Information Collection on a Graph

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0873

References

  • Barabási A. L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286(5439):509–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechhofer R. E., Santner T. J., Goldsman D. M.Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening and Multiple Comparisons (1995) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bernardo J. M., Smith A. F. M.Bayesian Theory (1994) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branke J., Chick S. E., Schmidt C. Selecting a selection procedure. Management Sci. (2007) 53(12):1916–1932LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chick S., Gans N. Economic analysis of simulation selection options. Management Sci. (2009) 55(3):421–437LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chick S. E., Frazier P. I., Rosetti M. D., Hill R. R., Johansson B., Dunkin A., Ingalls R. G. The conjunction of the knowledge gradient and the economic approach to simulation selection. Proc. 2009 Winter Simulation Conf. (2009) (IEEE, Austin, TX) 528–539CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chick S. E., Inoue K. New procedures to select the best simulated system using common random numbers. Management Sci. (2001a) 47(8):1133–1149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chick S. E., Inoue K. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Oper. Res. (2001b) 49(5):732–743LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chick S. E., Branke J., Schmidt C. Sequential sampling to myopically maximize the expected value of information. INFORMS J. Comput. (2010) 22(1):71–80LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dearden R., Friedman N., Russell S. Bayesian Q-learning. Proc. Fifteenth National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98) (1998) (AAAI Press/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • DeGroot M. H.Optimal Statistical Decisions (1970) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Duff M. O., Barto A. G. Local bandit approximation for optimal learning problems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (1996) 9(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 1019–1025Google Scholar
  • Erdős P., Renyi A. On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae (1959) 6:290–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan Y. Y., Kalaba R. E., Moore J. E. Shortest paths in stochastic networks with correlated link costs. Comput. Math. Appl. (2005) 49(9–10):1549–1564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frazier P. I., Powell W. B. Consistency of sequential Bayesian sampling policies. SIAM J. Control Optim. (2011) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frazier P. I., Powell W. B., Dayanik S. A knowledge gradient policy for sequential information collection. SIAM J. Control Optim. (2008) 47(5):2410–2439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frazier P. I., Powell W. B., Dayanik S. The knowledge-gradient policy for correlated normal rewards. INFORMS J. Comput. (2009) 21(4):599–613LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frieze A., Grimmett G. The shortest-path problem for graphs with random arc-lengths. Discrete Appl. Math. (1985) 10(1):57–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A. B., Carlin J. B., Stern H. S., Rubin D. B.Bayesian Data Analysis (2004) 2nd ed.(CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) Google Scholar
  • Gilbert E. N. Random graphs. Ann. Math. Statist. (1959) 30(4):1141–1144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittins J. C.Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Goldsman D. Ranking and selection in simulation. Proc. 15th Conf. Winter Simulation (1983) 2(IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ) 387–394Google Scholar
  • Gupta S. S., Miescke K. J. Bayesian look ahead one-stage sampling allocations for selection of the best population. J. Statist. Planning Inference (1996) 54(2):229–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoff P. D.A First Course in Bayesian Statistical Methods (2009) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inoue K., Chick S. E., Chen C. An empirical evaluation of several methods to select the best system. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simulation (TOMACS) (1999) 9(4):381–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S. H., Nelson B. L., Henderson S. G., Nelson B. L. Selecting the best system. Simulation (2006) 13(North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam) 501–534Handbooks in Operations Research and Management ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S. H., Nelson B. L. Recent advances in ranking and selection. Proc. 39th Conf. Winter Simulation (2007) (IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ) 162–172Google Scholar
  • Kulkarni V. G. Shortest paths in networks with exponentially distributed arc lengths. Networks (1986) 16(3):255–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Law A. M., Kelton W. D.Simulation Modeling and Analysis (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Lukacs E. A characterization of the normal distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. (1942) 13(1):91–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peer S. K., Sharma D. K. Finding the shortest path in stochastic networks. Comput. Math. Appl. (2007) 53(5):729–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryzhov I. O., Powell W. B. The knowledge gradient algorithm for online subset selection. Proc. 2009 IEEE Sympos. Adaptive Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learn. (2009) Nashville, TN:137–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryzhov I. O., Powell W. B., Frazier P. I. The knowledge gradient algorithm for a general class of online learning problems. (2011) . Submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  • Schmeiser B. Batch size effects in the analysis of simulation output. Oper. Res. (1982) 30(3):556–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder T. L., Steele J. M., Ball M., Magnanti T., Monma C. Probabilistic networks and network algorithms. Networks (1995) 7(North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam) 401–424Handbooks in Operations Research and Management ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watkins C. J. C. H., Dayan P. Q-Learning. Machine Learn. (1992) 8(3):279–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.