An Elasticity Approach to the Newsvendor with Price-Sensitive Demand

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0890

References

  • Agrawal V., Ferguson M. Bid-response models for customised pricing. J. Pricing Revenue Management (2007) 6(3):212–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal V., Seshadri S. Impact of uncertainty and risk aversion on price and order quantity in the newsvendor problem. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2:410–423LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bagnoli M., Bergstrom T. Logconcave probability and its applications. Econom. Theory (2005) 26(2):445–469CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barlow R. E., Proschan F., Golub G. H.Mathematical Theory of Reliability (1996) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) SIAM Classics in Applied MathematicsCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F., Federgruen A. A general equilibrium model for industries with price and service competition. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(6):868–886LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F., Federgruen A. Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):18–29LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chan L. M. A., Shen Z. J., Simchi-Levi D., Swann J. L., Simchi-Levi D., Wu S. D., Shen Z. J. Coordination of pricing and inventory decisions: A survey and classification. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 335–392CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen X., Simchi-Levi D. Coordinating inventory control and pricing strategies with random demand and fixed ordering cost: The finite horizon case. Oper. Res. (2003) 52(6):887–896LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Vericourt F., Lobo M. S. Resource and revenue management in nonprofit operations. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(5):1114–1128LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Federgruen A., Heching A. Combined pricing and inventory control under uncertainty. Oper. Res. (1999) 47(3):454–475LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ha A. Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation. Naval Res. Logist. (2001) 48(1):41–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanssens D., Parsons L., Schultz R.Market Response Models, Econometric and Times Series Analysis (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Karlin S., Carr C. R.Prices and Optimal Inventory Policy in Studies in Applied Probability and Management Science (1962) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
  • Kocabıyıkoğlu A., Popescu I., Stefanescu C. Pricing and revenue management: Coordinated vs. hierarchical approaches. (2009) . Working paper, INSEAD, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M. A note on probability distributions with increasing generalized failure rates. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(3):602–604LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M., Porteus E. L. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3(4):293–305LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lau H., Lau S. The newsvendor problem with price dependent demand distribution. IIE Trans. (1988) 20(2):168–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Q., Atkins D. On the effect of demand randomness on a price/quantity setting firm. IIE Trans. (2005) 37(12):1143–1153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mills E. S. Uncertainty and price theory. Quart. J. Econom. (1959) 73(1):116–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mills E. S.Price, Output and Inventory Policy (1962) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Monahan G. E., Petruzzi N. C., Zhao W. The dynamic pricing problem from a newsvendor's perspective. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2004) 6(1):73–91LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Müller A., Stoyan D.Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks (2002) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Netessine S. Dynamic pricing of inventory/capacity with infrequent price changes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006) 174(1):553–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Netessine S., Rudi N. Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(2):329–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nevins A. J. Some effects of uncertainty: Simulation of a model of price. Quart. J. Econom. (1966) 80:73–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petruzzi N. C., Dada M. Pricing and newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Oper. Res. (1999) 47(2):183–194LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips R. L.Pricing and Revenue Optimization (2005) (Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raz G., Porteus E. A fractiles perspective to the joint price/quantity newsvendor model. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1764–1777LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tayur S., Gareshan R., Magazine M.Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Topkis D. M.Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y., Jiang L., Shen Z.-J. Channel performance under consignment contract with revenue sharing. Management Sci. (2004) 50(1):34–47LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whitin T. M. Inventory control and price theory. Management Sci. (1955) 2(1):61–68LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yano C., Gilbert S. M., Eliashberg J., Chakravarty A. Coordinated pricing and production/procurement decisions: A review. Managing Business Interfaces: Marketing, Engineering, and Manufacturing Perspectives (2003) (Kluwer, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
  • Yao L., Chen Y. F., Yan H. The newsvendor problem with pricing. Internat. J. Management Sci. Engrg. Management (2006) 1(1):3–16Google Scholar
  • Young L. Price, inventory, and the structure of uncertain demand. New Zealand Oper. Res. J. (1978) 6(2):157–177Google Scholar
  • Zabel E. Monopoly and uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1970) 37(2):205–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zabel E. Multiperiod monopoly and uncertainty. J. Econom. Theory (1972) 5:524–536CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao X., Atkins D. R. Newsvendors under simultaneous price and inventory competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(3):539–546LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ziya S., Ayhan H., Foley D. Relationship among three assumptions in revenue management. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(5):804–809LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ziya S., Ayhan H., Foley D. Optimal prices for finite capacity queueing systems. Oper. Res. Lett. (2006) 34:214–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.