Risk Analysis of Collateralized Debt Obligations
Published Online:30 Dec 2010https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0864
References
- BSLP: Markovian bivariate spread-loss model for portfolio credit derivatives. J. Comput. Finance (2008) 12:77–100Crossref, Google Scholar
- Premia for correlated default risk. (2008a) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
- Exploring the sources of default clustering. (2008b) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
- Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis (1992) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Calibration of CDO tranches with the dynamical generalized-Poisson loss model. Risk (2007) 20(5):70–75Google Scholar
- Fast pricing of basket default swaps. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(2):286–303Link, Google Scholar
- How large can jump-to-default risk premia be? Modeling contagion via the updating of beliefs. (2009) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
- Recovering portfolio default intensities implied by CDO quotes. (2008) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkCrossref, Google Scholar
- Common failings: How corporate defaults are correlated. J. Finance (2007) 62:93–117Crossref, Google Scholar
- Probabilities and Potential (1982) (North Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
- Dynamic frailties and credit portfolio modeling. Risk (2006) 19(1):101–109Google Scholar
- Time-changed birth processes and multiname credit derivatives. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(4):990–1005Link, Google Scholar
- Risk and valuation of collateralized debt obligations. Financial Analysts J. (2001) 57(1):41–59Crossref, Google Scholar
- Frailty correlated default. J. Finance (2009) 64:2089–2123Crossref, Google Scholar
- Computational techniques for basic affine models of portfolio credit risk. J. Comput. Finance (2009) 15:63–97Crossref, Google Scholar
- Affine point processes and portfolio credit risk. SIAM J. Financial Math. (2010) 1:642–665Crossref, Google Scholar
- A top-down approach to multiname credit. Oper. Res. (2011) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
- Numerical solution of jump-diffusion LIBOR market models. Finance Stochastics (2003) 7:1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
- Moody's senior ratings algorithm and estimated senior ratings. (2005) . Moody's Investors ServiceGoogle Scholar
- Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika (1971) 58(1):83–90Crossref, Google Scholar
- Good and bad credit contagion: Evidence from credit default swaps. J. Financial Econom. (2007) 84(3):860–883Crossref, Google Scholar
- Default clustering and valuation of collateralized debt obligations. (2009) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Correlation in corporate defaults: Contagion or conditional independence? (2009) . Working paper, Copenhagen Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
- Simulation of nonhomogeneous Poisson processes by thinning. Naval Logist. Quart. (1979) 26:403–413Crossref, Google Scholar
- An empirical analysis of collateralized debt obligations. J. Finance (2008) 63(2):529–563Crossref, Google Scholar
- Two-dimensional Markovian model for dynamics of aggregate credit loss. Adv. Econometrics (2008) 22:243–274Crossref, Google Scholar
- Semi-analytical valuation of basket credit derivatives in intensity-based models. J. Derivatives (2006) 13:8–26Crossref, Google Scholar
- The asymptotic behavior of maximum likelihood estimators of stationary point processes. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. (1978) 30(A):243–261Crossref, Google Scholar
- On Lewis' simulation method for point processes. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory (1981) 27:23–31Crossref, Google Scholar
- Multiscale intensity models and name grouping for valuation of multi-name credit derivatives. Appl. Math. Finance (2007) 15(1):73–105Crossref, Google Scholar
- A fast unbinned test of event clustering in Poisson processes. (1999) . Working paper, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- SEC Summary report of issues identified in the commission staff's examinations of select credit rating agencies. (2008) . Report, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

