OR Forum—Blotto Politics

References

• Ahuja A, Magnanti T, Orin B. Network Flows (1993) (Prentice Hall, New York) . Appendix BGoogle Scholar
• Anderson G, Tollison R, Crain W, Tollison R. Democracy in the marketplace. Predicting Politics (1990) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor) 285–303Google Scholar
• Beale E, Heselden G. An approximate method of solving Blotto games. Naval Res. Logist. (1962) 9:65–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borel E. La theorie du jeu les equations integrales a noyau symetrique Comptes Rendus de l'Academie 173. English translation by L. Savage (1953) The theory of play and integral equations with skew symmetric kernels. Econometrica (1921) 21:97–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brams S, Davis M. The 3/2's rule in presidential campaigning. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1974) 68:155–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekel E, Jackson M, Wolinsky A. Vote buying: General elections. J. Political Econom. (2008) 116:351–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckler A, Burr S. Mathematical Models of Target Coverage and Missile Allocation (1972) (Military Operations Research Society, Alexandria, VA) . Chap. 4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Everett H. Generalized Lagrange multiplier method for solving problems of optimal allocation of resources. Oper. Res. (1963) 11(3):399–417Link, Google Scholar
• FEC Federal Election Commission. (2012) . Accessed May 2012, http://www.fec.govGoogle Scholar
• Galiano R. A simple analytic model for preallocated defense. (1969) . Lambda Paper 30, Lambda Corporation, Lake Orion, MIGoogle Scholar
• Gross O, Wagner R. A continuous Colonel Blotto game. (1950) . RAND Corporation RM-408, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
• Hart S. Discrete Colonel Blotto and general lotto games. Internat. J. Game Theory (2008) 36:441–460Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hortala-Vallve R, Llorente-Saguer A. Pure strategy Nash equilibria in non-zero sum Colonel Blotto games. Internat. J. Game Theory (2011) 41:331–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaacs R. Differential Games (1965) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Kvasov D. Contests with limited resources. J. Econom. Theory (2007) 136:738–748Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laslier J. How two-party competition treats minorities. Rev. Econom. Design (2002) 7:297–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laslier J, Picard N. Distributive politics and electoral competition. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 103:106–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt S. Using repeat challengers to estimate the effect of campaign spending on election outcomes in the U.S. House. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102:777–798Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merolla J, Munger M, Tofias M. In play: A commentary on strategies in the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Public Choice (2005) 123:19–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson R. Incentives to cultivate favored minorities under alternative electoral systems. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1993) 87:856–869Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen G, Lindner I, Grofman B, Braham M, Steffen F. Modified power indices for indirect voting. Power, Freedom, and Voting (2008) (Springer, New York) 119–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penn A. A generalized Lagrange-multiplier method for constrained matrix games. Oper. Res. (1971) 19(4):933–945Link, Google Scholar
• Phillips H. The Week-End Problems Book (1933) (Nonesuch Press, London) 39–40Google Scholar
• Roberson B. The Colonel Blotto game. Econom. Theory (2006) 29:1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder J. Election goals and the allocation of campaign resources. Econometrica (1989) 57:637–660Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tukey J. A problem of strategy. Econometrica (1949) 17:73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Washburn A. Two-Person Zero-Sum Games (2003) (INFORMS, Hanover, MD) . Chap. 6Google Scholar