Bullwhip Effect Measurement and Its Implications

References

• Allen DS. Do inventories moderate fluctuations in output? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Rev. (1997) 79(4):39–50Google Scholar
• Aviv Y. The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1326–1343Link, Google Scholar
• Aviv Y. A time-series framework for supply chain inventory management. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(2):210–227Link, Google Scholar
• Aviv Y. On the benefits of collaborative forecasting partnerships between retailers and manufacturers. Management Sci. (2007) 53(5):777–794Link, Google Scholar
• Aviv Y, Federgruen A. Stochastic inventory models with limited production capacities and varying parameters. Probab. Engrg. Informational Sci. (1997) 11:107–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baganha M, Cohen M. The stabilizing effect of distribution center inventory. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(3):S72–S83Link, Google Scholar
• Blanchard OJ. The production and inventory behavior of the American automobile industry. J. Political Econom. (1983) 91(3):365–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blinder AS. Retail inventory behavior and business fluctuations. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1981) 2:443–520Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blinder AS. Can the production smoothing model of inventory behavior be saved? Quart. J. Econom. (1986) 101(3):431–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bray RL, Mendelson H. Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. (2012) 58(5):860–875Link, Google Scholar
• Browne S, Zipkin P. Inventory models with continuous, stochastic demands. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1991) 1(3):419–435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon G. Managing supply chain demand variability with scheduled ordering policies. Management Sci. (1999) 45(6):843–856Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G, Randall T, Schmidt G. In search of the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(4):457–479Link, Google Scholar
• Cantor D, Katok E. Production smoothing in a serial supply chain: A laboratory investigation. Transportation Res. Part E. (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Caplin AS. The variability of aggregate demand with (S, s) inventory policies. Econometrica (1985) 53:1395–1409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Lee HL. Information sharing and order variability control under a generalized demand model. Management Sci. (2009) 55(5):781–797Link, Google Scholar
• Chen YF, Feng Y, Simchi-Levi D. Uniform distribution of inventory positions in two-echelon periodic review systems with batch-ordering policies and interdependent demands. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 40(3):648–654Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen YF, Ryan JK, Simchi-Levi D. The impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect. Naval Res. Logist. (2000b) 47(4):269–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen YF, Drezner Z, Ryan JK, Simchi-Levi D. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Sci. (2000a) 46(3):436–443Link, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K. Behaviorial causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. (2006) 52(3):323–336Link, Google Scholar
• De Kok T, Janssen F, van Doremalen J, van Wachem E, Clerkx M, Peeters W. Philips Electronics synchronizes its supply chain to end the bullwhip effect. Interfaces (2005) 35(1):37–48Link, Google Scholar
• Erkip N, Hausman WH, Nahmias S. Optimal centralized ordering policies in multi-echelon inventory systems with correlated demands. Management Sci. (1990) 36(3):381–392Link, Google Scholar
• Fair RC. The production-smoothing model is alive and well. J. Monetary Econom. (1989) 24:353–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feller W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (1971) II2nd ed.(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Florian M, Klein M. Deterministic production planning with concave costs and capacity constraints. Management Sci. (1971) 18(1):12–20Link, Google Scholar
• Fransoo JC, Wouters MJF. Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management (2000) 5(2):78–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Scheller-Wolf A. Capacitated inventory problems with fixed order costs: Some optimal policy structure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2000) 126(3):603–613Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghali MA. Seasonality, aggregation, and the testing of the production smoothing hypothesis. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(3):464–469Google Scholar
• Hammond J. Barilla SpA (a). (1994) . Harvard Business School, Case No. 9-694-046, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Holt CC, Modigliani F, Shelton JP. The transmission of demand fluctuations through a distribution and production system, the TV-set industry. Canadian J. Econom. (1968) 1(4):718–739Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn JA. Inventories and the volatility of production. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(4):667–679Google Scholar
• Kahn JA. Why is production more valuable than sales? Theory and evidence on the stockout-avoidance motive for inventory-holding. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(2):481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapuściński R, Tayur S. A capacitated production-inventory model with periodic demand. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(6):899–911Link, Google Scholar
• Lai RK. Bullwhip in a Spanish shop. (2005) . Harvard NOM Working Paper 06-06, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997a) 43(4):546–558Link, Google Scholar
• Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Rev. (1997b) 38(4):93–102Google Scholar
• Lee HL, So KC, Tang CS. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):626–643Link, Google Scholar
• Miron JA, Zeldes SP. Seasonality, cost shocks, and the production smoothing model of inventories. Econometrica (1988) 56(4):877–908Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mosser PC. Trade inventories and (S,s). Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106(4):1267–1286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porteus E. Foundations of Stochastic Inventory Theory (2002) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards FR. Comments on the distribution of inventory position in a continuous review (s,S) inventory system. Oper. Res. (1975) 27(2):366–371Link, Google Scholar
• Shaoxiang C. The infinite horizon periodic review problem with setup cost and capacity constraints: A partial characterization of the optimal policy. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(3):409–421Link, Google Scholar
• Shaoxiang C, Lambrecht M. X−Y band and modified (s, S) policy. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(6):1013–1019Link, Google Scholar
• Simon RM. The uniform distribution of inventory position for continuous review (s, Q) policies. (1968) . Rand Corporation Paper P3938, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
• Sobel M. Production smoothing with stochastic demand I: Finite horizon case. Management Sci. (1969) 16(3):195–207Link, Google Scholar
• Steckel J, Gupta S, Banerji A. Supply chain decision making: Will shorter cycle times and shared point-of-sale information necessarily help? Management Sci. (2004) 52(4):458–464Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman JD. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):321–339Link, Google Scholar
• van Donselaar KH, Gaur V, van Woensel T, Broekmeulen RACM, Fransoo JC. Ordering behavior in retail stores and implications for automated replenishment. Management Sci. (2010) 56(5):766–784Link, Google Scholar
• Waller MA, Williams BD, Eroglu C. Hidden effects of variable order review intervals in inventory control. Internat. J. Physical Distribution Logist. Management (2008) 38(3):244–258Crossref, Google Scholar