Dynamic Business Share Allocation in a Supply Chain with Competing Suppliers

References

• Abreu D, Pearce D, Stacchetti E. Optimal cartel equilibria with imperfect monitoring. J. Econom. Theory (1986) 39(1):251–269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abreu D, Pearce D, Stacchetti E. Toward a theory of discounted repeated games with imperfect monitoring. Econometrica (1990) 58(5):1041–1063Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anton J, Yao D. Split awards, procurement, and innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1989) 20(4):538–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baiman S, Fischer P, Rajan M. Performance measurement and design in supply chains. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):173–188Link, Google Scholar
• Belavina E, Girotra K. The relational advantages of intermediation. Management Sci. (2012) 58(9):1614–1631Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Elahi E, Donohue K. Outsourcing via service competition. Management Sci. (2007) 53(2):241–259Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Dewatripont M. Contract Theory (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Cachon G, Zhang F. Obtaining fast service in a queuing system via performance-based allocation of demand. Management Sci. (2007) 53(3):408–420Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Seshadri S, Sohoni M. Optimal design of sales contracts under information asymmetry. (2011) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Corbett C, DeCroix G, Ha A. Optimal shared savings contracts in supply chains: Linear contract and double moral hazard. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 163:653–667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta S. Adapting decisions, optimizing facts and predicting figures. RFID J. (2003) 11:21–22Google Scholar
• Doepke M, Townsend RM. Dynamic mechanism design with hidden income and hidden actions. J. Econom. Theory (2006) 126:235–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy R. Supply base rationalization. (2005) . CAPS Research, Critical Issues Report, CAPS Research, Tempe, AZ, http://www.capsresearch.orgGoogle Scholar
• Farlow D, Schmidt G, Tsay AA. Supplier management at Sun Microsystems. (1996) . Case Study A, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Friedman J. A non-cooperative equilibrium for supergames. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1971) 38(113):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Fuloria P, Zenios S. Outcomes-adjusted reimbursement in a health-care delivery system. Management Sci. (2001) 47(6):735–751Link, Google Scholar
• Giunipero L. Motivating and monitoring JIT supplier performance. J. Purchasing Materials Management (1990) 26(3):19–24Google Scholar
• Gritzmann P, Sturmfels B. Minkowski addition of polytopes: Computational complexity and applications to Grobner bases. SIAM J. Discrete Math. (1993) 6(2):246–269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B. Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(2):324–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd KL, Yeltekin S, Conklin J. Computing supergame equilibria. Econometrica (2003) 71:1239–1254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaya M, Özer Ö. Quality risk in outsourcing: Noncontractible product quality and private quality cost information. Naval Res. Logist. (2009) 56(1):669–685Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Cohen M, Netessine S. Performance contracting in after-sales service supply chains. Management Sci. (2007) 53(12):1843–1858Link, Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Cohen MA, Netessine S, Veeraraghavan S. Contracting for infrequent restoration and recovery of mission-critical systems. Management Sci. (2010) 56(9):1551–1567Link, Google Scholar
• Klotz D, Chatterjee K. Dual sourcing in repeated procurement competitions. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1317–1327Link, Google Scholar
• Krause D, Scannell T, Calantone R. A structural analysis of the effectiveness of buying firms' strategies to improve supplier performance. Decision Sci. (2000) 31(1):33–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J, Martimort D. The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin J. Relational incentive contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(3):835–857Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C, Debo L. Second sourcing versus sole sourcing with capacity investment and asymmetric information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009a) 11(3):448–470Link, Google Scholar
• Li C, Debo L. Strategic dynamic sourcing from competing suppliers with transferable capacity investment. Naval Res. Logist. (2009b) 56(6):540–562Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu L, Lariviere M. Capacity allocation over a long horizon: The return on turn-and-earn. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2012) 14(1):24–41Link, Google Scholar
• O'Grady J. 2011 MacBook air shipping with (fast) Samsung and (slow) Toshiba SSDs. (2011) . http://www.zdnet.com/blog/apple/2011-macbook-air-shipping-with-fast-samsung-and-slow-toshiba-ssds/10701Google Scholar
• Oh S, Özer Ö. Mechanism design for capacity planning under dynamic evolutions of asymmetric demand forecasts. Management Sci. (2013) 59(4):987–1007Link, Google Scholar
• Phelan C, Stacchetti E. Subgame-perfect equilibria in a Ramsey tax model. Econometrica (2001) 69:1491–1518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL, Taylor TA. Partnership in a dynamic production system with unobservable actions and noncontractible output. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1509–1527Link, Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL, Zenios SA. Performance-based incentives in a dynamic principal-agent model. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(3):240–263Link, Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL, Zenios SA. Incentive efficient control of a make-to-stock production system. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(3):371–386Link, Google Scholar
• Porteus E, Whang S. On manufacturing/marketing incentives. Management Sci. (1991) 37(9):1166–1181Link, Google Scholar
• Radner R. Repeated principal-agent games with discounting. Econometrica (1985) 53(5):1173–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren ZJ, Cohen M, Ho T, Terwiesch C. Information sharing in a long-term supply chain relationship: The role of customer review strategy. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(1):81–93Link, Google Scholar
• Sabel C, O'Rourke D, Fung A. Ratcheting labor standards: Regulation for continuous improvement in the global workplace. (2000) . KSG Working Paper 00-010. http://ssrn.com/abstract=262178Google Scholar
• Seshadri S. Bidding for contests. Management Sci. (1995) 41(4):561–576Link, Google Scholar
• Shimpi AL, Klug B. Apple iPhone 4S: Thoroughly reviewed. The memory interface. (2011) . http://www.anandtech.com/show/4971/apple-iphone-4s-review-att-verizon/5Google Scholar
• Spear S, Srivastava S. On repeated moral hazard with discounting. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1987) LIV:599–717Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swinney R, Netessine S. Long-term contracts under the threat of supplier default. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(1):109–127Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Plambeck EL. Simple relational contracts to motivate capacity investment: Price only vs. price and quantity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007a) 9(1):94–113Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Plambeck EL. Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. Management Sci. (2007b) 53(10):1577–1593Link, Google Scholar
• Tezuka H. Success as the source of failure? Competition and cooperation in the Japanese economy. Sloan Management Rev. (1997) 38(2):83–93Google Scholar
• Whitney L. Next-gen iPhone, iPad could deliver 20 times the graphics power. (2012) . Accessed March 2013, http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57357766-37/next-gen-iphone-ipad-could-deliver-20-times-the-graphics-power/Google Scholar
• Zhang H. Partially observable Markov decision processes: A geometric technique and analysis. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(1):214–228Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Nagarajan M, Sosic G. Dynamic supplier contracts under asymmetric inventory information. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(5):1380–1397Link, Google Scholar