Joint Optimization of Sampling and Control of Partially Observable Failing Systems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2013.1171

References

  • Anderson RF, Friedman A. Optimal inspection in a stochastic control problem with costly observations II. Math. Oper. Res. (1978) 3:67–81LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aven T, Bergman B. Optimal replacement times—A general set-up. J. Appl. Probab. (1986) 23:432–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Badia FG, Berrade MD, Campos CA. Optimization of inspection intervals based on cost. J. Appl. Probab. (2001) 38:872–881CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barlow RE, Hunter LC. Optimum preventive maintenance policies. Oper. Res. (1960) 8:90–100LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barlow RE, Hunter LC, Proschan F. Optimum checking procedures. J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. (1963) 11:1078–1095CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas DP, Shreve SE. Stochastic Optimal Control: The Discrete Time Case (1978) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Billingsley P. Probability and Measure (1995) (Wiley-Interscience, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dayanik S, Gurler U. An adaptive Bayesian replacement policy with minimal repair. Oper. Res. (2002) 50:552–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dieulle L, Berenguer C, Grall A, Roussignol M. Sequential condition-based maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 150:451–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dogramaci A, Fraiman NM. Replacement decisions with maintenance under uncertainty: An imbedded optimal control model. Oper. Res. (2004) 52:785–794LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eckles JE. Optimum maintenance with incomplete information. Oper. Res. (1976) 16:1058–1067LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrenfeld S. On a sequential Markovian decision procedure with incomplete information. Comput. Oper. Res. (1976) 3:39–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grimmett GR, Stirzaker DR. Probability and Random Processes (2001) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heidergott B, Farenhorst-Yuan T. Gradient estimation for multicomponent maintenance systems with age-replacement policy. Oper. Res. (2010) 58:706–718LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech. Systems Signal Processing (2006) 20:1483–1510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang R. Optimization of alarm threshold and sequential inspection scheme. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (2010) 95:208–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Juang M, Anderson G. A Bayesian method on adaptive preventive maintenance problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2004) 155:455–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kander Z. Inspection policies for deteriorating equipment characterized by N quality levels. Naval Res. Logist. (1978) 25:243–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim MJ, Jiang R, Makis V, Lee CG. Optimal Bayesian fault detection scheme for a partially observable system subject to random failure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2011) 224:331–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuo Y. Optimal adaptive control policy for joint machine maintenance and product quality control. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006) 171:586–597CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurt M, Kharoufeh JP. Optimally maintaining a Markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2010) 205:368–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lam CT, Yeh RH. Comparison of sequential and continuous inspection strategies for deteriorating systems. Adv. Appl. Probab. (1994) 26:423–435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy WS. On the convexity of policy regions in partially observed systems. Oper. Res. (1987) 35:619–621LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maillart LM. Maintenance policies for systems with condition monitoring and obvious failures. IIE Trans. (2006) 38:463–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Makis V. Multivariate Bayesian control chart. Oper. Res. (2008) 56:487–496LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Makis V, Jiang X. Optimal replacement under partial observations. Math. Oper. Res. (2003) 28:382–394LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Makis V, Wu J, Gao Y. An application of DPCA to oil data for CBM modeling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006) 174:112–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakagawa T. Periodic inspection policy with preventive maintenance. Naval Res. Logist. (1984) 31:33–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ohnishi M, Kawai H, Mine H. An optimal inspection and replacement policy for a deteriorating system. J. Appl. Probab. (1986) 23:973–988CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozekici S, Pliska SR. Optimal scheduling of inspections: A delayed Markov model with false positives and negatives. Oper. Res. (1991) 39:261–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Papadimitriou CH. Computational Complexity (1995) (Addison Wesley, San Diego) Google Scholar
  • Parmigiani G. Optimal scheduling of fallible inspections. Oper. Res. (1996) 44:360–367LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenfield D. Markovian deterioration with uncertain information. Oper. Res. (1976) 24:141–155LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ross SM. Quality control under Markovian deterioration. Management Sci. (1971) 17:587–596LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schervish MJ. Theory of Statistics (1995) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smallwood RD, Sondik EJ. The optimal control of partially observable Markov processes over a finite horizon. Oper. Res. (1973) 21:1071–1088LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tagaras G, Nikolaidis Y. Comparing the effectiveness of various Bayesian X control charts. Oper. Res. (2002) 50:878–888LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang L, Chu J, Mao W. A condition-based replacement and spare provisioning policy for deteriorating systems with uncertain deterioration to failure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2009) 194:184–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White CC. Optimal inspection and repair of a production process subject to deterioration. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1978) 29:235–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang M, Makis V. ARX model-based gearbox fault detection and localization under varying load conditions. J. Sound Vibration (2010) 329:5209–5221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yeh RH. Optimal inspection and replacement policies for multi-state deteriorating systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 96:248–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.