Optimal Cardinality Constrained Portfolio Selection

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2013.1170

References

  • Bertsimas D, Shioda R. Algorithm for cardinality-constrained quadratic optimization. Comput. Optim. Appl. (2009) 43(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bienstock D. Computational study of family of mixed-integer quadratic programming problems. Math. Programming (1996) 74(2):121–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blog B, van der Hoek G, Rinnooy Kan A, Timmer GT. The optimal selection of small portfolios. Management Sci. (1983) 29(7):792–798LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bonami P, Lejeune MA. An exact solution approach for portfolio optimization problems under stochastic and integer constraints. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(3):650–670LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chang TJ, Beasley JE, Sharaiha YM. Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization. Comput. Oper. Res. (2000) 27(13):1271–1302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiu MC, Li D. Asset and liability management under a continuous-time mean-variance optimization framework. Insurance Math. Econom. (2006) 39(3):330–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Costa OLV, Paiva AC. Robust portfolio selection using linear matrix inequality. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2002) 26(6):889–909CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeMiguel V, Nogales FJ. Portfolio selection with robust estimation. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(3):560–577LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeMiguel V, Garlappi L, Uppal R. Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Rev. Financial Stud. (2007) 22(5):1915–1953CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao JJ, Li D. Cardinality constrained linear-quadratic optimal control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control (2011) 56(8):1936–1941CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao JJ, Li D. A polynomial case of cardinality constrained quadratic optimization. J. Global Optim. (2013) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb D, Iyengar G. Robust portfolio selection problems. Math. Oper. Res. (2003) 28(1):1–38LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Günlük O, Lee J, Weismantel R. MINLP strengthening for separable convex quadratic transportation-cost UFL. (2007) . IBM Research Report RC24213, IBM Research Division, T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NYGoogle Scholar
  • IBMUser's Manual for CPLEX (2011) . IBM ILOG CPLEX 12.3. http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/cosinfoc/v12r3/index.jspGoogle Scholar
  • Jagannathan R, Ma T. Risk reduction in large portfolios: Why imposing the wrong constraints helps. J. Finance (2003) 58(4):1651–1684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ledoit O, Wolf M. Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection. J. Empirical Finance (2003) 10(5):603–621CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li D, Ng WL. Optimal dynamic portfolio selection: Multiperiod mean-variance formulation. Math. Finance (2000) 10(3):387–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li D, Sun XL. Nonlinear Integer Programming (2006) (Springer, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Li D, Sun XL, Wang J. Optimal lot solution to cardinality constrained mean-variance formulation for portfolio selection. Math. Finance (2006) 16(1):83–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markowitz HM. Portfolio selection. J. Finance (1952) 7(1):77–91Google Scholar
  • Markowitz HM. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment (1959) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • MOSEKMOSEK User Manual (2012) (Optimization Software, Copenhagen) Google Scholar
  • Ogryczak W, Tamir A. Minimizing the sum of the k largest functions in linear time. Inform. Process. Lett. (2003) 85(3):117–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharpe WF. Investors and Markets: Portfolio Choice, Asset Prices, and Investment Advice (2007) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Shaw DX, Liu S, Kopman L. Lagrangian relaxation procedure for cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization. Optim. Methods Software (2008) 23(3):411–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vandenberghe L, Boyd S. Semidefinite programming. SIAM Rev. (1996) 38(1):49–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xie J, He S, Zhang S. Randomized portfolio selection with constraints. Pacific J. Optim. (2008) 4:89–112Google Scholar
  • Yamashita M, Fujisawa K, Kojima M. Implementation and evaluation of SDPA 6.0 (semidefinite programming algorithm 6.0.). Optim. Methods Software (2003) 18(4):491–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou XY, Li D. Continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection: A stochastic LQ framework. Appl. Math. Optim. (2000) 42(1):19–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.