249–1268LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perakis G., Roels G. Regret in the newsvendor model with partial information. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(1):188–203LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perakis G., Sood A. Competitive multi-period pricing for perishable products: A robust optimization approach. Math. Programming (2006) 107(1–2):295–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savage L. The theory of statistical decisions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1951) 46:55–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singer T. Sharer beware: Are you giving away too much information about your business? Inc. (1999) April 1):38–48Google Scholar
  • Vairaktarakis G. L. Robust multi-item newsboy models with a budget constraint. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2000) 66(3):213–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Q., Parlar M. A three-person game theory model arising in stochastic inventory control theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1994) 76(1):83–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yue J., Chen B., Wang M. C. Expected value of distribution information for the newsvendor problem. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(6):1128–1136LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu Z., Zhang J., Ye Y. Newsvendor optimization with limited distribution information. (2006) . Technical report, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.