Fixed-Point Approaches to Computing Bertrand-Nash Equilibrium Prices Under Mixed-Logit Demand

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0894

References

  • Anderson S. P., de Palma A. Spatial price discrimination with heterogeneous products. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1988) 55(4):573–592CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson S. P., de Palma A. The logit as a model of product differentiation. Oxford Econom. Papers (1992) 44(1):51–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Austin D., Dinan T. Clearing the air: The costs and consequences of higher CAFE standards and increased gasoline taxes. J. Environ. Econom. Management (2005) 50:562–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baye M. R., Kovenock D., Durlaf S. N., Blume L. E. Bertrand competition. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2008) 2nd ed.(Palgrave Macmillian, London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bento A. M., Goulder L. M., Henry E., Jacobsen M. R., von Haefen R. H. Distributional and efficiency impacts of gasoline taxes: An econometrically based multi-market study. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(2):282–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beresteanu A., Li S. Gasoline prices, government support, and the demand for hybrid vehicles in the U.S.. (2008) . Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S., Reiss P., Armstrong M., Porter R. Empirical models of entry and market structure. Handbook of Industrial Organization (2007) 3(Elsevier, Amsterdam) . Chapter 29Google Scholar
  • Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):841–890CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Differentiated products demand systems from a combination of micro and macro data: The new car market. J. Political Econom. (2004) 112(1):68–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyd J. H., Mellman R. E. The effect of fuel economy standards on the U.S. automotive market: An hedonic demand analysis. Transportation Res. A (1980) 14A:367–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T. F., Reiss P. C. Empirical models of discrete games. J. Econometrics (1991a) 48(1–2):57–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T. F., Reiss P. C. Entry and competition in concentrated markets. J. Political Econom. (1991b) 99(5):977–1009CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown P. N., Saad Y. Hybrid Krylov methods for nonlinear systems of equations. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. (1990) 11(3):450–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer price index. (2009) . Accessed April 24, 2009, http://www.bls.gov/cpi/Google Scholar
  • Cai X.-C., Keyes D. E. Nonlinearly preconditioned inexact Newton algorithms. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. (2002) 24(1):183–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caplin A., Nalebuff B. Aggregation and imperfect competition: On the existence of equilibrium. Econometrica (1991) 59(1):25–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • CBO The economic costs of fuel economy standards versus a gasoline tax. (2003) . Technical report, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Choi S. C., Desarbo W. S., Harker P. T. Product positioning under price competition. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):175–199LinkGoogle Scholar
  • CPS Current population survey. (2007) . Accessed December 31, 2007, http://www.census.gov/cps/Google Scholar
  • Dennis J. E., Schnabel R. B.Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations (1996) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doraszelski U., Draganska M. Market segmentation strategies of multiproduct firms. J. Indust. Econom. (2006) 54(1):125–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Draganska M., Jain D. A likelihood approach to estimating market equilibrium models. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):605–616LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dube J.-P., Fox J. T., Su C.-L. Improving the performance of BLP static and dynamic discrete choice random coefficients demand estimation. (2011) . Working paper, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  • Dube J.-P., Chintagunta P., Petrin A., Bronnenberg B., Goettler R., Seetharaman P. B., Sudhir K., Thomadsen R., Zhao Y. Structural applications of the discrete choice model. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):207–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenstat S. C., Walker H. F. Globally convergent inexact Newton methods. SIAM J. Optim. (1994) 4(2):393–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenstat S. C., Walker H. F. Choosing the forcing terms in an inexact Newton method. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. (1996) 17(1):16–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris M. C., Pang J.-S. Engineering and economic applications of complementarity problems. SIAM Rev. (1997) 39(4):669–713CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg P. K. Product differentiation and oligopoly in international markets: The case of the U.S. automobile industry. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):891–951CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg P. K. The effects of the corporate average fuel efficiency standards in the U.S.. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(1):1–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golub G. H., Van Loan C. F.Matrix Computations (1996) (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore) Google Scholar
