Enhancing Stochastic Kriging Metamodels with Gradient Estimators

References

• Ankenman BE, Nelson BL, Staum J. Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(2):371–382Link, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ankenman B, Nelson BL, Johansson B, Jain S, Montoya-Torres J, Hugan J, Yucesan E. Common random numbers and stochastic kriging. Proc. 2010 Winter Simulation Conf. (2010) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 947–956Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ankenman B, Nelson BL. The effects of common random numbers on stochastic kriging metamodels. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simulation (2012) 22:7/1–7/20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forrester AIJ, Keaney AJ. Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Progress in Aerospace Sci. (2009) 45:50–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu MC, Henderson SG, Nelson BL. Stochastic gradient estimation. Elsevier Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation (2006) (Elsevier, New York) 575–616Google Scholar
• Glasserman P. Gradient Estimation via Perturbation Analysis (1991) (Kluwer, Boston) Google Scholar
• Glasserman P. Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (2004) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidergott B, Vázquez-Abad FJ, Pflug F, Farenhorst-Yuan T. Gradient estimation for discrete-event systems by measure-valued differentiation. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simulation (2010) 20:5/1–5/28Crossref, Google Scholar
• L'Ecuyer P. A unified view of the IPA, SF, and LR gradient estimation techniques. Management Sci. (1990) 36(11):1364–1383Link, Google Scholar
• Mitchell T, Morris M, Ylvisaker D. Asymptotically optimum experimental designs for prediction of deterministic functions given derivative information. J. Statist. Planning and Inference (1994) 41:377–389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris MD, Mitchell TJ, Ylvisaker D. Bayesian design and analysis of computer experiments: Use of derivatives in surface prediction. Technometrics (1993) 35:243–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Näther W, Šimák J. Effective observation of random processes using derivatives. Metrika (2003) 58:71–84Google Scholar
• Parzen E. Stochastic Processes (1962) (Holden-Day, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Rubinstein RY, Shapiro A. Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic Optimization by the Score Function Method (1993) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci. (1989) 4:409–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz WI. The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (2003) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siem AYD. Property preservation and quality measures in meta-models. (2008) . Open access publications, Tilburg University urn:nbn:nl:ui: 12-364657. Tilburg University, Tilburg, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Šimák J. On experimental designs for derivative random fields. (2002) . Ph.D. thesis. TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Spall J. Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization: Estimation, Simulation, and Control (2003) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein ML. Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging (1999) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephenson G. Using derivative information in the statistical analysis of computer models. (2010) . Ph.D. thesis. School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southhampton UKGoogle Scholar
• Suri R, Leung YT, Thesen A, Grant H, Kelton WD. Single run optimization of a SIMAN model for closed loop flexible systems. Proc. 1987 Winter Simulation Conf. (1987) (ACM, New York) 738–748Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamazaki W, Rumpfkeil MP, Mavriplis DJ. Design optimization utilizing gradient/Hessian enhanced surrogate model. AIAA Paper 2010-4363, 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit (2010) Chicago, ILCrossref, Google Scholar