Do Firms Invest in Forecasting Efficiently? The Effect of Competition on Demand Forecast Investments and Supply Chain Coordination

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0876

References

  • Aiyer S., Ledesma G. Waste not, want not. Logist. Today (2004) April). Accessed November 2010, http://outsourced-logistics.comGoogle Scholar
  • Aviv Y. The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1326–1343LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D., Välimäki J. Information acquisition and efficient mechanism design. Econometrica (2002) 70(3):1007–1033CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Graves S., de Kok A. G. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination and Operations. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (2003) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Lariviere M. Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):629–646LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Lariviere M. Supply chain coordination with revenue sharing contracts. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):30–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Graves S., de Kok A. G. Information sharing and supply chain coordination. Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination and Operations. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (2003) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke E. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice (1971) 11(1):17–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cremer J., McLean R. Optimal selling strategies under uncertainty for a discriminating monopolist when demands are interdependent. Econometrica (1985) 53(2):345–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cremer J., McLean R. Full extraction of the surplus in Bayesian and dominant strategy auctions. Econometrica (1988) 56(6):1247–1258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta P., Maskin E. Efficient auctions. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(2):341–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demery P. Web-enabled systems help retailers better forecast demand. (2007) . Internet Retailer. Accessed November 2010, http://www.internetretailer.comGoogle Scholar
  • Ericson W. A. A note on the posterior mean of a population mean. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B (1969) 31(2):332–334Google Scholar
  • Faruqui A., Eakin K.Pricing in Competitive Electricity Markets (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M., Raman A. Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(1):87–99LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gal-Or E. Information sharing in oligopoly. Econometrica (1985) 53(2):329–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gal-Or E. Information transmission—Cournot and Bertrand equilibria. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1986) 53(1):85–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golombek R., Hoel M., Vislie J.Natural Gas Markets and Contracts (1987) (Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Green R. The electricity contract markets in England and Wales. J. Indust. Econom. (1999) 47(1):107–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groves T. Incentives in teams. Econometrica (1973) 41(4):617–631CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ha A. Y., Tong S. L. Contracting and information sharing under supply chain competition. Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):701–715LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ha A. Y., Tong S., Zhang H. Sharing imperfect demand information in competing supply chains with production diseconomies. Management Sci. (2011) . ForthcomingLinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoyt D., Lee H., Singh S. Rio Tinto iron ore: Challenges of globalization in the mining industry. (2007) . Case GS-56, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Jain A., Seshadri S., Sohoni M. A differential pricing mechanism for vertical information sharing under horizontal competition. Production Oper. Management (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Jehiel P., Moldovanu B. Efficient design with interdependent valuations. Econometrica (2001) 69(5):1237–1259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin J. A comment on “A general model of information sharing in oligopoly”. J. Econom. Theory (2000) 93(1):144–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer P. D., Meyer M. A. Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty. Econometrica (1989) 57(6):1243–1277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M. Inducing forecast revelation through restricted returns. (2002) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. L., Whang S. Information sharing in a supply chain. Internat. J. Manufacturing Tech. Management (2000) 1(1):79–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li L. Cournot oligopoly with information sharing. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(4):521–536CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li L. Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition. Management Sci. (2002) 48(9):1196–1212LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li L., Zhang H. Confidentiality and information sharing in supply chain coordination. Management Sci. (2008) 54(8):1467–1481LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li L., McKelvey R. D., Page T. Optimal research for Cournot oligopolists. J. Econom. Theory (1987) 42(1):140–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacAvoy P. W.The Natural Gas Market: Sixty Years of Regulation and Deregulation (2000) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Malvey P. F., Archibald C. M., Flynn S. T. Uniform-price auctions: Evaluation of the Treasury experience. U.S. Treasury report on experiments with uniform price auctions. (1997) . Accessed November 2010, http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/domestic-finance/debt-management/auctions-study/final.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Mendelson H., Tunca T. I. Strategic spot trading in supply chains. Management Sci. (2007) 53(5):742–759LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mezzetti C. Auction design with interdependent valuations: The generalized revelation principle, efficiency, full surplus extraction and information acquisition. (2002) . Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  • Nagali V., Hwang J., Sanghera D., Gaskins M., Pridgen M., Thurston T., Mackenroth P., Branvold D., Scholler P., Shoemaker G. Procurement risk management (PRM) at Hewlett-Packard Company. Interfaces (2008) 38(1):51–60LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Novshek W., Sonnenschein H. Fullfilled expectations Cournot duopoly with information acquisition and release. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(1):214–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obara I. The full surplus extraction theorem with hidden action. B.E.J. Theoret. Econom. (2008) 8(1, Advances). Article 8Google Scholar
  • O'Hara M.Market Microstructure Theory (1997) (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ozer O., Chen K., Zheng Y. Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Perry M., Reny P. J. An efficient auction. Econometrica (2002) 70(3):1199–1212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Priddle R.Natural Gas Pricing in Competitive Markets (1998) (International Energy Agency, OECD, Paris) Google Scholar
  • Raith M. A general model of information sharing in oligopoly. J. Econom. Theory (1996) 71(1):260–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rishi D. Demand forecasting in the apparel sector. (2006) . White paper, Wipro Technologies, Bangalore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R., Willig R.Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) I(Elsevier, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Schreibfeder J. Improving the accuracy of your forecasts. (2002) . Microsoft Business Solutions, http://www.masi.com/Portals/60905/docs/improving_forecast_accuracy.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C. Exchange of cost information in oligopoly. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1986) 53(3):433–446CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spengler J. Vertical integration and anti-trust policy. J. Political Econom. (1950) 58(4):347–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor T. A. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):992–1007LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor T. A., Xiao W. Incentives for retailer forecasting: Rebates vs. returns. Management Sci. (2009) 55(10):1654–1669LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch Z. J. R., Ho T. H., Cohen M. A. An empirical analysis of forecast sharing in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Sci. (2005) 51(2):208–220LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1990) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Tsay A. Quantity-flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1339–1358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vives X. Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand. J. Econom. Theory (1984) 34(1):71–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson R. Auctions of shares. Quart. J. Econom. (1979) 94(4):675–689CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson R. Architecture of power markets. Econometrica (2002) 70(4):1299–1340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K. Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):670–685LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ziv A. Information sharing in oligopoly: The truth-telling problem. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(3):455–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.