Algorithms for Scheduling Runway Operations Under Constrained Position Shifting

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0869

References

  • Anagnostakis I., Clarke J.-P., Böhme D., Völckers U. Runway operations planning and control: Sequencing and scheduling. J. Aircraft (2001) 38(6):988–996CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anagnostakis I., Idris H. R., Clarke J.-P., Feron E., Hansman R. J., Odoni A. R., Hall W. D. A conceptual design of a departure planner decision aid. (2000) 3rd USA/Europe ATM R&D SeminarNaples, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  • Arkind K. D. Requirements for a novel terminal area capacity enhancement concept in 2022. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Guidance, Navigation and Control Conf. Exhibit (2004) Providence, RI(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atkins S., Brinton C. Concept description and development plan for the surface management system. J. Air Traffic Control (2002) 44(1Google Scholar
  • Beasley J. E., Krishnamoorthy M., Sharaiha Y. M., Abramson D. Scheduling aircraft landings—The static case. Transportation Sci. (2000) 34(2):180–197LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boehme D., Winter H., Nüsser H.-G. Improved airport surface traffic management by planning. Advanced Technologies for Air Traffic Flow Management (1994) (Springer, Berlin) 191–224Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science 198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Böhme D. Tactical departure management with the Eurocontrol/DLR DMAN. (2005) 6th USA/Europe ATM R&D SeminarBaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  • Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2007) . Accessed August 2008, http://www.bts.govGoogle Scholar
  • Carr F. R. Robust decision-support tools for airport surface traffic. (2004) . Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Cormen T. H., Leiserson C. E., Rivest R. L.Introduction to Algorithms (1990) (MIT Press—McGraw-Hill, Cambridge, MA) 536Google Scholar
  • de Neufville R., Odoni A. R.Airport Systems: Planning, Design and Management (2003) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dear R. G. The dynamic scheduling of aircraft in the near terminal area. (1976) . MIT Flight Transportation Laboratory Report R76-9, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  • Dear R. G., Sherif Y. S. An algorithm for computer assisted sequencing and scheduling of terminal area operations. Transportation Res., Part A, Policy Practice (1991) 25(2–3):129–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federal Aviation Administration Airport capacity benchmark report. (2004) . http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/publications/benchGoogle Scholar
  • Federal Aviation Administration Air traffic control: Order 7110.65P. Incl. Change 1, effective 8/3/06. (2006) . Accessed October 2006, http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/atc/Google Scholar
  • Federal Aviation Administration (2009) . Accessed October 2009, http://aspm.faa.gov/main/opsnet.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Idris H. R., Delcaire B., Anagnostakis I., Hall W. D., Pujet N., Feron E., Hansman R. J., Clarke J.-P., Odoni A. R. Identification of flow constraint and control points in departure operations at airport systems. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Guidance, Navigation and Control Conf., AIAA-1998-4291 (1998) Boston(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. Tradeoff evaluation of scheduling algorithms for terminal-area air traffic control. (2008) . Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Neuman F., Erzberger H. Analysis of delay reducing and fuel saving sequencing and spacing algorithms for arrival spacing. (1991) . NASA technical report A-91203; NAS 1.15:103880; NASA-TM-103880. Retrieved August 2008, NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)Google Scholar
  • Psaraftis H. N. A dynamic programming approach for sequencing groups of identical jobs. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(6):1347–1359LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Trivizas D. A. Optimal scheduling with maximum position shift (MPS) constraints: A runway scheduling application. J. Navigation (1998) 51(2):250–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willemain T. R., Fan H., Ma H. Statistical analysis of intervals between projected airport arrivals. (2004) . DSES Technical Report 38-04-510, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NYGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.