  • Goolsbee A., Petrin A. The consumer gains from direct broadcast satellites and the competition with cable TV. Econometrica (2004) 72(2):351–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halcrow J., Gibson J. F., Cvitanovic P., Viswanath D. Heteroclinic connections in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mechanics (2009) 611:365–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanson W., Martin K. Optimizing multinomial logit profit functions. Management Sci. (1996) 42(7):992–1003LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harker P. T., Pang J.-S. Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: A survey of theory, algorithms, and applications. Math. Programming (1990) 48(1–3):161–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobsen M. R. Evaluating U.S. fuel economy standards in a model with producer and household heterogeneity. (2006) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Judd K. L.Numerical Methods in Economics (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kelley C. T.Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations, Frontiers in Applied Mathematics (1995) 16(Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelley C. T.Solving Nonlinear Equations with Newton's Method (2003) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) Fundamentals of AlgorithmsCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knittel C. R., Metaxoglou K. Estimation of random coefficient demand models: Challenges, difficulties, and warnings. (2008) . Working paper, University of California, Davis, DavisCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levenberg K. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quart. J. Appl. Math. (1944) 2:164–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquardt D. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1963) 11(2):431–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D. L. A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica (1989) 57(5):995–1026CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D., Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econometrics (2000) 15(5):447–470CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michalek J. J., Papalambros P. Y., Skerlos S. J. A study of fuel efficiency and emission policy impact on optimal vehicle design decisions. J. Mech. Design (2004) 126(6):1062–1070CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica (1990) 58(6):1255–1277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrow W. R. A fixed-point approach to equilibrium pricing in differentiated product markets. (2008) . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  • Morrow W. R., Skerlos S. J. Fixed-point approaches to computing Bertrand-Nash equilibrium prices under mixed-logit demand: A framework for analysis and efficient computational methods. (2010) . Technical report, Iowa State University, AmesGoogle Scholar
  • Nevo A. Mergers with differentiated products: The case of the ready-to-eat cereal industry. (1997) . Technical report, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  • Nevo A. Mergers with differentiated products: The case of the ready-to-eat cereal industry. RAND J. Econom. (2000a) 31(3):395–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nevo A. A practitioner's guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demand. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2000b) 9(4):513–548CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nocedal J., Wright S. J.Numerical Optimization (2006) 2nd ed.(Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ortega J. M., Rheinboldt W. C.Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables (1970) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
  • Pawlowski R. P., Shadid J. N., Simonis J. P., Walker H. F. Globalization techniques for Newton-Krylov methods and applications to the fully coupled solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM Rev. (2006) 48(4):700–721CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pawlowski R. P., Simonis J. P., Walker H. F., Shadid J. N. Inexact Newton dogleg methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. (2008) 46(4):2112–2132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pernice M., Walker H. F. NITSOL: A Newton iterative solver for nonlinear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. (1998) 19(1):302–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petrin A. Quantifying the benefits of new products: The case of the minivan. J. Political Econom. (2002) 110(4):705–729CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell M. J. D., Rabinowitz P. A hybrid method for nonlinear equations. Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Algebraic Equations (1970) (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York) 87–114Chapter 6Google Scholar
  • Schmedders K., Durlaf S. N., Blume L. E. Numerical optimization methods in economics. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2008) 2nd ed.(Palgrave Macmillian, London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith H. Supermarket choice and supermarket competition in market equilibrium. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2004) 71:235–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Su C.-L., Judd K. L. Constrained optimization approaches to estimation of structural models. (2008) . Working paper, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  • Thomadsen R. The effect of ownership structure on prices in geographically differentiated markets. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(4):908–929Google Scholar
  • Train K.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trefethen L. N., Bau D.Numerical Linear Algebra (1997) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuminaro R. S., Walker H. F., Shadid J. N. On backtracking failure in Newton-GMRES methods with a demonstration for the Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. (2002) 180(2):549–558CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viswanath D. Recurrent motions within plane Couette turbulence. J. Fluid Mechanics (2007) 580:339–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viswanath D. The critical layer in pipe flow at high Reynolds number. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. (2009) 367:561–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viswanath D., Cvitanovic P. Stable manifolds and the transition to turbulence in pipe flow. J. Fluid Mechanics (2009) 627:215–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • WardsWards Automotive Yearbooks (2004–2007) (Wards Reports Inc., Southfield, MI) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.