Probabilistic Set Covering with Correlations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1120.1135

References

  • Agrawal S, Ding Y, Saberi A, Ye Y. Price of correlations in stochastic optimization. Oper. Res. (2012) 60(1):150–162LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmed S, Atamtürk A. Maximizing a class of submodular utility functions. Math. Programming (2011) 128(1–2):149–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A, Narayanan V. Polymatroids and mean-risk minimization in discrete optimization. Oper. Res. Lett. (2008) 36(5):618–622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A. Robust Optimization (2009) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beraldi P, Bruni ME. An exact approach for solving integer problems under probabilistic constraints with random technology matrix. Ann. Oper. Res. (2010) 177:127–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beraldi P, Ruszczyński A. The probabilistic set-covering problem. Oper. Res. (2002) 50(6):956–967LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Calafiore G, Campi MC. Uncertain convex programs: Randomized solutions and confidence levels. Math. Programming (2005) 102:25–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmonds J. Combinatorial Structures and Their Applications (1971) (Gordon and Breach, New York) Google Scholar
  • Erdogan E, Iyengar G. Ambiguous chance constrained problems and robust optimization. Math. Programming (2006) 107(1):37–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischetti M, Monaci M. Cutting plane versus compact formulations for uncertain (integer) linear programs. Math. Programming Comput. (2012) 4(3):239–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goemans M, Vondrák J, Corea J, Hevla A, Kiwi M. Stochastic covering and adaptivity. Proc. 7th Latin Amer. Conf. Theoret. Informatics (2006) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 532–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haight RG, Revelle CS, Snyder SA. An integer optimization approach to a probabilistic reserve site selection problem. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(5):697–708LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kleywegt AJ, Shapiro A, Homem-de Mello T. The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM J. Optim. (2002) 12(2):479–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuai H, Alajaji F, Takahara G. A lower bound on the probability of a finite union of events. Discrete Math. (2000) 215(1–3):147–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luedtke J, Ahmed S. A sample approximation approach for optimization with probabilistic constraints. SIAM J. Optim. (2008) 19(2):674–699CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemirovski A, Shapiro A. Convex approximations of chance constrained programs. SIAM J. Optim. (2006a) 17(4):969–996CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemirovski A, Shapiro A, Calafiore G, Dabbene F. Scenario approximations of chance constraints. Probabilistic and Randomized Methods for Design Under Uncertainty (2006b) (Springer, London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pintér J. Deterministic approximations of probability inequalities. Math. Methods Oper. Res. (1989) 33(4):219–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prékopa A. Stochastic Programming (1995) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prékopa A, Gao L. Bounding the probability of the union of events by aggregation and disaggregation in linear programs. Discrete Appl. Math. (2005) 145(3):444–454CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxena A, Goyal V, Lejeune MA. MIP reformulations of the probabilistic set covering problem. Math. Programming (2010) 121(1):1–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A. Lectures on Stochastic Programming (2009) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Topkis DM. Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.